- The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect
- Dedication
- Preface
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- R2P in Theory and Practice
- Humanitarian Intervention in the Nineteenth Century
- The Genocide Convention and Cold War Humanitarian Intervention
- The Turbulent 1990s: R2P Precedents and Prospects
- Sovereignty as Responsibility: Building Block for R2P
- Rwanda, Kosovo, and the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty
- The Genesis of R2P: Kofi Annan’s Intervention Dilemma
- R2P’s Status as a Norm
- Sovereignty
- Moral Agents of Protection and Supplementary Responsibilities to Protect
- R2P and International Law: A Paradigm Shift?
- How Well Does R2P Travel Beyond the West?
- The Responsibility Not to Veto: A Responsibility Too Far?
- UN Security Council
- UN General Assembly
- Getting There, Being There: The Dual Roles of the Special Adviser
- UN Human Rights Council and High Commissioner for Human Rights
- The Role of Regional Organizations: A Responsibility Gap?
- The African Union
- Asia Pacific and South Asia
- Europe and the European Union
- Russia
- Latin America
- The Arab Region
- United States
- Addressing the Gender Gap in R2P
- The Blurry Boundary between Peacebuilding and R2P
- The R2P, Protection of Civilians, and UN Peacekeeping Operations
- Saving Individuals from the Scourge of War: Complementarity and Tension between R2P and Humanitarian Action
- The Use of Force
- Conflict Prevention and R2P
- Responding to Forced Displacement as a Mass Atrocity Crime
- Responsibility while Protecting
- The International Criminal Court
- The Use of UN Sanctions to Address Mass Atrocities
- The Politics of Global Humanitarianism: R2P before and after Libya
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Darfur
- The Democratic Republic of Congo
- Kenya
- Libya
- Mali
- Myanmar
- North Korea
- Somalia
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
- Syria
- R2P: The Next Ten Years
- The State, Development, and Humanitarianism: China’s Shaping of the Trajectory of R2P
- Embedding R2P in a New Universal Declaration of Human Responsibilities
- Resetting the Narrative on Peace and Security: R2P in the Next Ten Years
- R2P’s Next Ten Years: Deepening and Extending the Consensus
- Bibliography
- Index
Abstract and Keywords
Since its inception, the responsibility to protect (R2P) principle has been progressively narrowed in its scope and application in order to capture widespread support from governments and civil society. However, as this chapter will explore, R2P came perilously close to failing to recognize the gendered dimension of mass atrocity crimes and the prevention of these crimes. The chapter examines how R2P came to be characterized as ‘gender blind’, and details how, since 2006, the principle’s supporters have engaged and responded to this challenge. The author argues that there is a need to continually theorize and engage in areas of common discourse to collectively progress the mutual agenda of gender equitable human protection.
Keywords: gender, responsibility to protect, women, peace and security, advocacy, human security
Sara Davies, Queensland University of Technology
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
Please subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.
For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.
- The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect
- Dedication
- Preface
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- R2P in Theory and Practice
- Humanitarian Intervention in the Nineteenth Century
- The Genocide Convention and Cold War Humanitarian Intervention
- The Turbulent 1990s: R2P Precedents and Prospects
- Sovereignty as Responsibility: Building Block for R2P
- Rwanda, Kosovo, and the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty
- The Genesis of R2P: Kofi Annan’s Intervention Dilemma
- R2P’s Status as a Norm
- Sovereignty
- Moral Agents of Protection and Supplementary Responsibilities to Protect
- R2P and International Law: A Paradigm Shift?
- How Well Does R2P Travel Beyond the West?
- The Responsibility Not to Veto: A Responsibility Too Far?
- UN Security Council
- UN General Assembly
- Getting There, Being There: The Dual Roles of the Special Adviser
- UN Human Rights Council and High Commissioner for Human Rights
- The Role of Regional Organizations: A Responsibility Gap?
- The African Union
- Asia Pacific and South Asia
- Europe and the European Union
- Russia
- Latin America
- The Arab Region
- United States
- Addressing the Gender Gap in R2P
- The Blurry Boundary between Peacebuilding and R2P
- The R2P, Protection of Civilians, and UN Peacekeeping Operations
- Saving Individuals from the Scourge of War: Complementarity and Tension between R2P and Humanitarian Action
- The Use of Force
- Conflict Prevention and R2P
- Responding to Forced Displacement as a Mass Atrocity Crime
- Responsibility while Protecting
- The International Criminal Court
- The Use of UN Sanctions to Address Mass Atrocities
- The Politics of Global Humanitarianism: R2P before and after Libya
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Darfur
- The Democratic Republic of Congo
- Kenya
- Libya
- Mali
- Myanmar
- North Korea
- Somalia
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
- Syria
- R2P: The Next Ten Years
- The State, Development, and Humanitarianism: China’s Shaping of the Trajectory of R2P
- Embedding R2P in a New Universal Declaration of Human Responsibilities
- Resetting the Narrative on Peace and Security: R2P in the Next Ten Years
- R2P’s Next Ten Years: Deepening and Extending the Consensus
- Bibliography
- Index
