Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 28 May 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This chapter examines the relation between folk psychology and cognitive biases in film narration, characterization, and spectatorship. More specifically, the chapter explores the “peak-end” rule and duration neglect as aspects of the way viewers encode their experience of films in long-term memory. As the work of psychologist Daniel Kahneman shows, the “peak-end” rule anticipates that a viewer’s memories of hedonic peaks and dramatic climaxes are more salient than parts of a film less emotionally charged, and further suggests that viewers are less sensitive to the duration of long films if enough hedonic peaks are sprinkled throughout its running time. The chapter concludes with an analysis of Krzysztof Kieslowski’s Blind Chance (1981) as an illustration of the “James Dean” effect, which predicts that viewers adjudge a short, happy life as being more desirable than a longer life containing brief bouts of unhappiness

Keywords: folk psychology, cognitive bias, film spectatorship, “peak-end” rule, duration neglect, memory, Daniel Kahneman, hedonic peaks, Blind Chance, “James Dean” effect

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.