Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 15 July 2020

Abstract and Keywords

One striking feature of post-Kantian philosophy in Europe has been the emergence of morality critics, philosophers who, contra the popular consensus, dispute the value of morality and the moral life. Their views find a faint echo in the work of some Anglophone moral philosophers (Philippa Foot and Bernard Williams are the main exemplars), but, this article shows, the ‘Continental’ criticisms of morality generally cut far deeper and more radically. This article sketches the broad contours of the two strands of Continental Morality Criticism, turning in the concluding section to a critical consideration of the plausibility and prospects of these lines of critique of morality. Continental Morality Critics (or at least some of them) pose a far more serious and worrisome challenge to morality than their Anglophone counterparts, this article argues, one that demands attention in an era when the boundaries between philosophy and the empirical sciences are, happily, increasingly blurred.

Keywords: post-Kantian philosophy, morality critics, morality, moral life, empirical sciences

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.