Abstract and Keywords
This article begins with a discussion of the emergence of the international political economy (IPE) as a significant field of study in international relations. It then considers the definition of IPE, early work in IPE, and the efforts to draw distinction between how IPE evolved in the United States in contrast to other parts of the world. It is argued that the range of topics covered by the field to date has been excessively narrow. The majority of the research has focused on international trade issues; global finance has been the second-most significant issue area but has received less attention than trade, while issues relating to foreign direct investment and the reorganization of production have been left largely to management studies and to sociologists. The field has seen plenty of excursions into what proved to be theoretical dead ends. But as Cohen himself argues, to judge progress in IPE by whether or not students have produced a general theory is to set the hurdle unrealistically high. Even the excursions into dead ends did generate new understandings.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.