- Copyright Page
- Acknowledgments
- List of Contributors
- Women, Peace, and Security: A Transformative Agenda?
- Peace and Security from a Feminist Perspective
- Adoption of 1325 Resolution
- Civil Society’s Leadership in Adopting 1325 Resolution
- Scholarly Debates and Contested Meanings of WPS
- Advocacy and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda
- WPS as a Political Movement
- Locating Masculinities in WPS
- WPS and Adopted Security Council Resolutions
- WPS and Gender Mainstreaming
- The Production of the 2015 Global Study
- WPS and Conflict Prevention
- What Works in Participation
- What Works (and Fails) in Protection
- What Works in Relief and Recovery
- Where the WPS Pillars Intersect
- WPS and Female Peacekeepers
- WPS and SEA in Peacekeeping Operations
- WPS and Peacekeeping Economies
- WPS in Military Training and Socialization
- WPS and Policing: New Terrain
- WPS, States, and the National Action Plans
- WPS inside the United Nations
- WPS and the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Sexual Violence in Conflict
- WPS and the Human Rights Council
- WPS and International Financial Institutions
- WPS and the International Criminal Court
- WPS and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
- WPS and the African Union
- WPS and the Association of South East Asian Nations
- WPS and the Pacific Islands Forum
- WPS and the Organization of American States
- WPS and Civil Society
- WPS and Transnational Feminist Networks
- Delivering WPS Protection in All Female Peacekeeping Force: The Case of Liberia
- Securing Participation and Protection in Peace Agreements: The Case of Colombia
- WPS and Women’s Roles in Conflict-Prevention: The Case of Bougainville
- Women in Rebellion: The Case of Sierra Leone
- Protecting Displaced Women and Girls: The Case of Syria
- Donor States Delivering on WPS: The Case of Norway
- WPS as Diplomatic Vocation: The Case of China
- Women Controlling Arms, Building Peace: The Case of the Philippines
- Testing the WPS Agenda: The Case of Afghanistan
- Mainstreaming WPS in the Armed Forces: The Case of Australia
- WPS and Responsibility to Protect
- WPS and Protection of Civilians
- WPS, Children, and Armed Conflict
- WPS, Gender, and Disabilities
- WPS and Humanitarian Action
- WPS, Migration, and Displacement
- WPS and LGBTI Rights
- WPS and CEDAW, Optional Protocol, and General Recommendations
- Women’s Roles in CVE
- WPS and Arms Trade Treaty
- WPS and Sustainable Development Goals
- WPS and the Convention against Torture
- WPS and Climate Change
- Global Study: Looking Forward
- Measuring WPS: A New Global Index
- Pursuing Gender Security
- The Challenge of Foreign Policy in the WPS Agenda
- Networked Advocacy
- Women’s Peacemaking in South Asia
- WPS, Peace Negotiations, and Peace Agreements
- The WPS Agenda: A Postcolonial Critique
- The WPS Agenda and Strategy for the Twenty-First Century
- The Challenges of Monitoring and Analyzing WPS for Scholars
- Index
Abstract and Keywords
Women’s networked advocacy is a vital strategy for overcoming the exclusion of local civil society from the policymaking process. Networked advocacy provides activists at the global and local level with an opportunity to share knowledge. In doing so, it allows activists to maximize expertise, and it creates space for local civil society to participate in the development of policies and programs. Using the examples of national reconciliation processes in the Middle East and Latin America this chapter explores the strategies employed by activists to advocate for grass-roots participation and leadership. This chapter argues that networked advocacy facilitates a more inclusive reconciliation process, as it recognizes the positive contributions of local peace-builders and enables the participation of grass-roots women’s civil society. Given this, the chapter suggests that influential stakeholders who act as gatekeepers to formal reconciliation processes must recognize the power of these networks and mobilize resources and support to sustain them.
Keywords: networked advocacy, reconciliation processes, Middle East, grass-roots participation, Latin America, local leadership
Yifat Susskind is Executive Director of MADRE, New York, USA.
Diana Duarte is Communications Director, MADRE, New York, USA.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
Please subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.
For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.
- Copyright Page
- Acknowledgments
- List of Contributors
- Women, Peace, and Security: A Transformative Agenda?
- Peace and Security from a Feminist Perspective
- Adoption of 1325 Resolution
- Civil Society’s Leadership in Adopting 1325 Resolution
- Scholarly Debates and Contested Meanings of WPS
- Advocacy and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda
- WPS as a Political Movement
- Locating Masculinities in WPS
- WPS and Adopted Security Council Resolutions
- WPS and Gender Mainstreaming
- The Production of the 2015 Global Study
- WPS and Conflict Prevention
- What Works in Participation
- What Works (and Fails) in Protection
- What Works in Relief and Recovery
- Where the WPS Pillars Intersect
- WPS and Female Peacekeepers
- WPS and SEA in Peacekeeping Operations
- WPS and Peacekeeping Economies
- WPS in Military Training and Socialization
- WPS and Policing: New Terrain
- WPS, States, and the National Action Plans
- WPS inside the United Nations
- WPS and the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Sexual Violence in Conflict
- WPS and the Human Rights Council
- WPS and International Financial Institutions
- WPS and the International Criminal Court
- WPS and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
- WPS and the African Union
- WPS and the Association of South East Asian Nations
- WPS and the Pacific Islands Forum
- WPS and the Organization of American States
- WPS and Civil Society
- WPS and Transnational Feminist Networks
- Delivering WPS Protection in All Female Peacekeeping Force: The Case of Liberia
- Securing Participation and Protection in Peace Agreements: The Case of Colombia
- WPS and Women’s Roles in Conflict-Prevention: The Case of Bougainville
- Women in Rebellion: The Case of Sierra Leone
- Protecting Displaced Women and Girls: The Case of Syria
- Donor States Delivering on WPS: The Case of Norway
- WPS as Diplomatic Vocation: The Case of China
- Women Controlling Arms, Building Peace: The Case of the Philippines
- Testing the WPS Agenda: The Case of Afghanistan
- Mainstreaming WPS in the Armed Forces: The Case of Australia
- WPS and Responsibility to Protect
- WPS and Protection of Civilians
- WPS, Children, and Armed Conflict
- WPS, Gender, and Disabilities
- WPS and Humanitarian Action
- WPS, Migration, and Displacement
- WPS and LGBTI Rights
- WPS and CEDAW, Optional Protocol, and General Recommendations
- Women’s Roles in CVE
- WPS and Arms Trade Treaty
- WPS and Sustainable Development Goals
- WPS and the Convention against Torture
- WPS and Climate Change
- Global Study: Looking Forward
- Measuring WPS: A New Global Index
- Pursuing Gender Security
- The Challenge of Foreign Policy in the WPS Agenda
- Networked Advocacy
- Women’s Peacemaking in South Asia
- WPS, Peace Negotiations, and Peace Agreements
- The WPS Agenda: A Postcolonial Critique
- The WPS Agenda and Strategy for the Twenty-First Century
- The Challenges of Monitoring and Analyzing WPS for Scholars
- Index