Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 16 July 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article argues for the need for improved models of cognitive limitations of bargainers in order to explain and predict outcomes. It became clear early that when designing institutions of bargaining and negotiation there will be two directions, namely one based on the assumption of rationality and one based on empirical findings. Teaching and learning bargaining behavior and better negotiation techniques requires a reliance on mental models and such concepts as success aspirations and satisficing in search. Some new and innovative experimental paradigms are suggested, such as employing bribery games when exploring the behavior of public administrators or inspector games when investigating monitoring in firms and other organizations. The present boom of experimental economics might show a bubble that can collapse when overly optimistic expectations concerning how much can be learned within a short time are not fulfilled.

Keywords: bargaining, negotiation, mental models, bribery games, experimental economics, public administrators, inspector games

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.