Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 23 October 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Clinicians have long appreciated that people with aphasia (PWA) who self-monitor their errorful speech have better outcomes. It has been assumed, with empirical justification, that this is because successful monitoring is associated with a stronger language system, and a robust system is more likely to improve (Strength hypothesis). A second possibility, not incompatible with the first, is that monitoring success in some way causes those language systems to undergo adaptive change (Learning hypothesis). This chapter describes recent evidence from PWA’s self-monitoring of naming errors that supports both the strength and learning hypotheses. A follow-up analysis of monitoring latencies speaks to differences in repair processes for semantic and phonological errors. The discussion develops an explanatory framework that integrates aspects of monitoring theory with models of lexical access and incremental learning.

Keywords: aphasia, speech errors, monitoring, learning, lexical access

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.