Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 21 June 2018

Abstract and Keywords

Two evaluation designs are widely accepted as yielding results that are causally interpretable: the randomized experiment (RE) and the regression-discontinuity design (RDD). This paper explores theoretical and practical similarities between these two designs that have led some researchers to view them as “close cousins.” We also examine important differences between the designs. We conclude that the theoretical strength and possibility for unbiased implementation in practice warrant the privileged position these two designs hold among researchers concerned with the causal effects of interventions. However, the advantage in statistical power, more generally interpretable effect estimates, and straightforward approach to statistical modeling lead us to advise researchers to choose REs over RDDs when all else is equal.

Keywords: Causal inference, regression discontinuity designs, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experiments

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.