Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 06 April 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article explores the evidence of gender discrimination in professional golf. It explains the methodology used to examine the earnings gap. This is followed by explanations of the golf production function. Then, the description of the data is presented, including summary comparisons between men and women for the years 1998 and 2008. A natural outcome of hitting the ball farther is the decrease in driving accuracy noted in the statistics. The 2008 regressions on levels of earnings per tournament are estimated with less precision than those from 1998. Some care should be exercised when interpreting the SANDSAVE portion of the decomposition. Only 9% of the gap between the women's average earnings and the men's average earnings is attributable to discrimination. The PGA Tour, which is the source of the data for the male golfers in the sample, does not discriminate against women.

Keywords: gender discrimination, PGA, earnings gap, male golfers, female golfers, driving accuracy

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.