Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 21 October 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This chapter considers the consequences of bilingualism for planning speech in each of the bilingual’s two languages. Two accounts are contrasted of bilingual language production that make different assumptions about why bilinguals are slower to speak the L2 and sometimes also slower to speak the L1 compared with monolingual speakers. The frequency-lag hypothesis assumes that bilinguals have fewer opportunities to speak each of their languages relative to monolinguals. In contrast, the competition for production model assumes that the parallel activation of the bilingual’s two languages creates competition that requires resolution to allow the intended language to be spoken. Evidence for each of these alternatives is reviewed and how the process of language selection in production may relate to the consequences of bilingualism that have been reported for domain-general cognitive processes is considered.

Keywords: bilingualism, lexical production, language selection, inhibitory control

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.