Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 26 February 2020

(p. xi) Table of Cases

(p. xi) Table of Cases

International Cases

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)

  • Cambodia Power Company v Kingdom of Cambodia and Electricité du Cambodge ICSID ARBITRATION ARB/09/18 520

  • Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Ltd v Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration and Production Company Limited (Bapex) and Bangladesh Oil Gas and Mineral Corporation (Petrobangla) ICSID-ARB/10/11 (27 May 2010) 623, 626

  • Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Ltd v Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration and Production Company Limited (Bapex) and Bangladesh Oil Gas and Mineral Corporation (Petrobangla) ICSID-ARB/10/18 (28 July 2010) 623, 627

  • SAIPEM SpA v People’s Republic of Bangladesh ICSID-ARB/05/7 (25 April 2005) 623–4, 628

  • Scimitar Exploration Limited v Republic of Bangladesh and Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation ICSID-ARB/92/3 (3 November 1992); 5 ICSID Reports 3 623–4, 628

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

  • Application for Revision and Interpretation of the Judgment of 24 February 1982 in the Case concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) (Tunisia v Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) [1985] ICJ Rep 192 517

  • Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1966 in the Case Concerning Application of the Genocide Convention (Bosnia v Yugoslavia) [2003] ICJ Rep 77 465

  • Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) (Preliminary Objections) [1992] ICJ Rep 240 770

  • Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) [1997] ICJ Rep 7 85

  • Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v Thailand) (Merits) [1962] ICJ Rep 6 30, 87, 370, 514, 515, 523

  • Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) (Judgment, Preliminary Objections) [1992] ICJ Rep 240 735, 786

  • Conditions of Admission of a State to Membership in the United Nations (Article 4 of the Charter), Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1948 [1948] ICJ Rep 57 573

  • Constitution of the Maritime Safety Committee of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, Advisory Opinion of 8 June 1960 [1960] ICJ Rep 150 573

  • Corfu Channel [1949] ICJ Rep 1 471, 473

  • Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights [1999] ICJ Rep 62 464

  • East Timor (Portugal v Australia) (Judgment) [1995] ICJ Rep 90 596, 786

  • Factory at Chorzow (Merits) (1928) PCIJ Series A No 17 473

  • Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso v Republic of Mali) [1986] ICJ Rep 554 595

  • Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) [1997] ICJ Rep 7 473

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) [2012] ICJ Rep 99 819 (p. xii)

  • La Grand Case (Germany v United States of America) [2001] ICJ Rep 466 465

  • Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion of 21 June 1971 [1971] ICJ Rep 16 573

  • Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion) [1996] ICJ Rep 226 85, 153, 335, 573

  • North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v Netherlands) [1969] ICJ Rep 3 619

  • North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v Denmark) (Order) [1968] ICJ Rep 9 412

  • Nuclear Test (New Zealand v France) [1995] ICJ Rep 288 188, 807

  • Nuclear Tests (Australia v France) (Provisional Measures) [1973] ICJ Rep 99 786

  • Nuclear Tests (Australia v France) (Judgment) [1974] ICJ Rep 457 154, 188, 786, 806, 807

  • Provisional Measures: Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v Thailand) (Order) [2011] ICJ Rep 537 370

  • Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay) (Judgment) [2010] ICJ Rep 14 184

  • Questions Relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v Australia) (Provisional Orders) [2014] ICJ Rep 147 786

  • Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949 [1949] ICJ Rep 174 573

  • Request for an Examination of the Situation in accordance with Paragraph 60 of the Court’s Judgement 807

  • Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v Thailand) (Judgment) [2013] ICJ Rep 281 370, 515–17

  • Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore) (Judgment) [2008] ICJ Rep 12 30, 226, 465, 797

  • Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia) (Judgment) [2002] ICJ Rep 625 30, 226

  • United Nations Administrative Tribunal [1954] ICJ Rep 47 803

  • Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan; New Zealand intervening) (Judgment) [2014] ICJ Rep 226 199, 229, 786, 807

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)

  • Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v Singapore), ITLOS Case No 12, Provisional Measures Order of 8 October 2003 224, 284–5

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar) ITLOS Case No 16, Judgment of 14 March 2012 30, 223, 225, 284, 619, 620

  • Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v Japan; Australia v Japan), ITLOS Case Nos 3 and 4, Provisional Measures Order of 27 August 1999 224, 284–5, 782, 805, 807

  • The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v India), ITLOS Case No 24, Provisional Measures Order of 24 August 2015 225, 284

  • The ‘Hoshinmaru’ (Japan v Russian Federation), ITLOS Case No 14, Prompt Release Judgment of 6 August 2007 225, 284

  • The ‘Tomimaru’ (Japan v Russian Federation), ITLOS Case No 15, Prompt Release Judgment of 6 August 2007 225, 284

  • The ‘Volga’ (Russian Federation v Australia), ITLOS Case No 11, Prompt Release Judgment of 23 December 2002 224, 284, 782

