Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).

date: 26 May 2017

Abstract and Keywords

People in the United States, regardless of their own weight, have strong negative attitudes about fat people, and the stigma of weight is particularly apparent for women. There is a huge economic market that depends on people wanting to lose weight, feeling dissatisfied with their bodies, and buying diet products. It is important to emphasize that weight and income are negatively associated in the United States, and that this correlation is especially pronounced for women. Media preoccupation with the health risks of fatness ignores that life expectancy has been increasing. Body weight, and even women's body weight, cannot be understood without reference to race, ethnicity, social class, and sexual orientation. A major focus on fat studies as social inequality needs to come from the social sciences, such as psychology, sociology, political science, and economics. There has been a surge of fat-positive movement and exercise programs.

Keywords: fat studies, United States, economic market, body weight, social inequality, exercise

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.