Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 10 August 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article discusses the settings in which beliefs systematically diverge from reality and identify impacts for bargaining behavior. It is organized around two categories of beliefs: those related to the structure of the negotiation and those germane to people in the negotiation. It also looks at two beliefs about the structure of negotiation: outside options and interests. Biases in these beliefs produce two large and systematic errors, the small pie bias and the fixed pie bias. It then describes the systematic biases that arise in the process of anticipating and learning about a negotiation counterpart. Erroneous beliefs about counterparts might be based on stereotypes, reputations, and general beliefs that negotiators hold about human nature. The small pie bias may possibly exist along with the misperception of personality. It finally offers some ideas and suggestions of where negotiation judgments research might be headed.

Keywords: bargaining, beliefs, negotiation, outside options, interests, small pie bias, fixed pie bias, stereotypes, reputations

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.