(p. xiii) Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

  • Arbitration Between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China, In re, PCA Case No 2013–19, (Award) 12 July 2016 408

  • Arbitration Between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China, In re, PCA Case No 2013–19 (Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility) 29 October 2015 408

  • Conciliation between the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste and The Commonwealth of Australia, PCA Case No 201-10 (Award) 9 May 2018 226

  • Island of Palmas [or Miangas] (United States v Netherlands), PCA Case No 1925-01 (Award) 4 April 1928 407

  • Phillip Morris Asia Ltd v Australia, PCA Case No 2012/12 (Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility) 17 December 2015 786

  • Railway Land Arbitration (Malaysia v Singapore), PCA Case No 2012-01 (Award) 30 October 2014 30

  • Republic of the Philippines v People’s Republic of China (The South China Sea Arbitration) PCA Case No 2013-19 (Award) 12 July 2016 35, 199, 218, 220, 225, 285

  • Republic of the Philippines v People’s Republic of China (The South China Sea Arbitration), PCA Case No 2013-19 (Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility) 29 October 2015 220, 225

  • The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v India), PCA Case No 2015-28 (Provisional Measures Order) 29 April 2016 225, 285

  • The Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration (Bangladesh v India), PCA Case No 2010-16 (Award) 7 July 2014 223, 225, 285, 619, 621, 622

  • The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v United Kingdom), PCA Case No 2011-03 (Award) 18 March 2015 225

  • The Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Pakistan v India) (2013) PCA Case No 2011-01 (Award) 20 December 2013 594

United Nations – Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Committee Against Torture (CAT)

  • Bairamov v Kazakhstan, Committee against Torture Communication No 497/2012, Decision adopted 14 May 2014, UN Doc CAT/C/52/D/497/2012 728

  • Gerasimov v Kazakhstan, Committee against Torture Communication No 433/2010, Decision of 24 May 2012, UN Doc CAT/C/48/D/433/2010 728

Human Rights Committee

  • Akmatov v Kyrgyzstan, HRC Communication No 2052/2011, Views of 29 October 2015, UN Doc CCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011 728

  • Zhumbaeva v Kyrgyzstan, HRC Communication No 1756/2008, Views of 19 July 2011, UN Doc CCPR/C/102/D/1756/2008 728

World Trade Organization (WTO)

  • China—Measures Affecting Imports of Automobile Parts (15 December 2008) WT/DS339/AB/R 249

  • China—Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products (21 December 2009) WT/DS363/AB/R 249

  • China—Publications and Audiovisual Products (11 May 2012) WT/DS363/19 249 (p. xiv)

  • European Communities—Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries (7 April 2004) WT/DS246/AB/R 244–5

  • European Union—Measures Related to Price Comparison Methodologies (December 2016) WT/DS516/11 249

  • Poland—Import Regime for Automobiles—Notification of Mutually Agreed Solution (11 September 1996) WT/DS19/2 244

  • Thailand—Customs and Fiscal Measures on Cigarettes from the Philippines (17 June 2011) WT/DS371/AB/R 382

  • United States—Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China (11 March 2011) WT/DS379/AB/R 249

  • United States—Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (12 October 1998) WT/DS58/AB/R 245

  • United States—Imposition of Import Duties on Automobiles from Japan under Section 301 and 304 of the Trade Act of 1974—Request for Consultations by Japan (22 May 1995), WT/DS6/1 242

  • United States—Measures Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India (25 April 1997) WT/DS33/AB/R 244, 245

  • United States—Measures Related to Price Comparison Methodologies (December 2016) WT/DS515/15 249

Jurisdiction

Australia

  • Airlines of NSW Pty Ltd v NSW [No 2] (1965) 113 CLR 54 789

  • Al Kateb v Godwin [2004] HC 37 792–3

  • AMS v AIF (1999) CLR 160 792

  • Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 791

  • Bradley v Commonwealth (1973) 128 CLR 557 788

  • Chin Yin Ten v Little (1976) 69 ILR 76 472

  • Chu Kheng Lim v The Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 792

  • Chung Chi Cheung v The King [1938] UKPC 75 794

  • Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1 788–90

  • Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 791

  • DJL v The Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 789

  • Horta v Commonwealth (1994) 181 CLR 183 789

  • Jumbunna Coal Mine NL v Victorian Coal Miners’ Association (1908) 6 CLR 309 792

  • Kartinyeri v Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337 792

  • Koowarta v Bjelke Petersen (1982) 153 CLR 168 788–9

  • Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 475, 793

  • Maloney v The Queen (2013) 252 CLR 168 791

  • Minister for Home Affairs of the Commonwealth v Zentai (2012) 246 CLR 238 791

  • Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 474, 751, 788, 792–3

  • Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v QAAH of 2004 (2006) 231 CLR 1 791

  • Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 751, 794

  • Minogue v Williams (2000) 60 ALD 366 788, 791

  • New South Wales v The Commonwealth (1975) 135 CLR 337 789–90 (p. xv)

