Featured Article:


Comparative Law and Legal History 


Legal historians have sometimes studied the law of one place and time while disregarding that of others. Comparative lawyers have sometimes compared the law of different jurisdictions while ignoring the historical reasons they are alike or unlike. The consequences have been unfortunate. Historians have often explained rules which are ubiquitous by the circumstances peculiar to one time and place. Comparative lawyers have often explained the similarities and differences among laws with a blind eye to how they arose. To understand how these problems came about, this article examines the origins of legal history and comparative law. It then describes, more concretely, why these disciplines need each other. Legal rules acquire their structure over time. Thus even if a comparative law scholar were only interested in the structure of modern rules, he would need the help of history.


Read the full article >


This article by James Gordley is a selection from The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2 ed.), edited by Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann.


Featured Image: :Photo by Giammarco Boscaro on Unsplash 


Explore more articles



Learn more: Watch the video

Also available with Chinese subtitles on Youku












Helpful Resources

Connect with Oxford

We want to hear from you! Engage with OUP’s social media or contact the OHO team.


MAY 8, 2019

What's new: May 2019

This month, Oxford Handbooks Online adds 373 individual articles and 10 complete Handbook titles from across 14 subject areas.

APRIL 4, 2019

What's new: April 2019

This month, Oxford Handbooks Online adds 194 individual articles and 5 complete Handbook titles from across 14 subject areas.

MARCH 14, 2019

What's new: March 2019

This month, Oxford Handbooks Online adds 384 individual articles and 11 complete Handbook titles from across 15 subject areas.