Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 11 November 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article argues that one needs to make use of moral principles in order to satisfy a normative requirement on responsible moral inquiry and discourse—the requirement of “consistency,” or systematic coherence. Sometimes thinking about right and wrong in particular cases is called applied ethics. In particular, bioethics, business ethics, environmental ethics, and legal ethics are included as branches of applied ethics. This article includes these under moral practice, but uses the term more broadly so as to include any attempt to determine what is morally permissible, forbidden, or obligatory in particular circumstances. Such contexts are mainly informal and routine matters that do not come under the heading of a particular discipline such as medical ethics. This article therefore argues, by implication, that an adequate moral theory must articulate and defend moral principles. It is concerned primarily with the attempt to justify moral assessments of act tokens.

Keywords: moral principles, moral inquiry, applied ethics, bioethics, business ethics, environmental ethics

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.