  • Newcrest Mining (WA) Ltd v Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 513 792

  • Nulyarimma v Thompson [1999] 96 FCR 153 794

  • Polites v Commonwealth (1945) 70 CLR 60 787, 792

  • Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501 789

  • Potter v Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 479 794

  • R v Burgess; Ex parte Henry (1936) 55 CLR 608 788

  • R v Sharkey (194) 79 CLR 121 789

  • Richardson v Forestry Commission (Tasmania) (1988) 164 CLR 261 789

  • Royal Women’s Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [2006] VSCA 85 793

  • Simsek v McPhee (1982) CLR 636 793

  • Victoria v Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 416 788–9

  • Zhang v Zemin [2010] NSWCA 255 792

Bangladesh

  • Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust v Bangladesh 63 DLR (2011) 1 609–10, 615

  • Bangladesh v Sheikh Hasina 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 90 609–10

  • Bangladesh v Somboon Asavaham 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 194 609

  • BNWLA v Government of Bangladesh 14 BLC (2011) 694 610

  • BNWLA v Government of Bangladesh 31 BLD (HCD) (2011) 324 610

  • Chevron Bangladesh Block Twelve, Ltd and Chevron Bangladesh Blocks Thirteen and Fourteen, Ltd v People’s Republic of Bangladesh ICSID-ARB/06/10 (30 June 2006) 623, 625, 628

  • Chief Prosecutor v Abdul Quader Molla 22 BLT (AD) (2014) 8 614–16

  • Dr Mohiuddin Farooque v Bangladesh 49 DLR (AD) (1997) 1 609

  • Dr Shipra Chaudhury v Government of Bangladesh 29 BLD (HCD) (2009) 183 609–10

  • Hussain Mohammad Ershad v Bangladesh 21 BLD (2001) 69 609

  • Kazi Mukhlesur Rahman v Bangladesh 26 DLR (SC) (1974) 44 608–9

  • M Saleem Ullah v Bangladesh 47 DLR (1995) 218 605, 618

  • Major (Retd) Akhtaruzzaman v Bangladesh, Writ Petition No 3774 of 1999 (unreported) 609

  • Md. Asaduzzaman v Bangladesh 42 DLR (1990) 144 609

  • Mohammad Emrul Kayes v Government Bangladesh 35 BLD (2015) 94 609

  • Professor Nurul Islam v Government of Bangladesh 52 DLR (2000) 413 609, 614

  • Saiful Islam Dilder v Bangladesh 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 318 605

  • State v Md. Roushan Mondal 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 549 609

  • State v Metropolitan Police Commissioner 60 DLR (2008) 660 609

  • State v Secretary, Ministry of Law, Suo Motu Rule No 5621 of 2009 (unreported) 609, 614

  • Tayeeb v Government Bangladesh 67 DLR (AD) (2015) 57 609

Cambodia

Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia

  • Decision on IENG Sary’s Appeal against the Closing Order, D427/1/30, 11 April 2011 509–10

  • Kaing Guek Eav (Duch) (001/18-07-2007/ECCC-E188), Trial Chamber Judgment, 26 July 2010 510

  • Kaing Guek Eav alias ‘Duch’, Case No 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/SC, Appeal Judgment, Doc No F28 (3 February 2012) 512

  • NUON Chea et al, 002/19-09-2007/ECCC-E270/1, Trial Chamber Decision, 14 March 2013 511 (p. xvi)

  • NUON Chea et al, 002/19-09-2007-ECCC-OCIJ (PTC 35, 37, 38 and 39), Decision on Appeals against the Co-Investigative Judges’ Order on Joint Criminal Enterprise, 20 May 2010 503

  • NUON Chea et al, 002/19-09-2007-ECCC-OCIJ (PTC 145 and 146), Decision on Appeal by Nuon Chea and Ieng Thirith against the Closing Order, 15 February 2011 503

  • Prosecutor v NUON Chea, Public Decision on the Co-Lawyers’ Urgent Application for Disqualification of Judge Ney Thol Pending the Appeal against the Provisional Detention Order in the Case of Nuon Chea, Case No 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/OCIJ, 4 February 2008 510

Canada

  • Reference re Exemption of US Forces from Canadian Criminal Law [1943] 4 DLR 11 472

Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)

Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States

  • Advisory Opinion No 01-1/1-08 of 24 September 2008 716, 717

  • Advisory Opinion No 01-1/3-10 of 20 June 2011 709

  • Judgment No C-1/14-96 of 11 September 1996 709

  • Judgment No 01-1/1-03 of 13 February 2004 708

  • Judgment No 01-1/3-04 of 10 November 2004 709

  • Judgment No 01-1/3-06 of 18 April 2008 708

  • Judgment No 01-1/1-14 of 23 September 2014 709

  • Judgment No 01-1/1-16 of 17 June 2016 710

  • Judgment No 01-1/3-16 of 21 March 2017 710

  • Judgment No 01-1/4-16 of 3 April 2017 710

  • Ruling of the Plenum No 01-1/3-06/1 Pl of 14 April 2010 708

Cook Islands

  • Section 201 of the Income Tax Act 1997, Application by Smith, In Re (Unreported, High Court, 26 April 1999, [1999] CKHC 1 754, 747

