Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 22 October 2019

Abstract and Keywords

The essence of this article is the minor genre of paradox. Though today considered obscure, a minor genre, the paradox has flourished from time to time since the classical period, enjoying significant popularity in England at the turn of the seventeenth century. An important problem for criticism is why the paradox emerged and flourished in England at this particular time. It had developed in two related traditions: the mock encomium and the argument against received opinion. In the former, the paradox was like a ‘roast’ — ironic praise, replete with burlesqued conventions of formal encomium, for someone or something unworthy of praise. In the sixteenth century the outstanding example of the mock encomium was Desiderius Erasmus' famous Moriae Encomium, a declamation in praise of folly that raised this tradition of the genre to unparalleled force and complexity. The paradox as argument against received opinion, however, disputed common sense concerning ethical and other doctrines.

Keywords: genre, paradox, ironic praise, Desiderius Erasmus, Moriae Encomium, classical period

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.