Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 13 August 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article finds that epistemology cannot be subsumed under or identified with a science. Epistemology and the sciences should remain distinct yet cooperative. This article presents several examples that illustrate the relevance of science to epistemology. For example, classical epistemology was heavily concerned with the sources of knowledge, where “sources” refers to the kinds of psychological faculties responsible for knowledge. Drawing from work in psychology, this article proposes that science can shed light on epistemic achievements by contributing to the understanding of the nature and extent of human cognitive endowments. It suggests, in addition, that psychology can also contribute to understanding of the sources of knowledge. Finally, it argues that some specific projects in epistemology can receive important contributions from psychology, economics, and sociology.

Keywords: epistemology, knowledge, psychology, economics, sociology

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.