European Union

  • Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos [1963] ECR 1 716

Fiji

  • State v Mutch [1999] 45 FLR 253 752

  • State v Kata Unreported, High Court, 10 May 2000 752

Samoa

  • Attorney-General v Saipa’ia Olamalu [1980–93] WSLR 41 760–1

  • Komesina o Sulufaiga (Ombudsman) Act 1988 757

  • Lafaialii v Attorney-General [2003] WSSC 8 760, 761

  • Sefo v A-G [2000] WSSC 18 761

  • Ta’amale v Attorney-General [1980–93] WSLR 41 761

  • Tuivaita v Faamala [1980–93] WSLR 17 761 (p. xvii)

  • Ututa’alega v Luafatasaga Iulio Unreported, Land and Titles Court (Appellate Division), 19 March 1987 761

  • Wagner v Radke (Unreported, Supreme Court, Samoa, Sapolu CJ, 19 February 1997; [1997] WSSC 6 747

India

  • Apparel Export Promotion Council v A K Chopra (1999) 1 SCC 759; 1999 SCC (L&S) 405 566

  • Jeeja Ghosh v Union of India (1993) SCC Online SC 510 570

  • Jeeja Ghosh v Union of India (2016) 7 SCC 761 569

  • Justice KS Puttaswamy and Anor v Union of India and Ors (Writ Petition (Civil) No 494 of 2012 566, 570

  • Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 235 565

  • Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel v Union of India AIR (1969) SC 783 567

  • MV Elizabeth v Harwan Investment & Trading Pvt Ltd, Goa AIR (1993) SC 1014 571

  • National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (2014) 5 SCC 438 565, 569

  • Nilabati Behera v Union of India (1993) SCR (2) 581 569

  • People’s Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India AIR (1997) SC 568 570

  • Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v Union of India and Others AIR (1996) SC 2715; (1996) 5 SCC 647 203, 571

  • Vishaka and Others v State of Rajasthan and Others (1997) 6 SCC 241 568

Indonesia

  • Case No 13/PUU-XVI/2018 399

  • Ruling of the District Court of Samarinda City No 55/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Smda, 2014 401

Kiribati

  • R v Timiti Unreported, High Court, 17 August 1998, [1998] KIHC 35 753

Malaysia

  • Abd Malek bin Hussin v Borhan bin Hj Daud [2008] 1 MLJ 368 (High Court Kuala Lumpur) 475

  • Borhan bin Hj Daud & Ors v Abd Malek bin Hussin [2010] 6 MLJ 329 (Court of Appeal) 476

  • Commonwealth of Australia v Midford (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd [1990] 1 CLJ 878; [1990] 1 MLJ 475 (Supreme Court of Malaysia) 470

  • Dato’ Param Cumaraswamy v MBF Capital Bhd [1997] 3 MLJ 824 (Court of Appeal) 464

  • Government of the State of Kelantan v the Government of the Federation of Malaya and Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj [1963] MLJ 355 (Federation of Malaya High Court) 461, 468

  • Insas Bhd v Dato’ Param Cumaraswamy [2000] 4 MLJ 727 465

  • Kerajaan Negeri Selangor v Sagong Bin Tasi [2005] 6 MLJ 289 (Court of Appeal) 475

  • MBF Capital Bhd v Dato’ Param Cumaraswamy [1997] 3 MLJ 300 463

  • Merdeka University Bhd v Government of Malaysia [1981] 2 MLJ 356 473–4

  • Mersing Omnibus Co Sdn Bhd v Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Pengangkutan Semenanjung Malaysia [1999] 1 MLJ 44 474

  • Mohamad Ezam bin Mohd Noor v Ketua Polis Negara [2002] 4 MLJ 449 474

  • Olofsen v Government of Malaysia [1966] 2 MLJ 300 (OCJ Singapore) 469

  • Public Prosecutor v Narogne Sookpavit [1987] 2 MLJ 100 (High Court Johore Bahru) 471

  • Public Prosecutor v Oie Hee Koi [1968] 1 MLJ 148 (Privy Council Appeal from Malaysian Federal Court) 469 (p. xviii)

  • Public Prosecutor v Rajappan [1986] 1 MLJ 152 (Supreme Court Kuala Lumpur) 471, 472

  • Public Prosecutor v Wah Ah Jee (1919) 2 FMSLR 193 (Supreme Court) 468, 472, 473

  • Sagong Bin Tasi v Kerajaan Negeri Selangor [2002] 2 MLJ 591 (High Court) 475

  • SIS Forum (Malaysia) v Dato’ Seri Syed Hamid Albar (Menteri Dalam Negeri) [2010] 2 MLJ 377 (Application for Judicial Review, High Court Kuala Lumpur) 474

