Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 24 September 2020

Abstract and Keywords

Models of happiness should be kept as simple as possible—but not simpler. Most scholars agree that good feelings are necessary for well-being, only pure hedonists argue that they are sufficient. The subjective well-being (SWB) approach includes an evaluation component in the analyses, and is open to the idea that positive and negative feelings should be treated separately. SWB researchers and liberal hedonists further differentiate between levels of happiness: momentary as opposed to remembered feelings, and domain as opposed to general evaluations. Dominant eudaimonic approaches agree that feelings and evaluations are necessary for a good life, but insist that the concept of virtues—in some form or another—must be included in a sufficient taxonomy. Disagreements as how to translate the idea of virtues into a psychological terminology exist, and this chapter discusses how the concept of functioning may fit the role of a eudaimonic element of well-being.

Keywords: functional well-being, hedonia, eudaimonia, feelings, emotions, evaluations, good-bad dimension, optimal functioning, meaning, personal growth

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.