Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 15 October 2019

Abstract and Keywords

What does realism about an arbitrary subject-matter have to do with truth? Some views say everything, others hardly anything. Both answers are reflected in ongoing debates between self-styled realists and anti-realists in metaphysics, and other areas. Error theory, nonfactualism, fictionalism, and other forms of opposition to realism are normally articulated and differentiated using the notions of truth and falsity. Given its preoccupation with the limits of literal representation, fictionalism can seem especially ensared in semantics and/or the theory of mental content. Be that as it may, the present chapter aims to establish that there remains an important sense in which the fictionalist gambit does not essentially have anything to do with truth or falsity. In particular, many recognizably fictionalist positions are compatible with nominalism about truths: the view that nothing whatsoever is true.

Keywords: truth, realism, anti-realism, fiction, fictionalism, nominalism

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.