  • Sockalingam Chettiar v Chan Moi [1947] MLJ 154 (Malayan Union Court of Appeal) 469

  • Sultan of Johore v Tungku Abubakar [1952] MLJ 115 459

  • Village Holdings Sdn, Bhd v Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada [1988] 2 MLJ 656 (High Court Kuala Lumpur) 470

Myanmar

  • Emperor v Maung Tha Din (1920) Criminal Revn No 424-B of 1935 533

  • Emperor v Nga Po Sin (1920) Criminal Revn No 383 of 1920 533

Nepal

  • Balkrishna Neupane v Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala Decision No 6312 NKP (2054) 77 635

  • Chandra Kant Gyawali v HMG Cabinet Secretariat and Others Decision No 7044 NKP (2058) 84 636

  • Dinesh Kumar Sharma v Office of the Council of Ministers Decision No 7757 NKP (2063) 1136 636

  • FWLD v Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers Decision No 7635 NKP (2063) 49 636

  • Gyanraj Rai v Cabinet Secretariat and Others Decision 2058/12/8 Writ No 2651 (2056) 635

  • Jagriti Bal Club v HMG, Ministry of Home Decision No 7020 NKP (2058) 44 636

  • Janhit Sanrakshan Manch v Office of the Council of Ministers Decision No 7951 NKP (2065) 398 636

  • Lawyer’s Association for Human Rights of Nepalese Indigenous Peoples v Prime Minister and Council of Ministers Decision No 8990 NKP (2070) 61 636

  • Madhav Kumar Basnet and Others v Government of Nepal Writ No 069-WS-0057 (2 January 2014) 640

  • Mira Kumari Dhungana and Others v Ministry of Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and Others NKP (2052) 468 637

  • Narayan Bahadur Khadka v Ministry of Home Decision No 7316 NKP (2061) 748 636

  • Rajendra Prasad Dhakal & Others v Nepal Government Writ No 3575 (registered 21 January 1999), Decision on Petition for Habeas Corpus and Mandamus, 49(2) NLR, Decision No 7817 P, 169 (1 June 2007) 638

  • Raju Prasad Chapagain v Government of Nepal NKP (2063) 203 640

  • Rama Panta Kharel v Government of Nepal NKP (2065) 398 636

  • Sapna Malla Pradhan and Others v Office of the Prime Minister and Others NKP (2065) 917 637

  • Suman Adhikari & Others v Office of Prime Minister and Council of Ministers NKP (2074) 6, Decision No 962 (26 February 2015) 640

  • Sunil Babu Pant & others v Nepal Government, Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers & Others (Writ No 917) (2008) Nepal Judicial Academy Law Journal 261 637

New Zealand

  • Ashman, Re [1985] NZLR 224 815

  • Berry, Re [1955] NZLR 1003 815 (p. xix)

  • Chief Executive of the New Zealand Customs Services v Rakaia Engineering and Contracting Ltd [2002] 3 NZLR 24 (CA) 819

  • Department of Labour v Latailakepa [1982] 1 NZLR 632 (CA) 816

  • Fairfax v Ireton [2009] 3 NZLR 289 (CA) 819

  • Governor of Pitcairn v Sutton [1995] 1 NZLR 426 818

  • Hosking v Runting [2005] 1 NZLR 1 819

  • Hourigan, Re [1946] NZLR 1 815

  • Huakina Development Trust v Waikato Valley Authority [1987] 2 NZLR 188 817

  • Hunt v Gordon (1883–4) NZLR 2 CA 160 809

  • Inspector of Fisheries v Ihaia Weepu [1956] NZLR 920 815

  • King-Ansell v Police [1979] 2 NZLR 531 (CA) 816, 819

  • Lawson v Customs Department, Auckland M1015/75, 1 October 1975 815

  • R v Dodd (1874) 2 CA (NZ) 598; 2 NZ Jur 52 809

  • R v Fineberg (No 2) [1968] NZLR 443 (CA) 815

  • R v Pora [2001] 2 NZLR 37 816

  • Tasman Orient Line CV v NZ China Clays Ltd [2010] 3 NZLR 1 (SC) 819

  • The Award of the Wellington Cooks and Stewards’ Union, Re (1906) 26 NZLR 394 811

  • The Bed of the Wanganui River, Re [1963] NZLR 461 815

  • Van Gorkom v Attorney-General [1977] 1 NZLR 535, affirmed [1978] 2 NZLR 387 816

  • Wharton v Registrar of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [1921] NZLR 817 812

  • Worth v Worth [1931] NZLR 1109 812

  • X v Attorney-General [2017] 3 NZLR 115 819

  • Young v Attorney-General [2018] NZCA 307 819

  • Zaoui v Attorney-General (No 2) [2006] 1 NZLR 289 (SC) 819

Pakistan

  • District Bar Association, Rawalpindi v Federation of Pakistan PLD 2015 SC 401 582

