Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 16 November 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This chapter identifies and explores the relationship between the common law principle of legality and the Australian Constitution. To this end, the chapter considers in some detail how the courts might use the Constitution to provide a stronger normative justification for the principle, better fix the content of the rights it operates to protect, and inform how it is applied. The analysis undertaken is based on the view that much of the recent (and likely future) development of the principle in Australia—indeed the principles of statutory interpretation more generally—may well be constitutionally driven. To do so, the present status of the principle of legality is outlined in this chapter. Its evolution in Australian law and the key points of doctrinal controversy and methodological disagreement are also traced and identified.

Keywords: legality, common law, Australian Constitution, normative justification, statutory interpretation, principle of legality, doctrinal controversy, methodological disagreement

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.