Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 22 September 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Since the birth of criminal justice as a field of study in the 1960s, identifying and explaining racial disparities has been a consistent focus of research. While there is agreement that racial and ethnic disparities exist at every stage in the criminal justice system, the reasons or explanations for these disparities remain a subject for debate. This is especially true in the policing literature. Regardless of the discretionary police decision examined, racial and ethnic disparities exist; however, consensus as to why these disparities exist or how they can be reduced is lacking. Regarding citizens’ perceptions, research consistently indicates that black citizens have the most negative perceptions of police. Regardless of the empirical evidence regarding racial and ethnic disparities, if citizens believe police bias exists, police legitimacy is compromised.

Keywords: police, racial disparities, police bias, citizen perceptions, policing

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.