  • Federation of Pakistan v Shaukat Ali Mian PLD 1999 SC 1026 600

  • Foundation for Fundamental Rights v Federation of Pakistan PLD 2013 Pesh 94 583, 584

  • Haji Lal Muhammad v Federation of Pakistan PLD 2014 Peshawar 199 600

  • Imran Ahmad Khan Niazi v Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and 9 Ors PLD 2017 SC 265 599

  • M/S Najib Zarab Limited v Government of Pakistan PLD 1993 Karachi 93 600

  • Maple Leaf Cement Factory Ltd v Environmental Protection Agency [Lahore High Court] Case No 115949/2017 203

  • Province of Sindh v Lal Khan Chandio 2007 SCMR 403 601

  • Shehla Zia v WAPDA PLD 1994 SC 6 203

  • Suo Motu, In re, Case No 1/K of 2006 PLD 2008 FSC 1 601

  • Supreme Court of Pakistan, Civil Appeals No 1583-1598 of 2014 603

  • Syed Imran Ali Shah v Government of Pakistan 2013 PLC 143 600

  • Syed Mansoor Ali Shah v Government of Punjab PLD 2007 Lahore 40 601

  • The Superintendent, Land Customs Torkham (Khyber Agency) v Zewar Khan and Others PLD 1969 SC 485 595

Papua New Guinea

  • Application by Ireeuw, Wawar, Ap, and Wakum, Re [1985] PNGLR 430 754

  • Fa v Naniura [1990] PNGLR 506 754

  • Premdas v Independent State of Papua New Guinea [1979] PNGLR 329 755

(p. xx) Philippines

  • Abaya v Ebdane [2007] GR No 167919 (First Division) 14 February 2007; 515 SCRA 720 [2007] 418

  • Agustin v Edu [1979] GR No L-49112 [En Banc] 2 February 1979; 88 SCRA 195 [1979] 413

  • Arigo v Swift [2014] GR No 206510 16 September 2014; 735 SCRA 102 [2014] 424

  • Bayan Muna v Romulo [2011] GR No 159618 [En Banc] 1 February 2011; 641 SCRA 244 [2011] 418

  • Bayan v Zamora [2000] GR No 13857, GR No 138572, GR No 138587, GR No 138698 [En Banc] 10 October 2000; 342 SCRA 449 [2000] 415–16

  • Borovsky v Commissioner [1951] GR No L-4352 [En Banc] 28 September 1951 (Supreme Court) 413

  • Commissioner of Customs v Eastern Trading [1961] GR No L-14279 [En Banc] 31 October 1961; 3 SCRA 351 [1961] 414

  • Compagnie de Commerce v Hamburg Amerika [1917] GR No L-10986 [En Banc] 31 March 1917 406–7

  • Del Socorro v Van Wilsem [2014 GR No 193707 [Third Division] 10 December 2014; 516 SCRA 517 [2014] 427

  • Go Kim Cham v Valdez [1945] GR No L-5 (En Banc) 17 September 1945; 75 Phil Reports 113 [1945] 411–12

  • Gonzales v Hechanova [1961] GR No L-21897 [En Banc] 22 October 1963; 9 SCRA 230 [1963] 418

  • In the Matter of Charges of Plagiarism etc against Associate Justice Mariano C. Del Castillo [2011] AM No 10-7-17-SC [En Banc] 10 October 2010 420

  • Kookoritchkin v Solicitor General [1948] GR No L-1812 27 August 1948; 81 Phil Reports 435 [1948] 424

  • Kuroda v Jalandoni [1946] GRNo L-2662 [En Banc] 26 March 1949; 83 Phil Reports 171 [1946] 412

  • Lagman v Medialdea [2017] GR No 231658, GR No 231771, GR No 231774 [En Banc] 4 July 2017 431

  • Lim v Executive Secretary [2002] GR No 151445, 11 April 2002; 380 SCRA 739 [2002] 416

  • Magallona v Ermita [2011] GR No 187617 [En Banc] 16 August 2011; 665 SCRA 476 [2011] 420–1, 432

  • Manalo v Secretary of National Defense [2008] GR No 180906 [En Banc] 7 October 2008; 568 SCRA 1 [2008] 422

  • Mejoff v Director of Prisons [1949] GR No L-2855 [En Banc] 30 July 1949 413

  • Mejoff v Director of Prisons [1951] GR No L-4254 [En Banc] 26 September 1951 (Supreme Court) 413

  • Mijares v Rañada [2005] GR No 139325 [Second Division] 12 April 2005; 455 SCRA 397 [2005] 413

  • Nicholas v Romulo [2009] GR No 175888 [En Banc] 11 February 2009; 578 SCRA 438 [2009] 416–17

