Abstract and Keywords
This article argues that public policy should focus more sharply on the distributional consequences of sprawl. There are two sides to a sprawl. On one side is the market-oriented position that maintains urban decentralization. On the other side is the market failure position that argues low-density suburbanization has been an inefficient and inequitable outcome. However, the argument states that the benefits and costs of both are large and roughly of the same order of magnitude, making policy choices far more difficult and the debate far more intense. Both sides are tempted to build on the logic of their own position and trivialize the critiques of the other in an effort to deny the underlying complexity of the welfare analysis of metropolitan form. As long as the population keeps growing, metropolitan areas will continue to expand at relatively low densities and the debate about sprawl will continue.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.