Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 August 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Two claims are made by Veit Erlmann in his chapter on sound and violence in the legal imagination. The first claim is that, certainly as regards sound, the concept of the object is ill-defined. Instead, Kristeva’s notion of the abject should be used to describe the place of sound, as there is a repression of the initially ambiguous nature of the subject-object relation. The sonic abject is to be found within the unstable boundary between subject and object. The second claim is that, in law, sound can be seen as an abject. Discussing the prominent role of sound in two cases from international criminal law and US constitutional law, Erlmann demonstrates that sound sits uneasily amid legal discourse about agency and intention.

Keywords: sound object, abjection, legal imagination, speech, abject

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.