  • Oposa v Factoran [1993] GR No 101083 [En Banc] 30 July 1993; 224 SCRA 792 [1993] 425–6

  • Pharmaceutical and Health Care Association of the Philippines v Duque [2007] GR No 173034 [En Banc] 9 October 2007; 264 SCRA 265 [2007] 429

  • Philippine Coalition for the International Criminal Court v Executive Secretary GR No 239483, filed on 8 June 2018 431–2

  • Pimentel v Executive Secretary [2005] GR No 158088 [En Banc] 6 July 2005; 462 SCRA 622 [2005] 418–19, 432

  • Razon v Tagitis [2009] GR No 182498 3 December 2009; 606 SCRA 598 [2009] 423, 429 (p. xxi)

  • Republic of the Philippines v Sandiganbayan [2003] GR No 104768 [En Banc] 21 July 2003; 497 SCRA 10 [2003] 426–7

  • Republic of the Philippines v Sereno [2018] GR No 237428 [En Banc] 11 May 2018 431

  • Saguisag v Ochoa [2016] GR No 212426, GR No 212444 [En Banc] 12 January 2016; 342 SCRA 241 [2016] 417–18, 432

  • Senators v Cayetano GR No 238875, filed on 16 May 2018 431

  • Shoop, In Re [1920] GRNo L-15895 [En Banc] 29 November 1920; 41 Phil Rep 213, 29 November 1920 407

  • Simon v Commission on Human Rights [2004] GR No 100150 [En Banc] 5 January 1994; 229 SCRA 117 [1994] 425

  • Sr Ma Juanita R Daño v The Philippine National Police, GR No 234484, filed on 18 October 2017 431–2

  • The Rule on the Writ of Amparo, AM No 07-9-12-SC 25 September 2007 422, 423, 431

  • The Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data, AM No 08-1-16-SC 22 January 2008 422

  • Vinuya v Executive Secretary [2010] GR No 162230, 28 April 2010; 619 SCRA 533 [2010] 419, 432

  • Yamashita v Styer [1945] GR No L-129 [En Banc] 19 December 1945; 75 Phil Reports 563 [1945] 412

Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Bairamov v Department of Internal Affairs of Kostanai Region, Kostanai City Court, Judgment No 2-8617/2014 of 12 December 2014 728

  • Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Normative Resolution No 2 of 27 February 2008 725

  • Gerasimov v Department of Internal Affairs of Kostanai Region, Kostanai City Court, Judgment No 2-7843/2013 of 18 November 2013 728

  • Normative Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan No 1 of 10 July 2008 ‘On the Application of Norms of International Treaties of the Republic of Kazakhstan’ 718, 725

  • Resolution of the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan No 2 of 18 May 2006 ‘On the Official Interpretation of Article 54(7) of the Constitution’ 717

Singapore

  • Chan Kin Foo v City Developments Ltd [2013] 2 SLR 895 445

  • Chee Siok Chin v Minister for Home Affairs [2006] 1 SLR(R) 582 447, 453

  • Civil Aeronautics Administration v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2004] 1 SLR 570 448

  • CX v CY (Minor: Custody and Access) [2005] SGCA 37; [2005] 3 SLR 690 447

  • Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGCA 21 455

  • Lee Hsien Loong v Review Publishing Co Ltd [2007] 2 SLR(R) 453 448

  • Ng Kwok Chun v Public Prosecutor [1992] 3 SLR(R) 134 (CA) 447

  • Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor [2005] 1 SLR 103 446

  • Novelty Pte Ltd v Amanresorts Ltd [2009] 3 SLR(R) 216 449

  • Public Prosecutor v Kho Jabing [2015] 2 SLR 112 455

  • Public Prosecutor v Kuah Kok Choon [448] 3 SLR(R) 752 448

  • Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok Hing [2008] 2 SLR(R) 684 453

  • Public Prosecutor v Nguyen Tuong Van [2004] 2 SLR 328 445

  • Public Prosecutor v Tan Cheng Yew [2013] 1 SLR 1095 445

  • Public Prosecutor v Wong Wee Keong [2015] SGDC 300 448

  • Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation [2014] 1 SLR 1389 448 (p. xxii)

  • Sanum Investments Ltd v Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic [2016] 5 SLR 536 445

  • Tan Ah Yeo v Seow Teck Ming [1989] 1 SLR(R) 134 (High Court) 447

  • Tan Chye Hin v Public Prosecutor [2009] 3 SLR 873 451

  • The Sahand [2011] 2 SLR 1093 445, 450

  • The Trade Resolve [1994] 4 SLR 424 445

  • Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor [2010] 3 SLR 489 444–7

  • Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor [2015] 2 SLR 1129 446

Solomon Islands

  • R v Rose [1987] SPLR 305 752

  • Loumia v DPP [1985–6] SILR 158 762

  • Pusi v Leni Unreported, High Court, 14 February 1997, [1997] SBHC 100 762

  • Tanavalu v Tanavalu Unreported, Court of Appeal, 25 November 1998, [1998] SBCA 8 762

