Abstract and Keywords
The core function of the accusative case is to encode the affected participant in a transitive clause. Finnish is representative of a nominative-accusative language because it shows that Patient objects of canonical transitive clauses will be eligible for acc case marking. In many languages, acc marking extends beyond semantically transitive clauses taking Agent and Patient arguments (such as ‘kill’ or ‘break’). Affectedness, a defining property of a patient, is not the only feature that determines (acc) marking of Os. Given that pronominals frequently display idiosyncratic behaviour as compared to nouns, differential marking of pronominal and nominal Os may seem a merely morphological matter. Accusative markers may attach either to a direct object or to other elements of clauses. This article discusses the formal varieties of the accusative case and examines the role of other features such as animacy for object marking. It uses the term acc (case) in a broad sense which will include, apart from case proper, also other forms of ‘dependent-marking’ including clitics, particles, and adpositions. Finally, the article considers functional varieties and polysemy patterns.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.