Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 26 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

Arguments from reference are widely used by people who otherwise disagree about race. They are used by people who think that race is an illusion (antirealists). They are used by people who think that race is socially real (constructivists). Theories of race across the disciplines normally define “race” descriptively to defend their views on what race is. This normal approach has come under attack, from two angles: that descriptive definitions are flawed, and that using any semantic arguments is fruitless. However, normal race theory can be defended against these objections, because the mode of reference relevant to race is descriptive and there is no privileged nondescriptive mode of reference that is (can be) relevant to the race debates.

Keywords: race, meaning, description, Sally Haslanger, theories of race

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.