  • Seko v Regina Unreported, High Court, 1 September 2005, [2005] SBHC 100 753

  • K v R Unreported, High Court, 16 September 2005, [2005] SBHC 150 753

  • R v Su’u Unreported, High Court, 1 March 2007, [2007] SNHC 78 752

  • Soeasi v R Unreported, High Court, 7 May 2007, [2007] SBHC 159 752–3

Sri Lanka

  • AAPL v Sri Lanka (1990) 4 ICSID Reports 246 665–6

  • Amal Sudath Silva v Kodituwakku [1987] 2 Sri LR 119 667

  • Bulankulama v Secretary, Ministry of Industrial Development [2000] 3 Sri LR 243 667

  • Mihaly Corporation v Government of Sri Lanka (2002) 6 ICSID Reports 308 665

  • Nallaratnam Singarasa v Attorney General and Others (2006) SC SpL (LA) 182/99 670, 671, 674

  • Sepala Ekanayaka v The Attorney-General (7 August 1986) CA 132/84 673

  • Tikiri Banda Bulankulama v The Secretary, Ministry of Industrial Development (Eppawela case) (2 June 2000) Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka 884/99 (FR) 670

  • Victor Ivan v Silva (1998) 1 Sri LR 340 667

  • Weerawansa v The Attorney General and Others (2000) 1 Sri LR 387 670

Thailand

  • Convention on Biological Diversity of 1992, In Re, Constitutional Court, 5 October 2000, Judgement No 33/2543 372

  • Khadi Mai Lek Daeng [Red Number Case] 283/2557, Supreme Administrative Court 376

  • Sirimit Bunmun, Re, Constitutional Court Ruling 15/2555, Royal Gazette, Vol 129 Part 100 Kor (18 October BE 2555) 376

  • Sataporn Kochpan et al v Corrections Department, Khadi Mai Lek Dum [Black Number Case] 862/2552 376

  • Judgment 6–7/2551 (8 July BE 2551), Thai Constitutional Court 374

Tonga

  • Fa’aosa v Paongo [2006] Tonga LR 329 752

  • Taione v Kingdom of Tonga Unreported, Supreme Court of Tonga, 8 October 2004, [2004] TOSC 47 754

  • Tu’itavake v Porter [1989] Tonga LR 14 753

(p. xxiii) Tuvalu

  • Simona v R Unreported, High Court, Tuvalu, 12 August 2002, [2012] TVHC 1 751

  • Tepulolo v Pou Unreported, High Court, 24 January 2005, [2005] TVHC 1 763

  • Teonea v Kaupule Unreported, High Court, 11 October 2005, [2005] TVHC 2 763

United Kingdom

  • Duff Development Co Ltd v Govt of Kelantan [1924] AC 797 459

  • I Congresso del Partido [1981] 3 WLR 328 472

  • Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co [1995] 1 WLR 1147; [1995] 3 All ER 694 449

  • Mighell v Sultan of Johore [1894] 1 QB 149 459–60

  • Mortensen v Peters (1906) 8 F (J) 93 473

  • Nabob of the Carnatic v East India Company (1791) 30 Eng Rep 391 (HL) 555

  • Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249 449

  • R v Jones [2007] 1 AC 136 749

  • R v Secretary of State, ex parte Rees-Mogg [1994] 1 All ER 457 CA 468

  • The Parlement Belge [1894] 1 QB 149 470

  • Trendtex Trading Corporation v Central Bank of Nigeria [1977] QB 529 470, 472, 570, 749

United States of America

  • Doe v Exxon Mobil Corp 393 E Supp 2d 20 (DDC 2005) 543

  • Doe v Unocal Corp 110 FSupp 2d 1294 (C.D.Cal.2000) (Doe I) 542

  • Filartiga v Pena-Irala, 630 F 2d 876 (1980) 473

  • John Doe I et al v UNOCAL Corp et al 395 F3d 932 (9 Cir 2002) (Doe II) 543

  • John Doe I v Unocal, 963 F.Supp.880 (C.D.Cal.1997) 527, 542

  • Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co 133 SCt 1659 (2013) 543

  • Medellin v Texas [2008] 552 US 491 417

  • Sinaltrainal v Coca-Cola Co 256 F Supp 2d 1345 (SD Fla 2003) 543

  • Sosa v Alvarez-Machain 542 US 692 (2004) 542, 543

  • Weinberger v Rossi [1982] 456 US 25 417

Vanuatu

  • Banga v Waiwo Unreported, Supreme Court, 17 June 1996, [1996] VUSC 5 763

  • Joli v Joli Unreported, Court of Appeal, 7 November 2003, [2003] VUCA 27 750

  • Noel v Toto Unreported, Supreme Court, 19 April 1995, [1995] VUSC 3 763, 764

  • Public Prosecutor v Kota [1989–94] 2 Van LR 661 763, 764

(p. xxiv)