Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 21 August 2018



Churchland, P.S. (2008). The impact of neuroscience on philosophy. Neuron, 60, 409–11. Egnor, M. (2008). Materialist neuroscience and the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness. Discovery Institute Evolution News and Views Blog. Available at: Greely, H., Sahakian, B., Harris, J., et al. (2008). Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature, 456, 702–5. Illes, J., Moser, M.A., McCormick, J.B., et al. (2009). Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 61–9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Fourth Assessment Report. IPCC. Leshner, A.I. (1997). Addiction is a brain disease and it matters. Science, 278, 45–7. Leshner, A.I. (2005). It’s time to go public with neuroethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 1–2. Morein-Zamir, S. and Sahakian, B.J. (2010). Neuroethics and public engagement training needed for neuroscientists. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 49–51. Moreno, J. (2007). Mind Wars: Brain Research and National Defense. New York: Dana Press. (p. xii) National Science Board (2008). Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Chapter 7: Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Arlington, VA: National Science Board. Research!America (2009). Your Congress – Your Health Survey [online]. Singh, I. and Rose, N. (2009). Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature, 460, 202–7. Yankelovich, D. (2003). Winning greater influence for science. Issues in Science & Technology, 19 [online]. Wooden, R. (2006). The principles of public engagement: At the nexus of science, public policy influence and citizen education. Social Research, 73, 1057–63.