Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 15 December 2019

Abstract and Keywords

The retraction of articles from the scientific literature is a growing phenomenon in scholarly publishing. Retractions, considered the “nuclear option” in scientific self-correction, are becoming more frequent. The number of retractions per year grew by a factor of 10 during the first decade of this century. These events have substantial consequences for scientists, journals, the taxpaying public, and even, in some instances, patients. This chapter provides an overview of the rise in retractions, as well as the reasons for these events and how journals and publishers handle them. Retractions also are placed in the context of a distorted system of merit and productivity in science and academia based on the published paper. Although some observers believe that retractions threaten the integrity of science, the pressure to publish has driven the growth in publications is more corrosive to it as an institution.

Keywords: retractions, integrity, scholarly publishing, scientific literature, self-correction

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.