Abstract and Keywords
Schopenhauer acknowledges that there is more to erotic desire than egoism, and he is anxious to distinguish it from generalized appetite. Ultimately, however, we find him paying lip service to the beloved’s “irreplaceability” only to put forward views that are ultimately in tension with it. His conception of agape is likewise problematic, and it is here that the question of asceticism comes to the fore. In what sense, if any, does asceticism involve life-denial or self-denial? What is its relation to agape? And are there any reasons why the genuine lover must pursue this path? This chapter concludes that there are such reasons, but that they can be properly articulated only within a framework that takes us beyond Schopenhauer’s official position. Schopenhauer’s relation to theism remains unclear, but the chapter shall have scotched any suggestion of an uncompromising atheism.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.