Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).

date: 23 March 2018

Abstract and Keywords

This article provides a review and a perspective on the interaction between neuroscience and the media. It situates public discourse and the communication of neuroscience in an intricate web of social expectations and ethical responsibilities that converge and diverge between different stakeholders such as academic researchers, public sponsors of research, and the interested public. The article highlights some of the key ethical and social challenges that emerge when neuroscientists interact with the media. This study shows that the media manifests important shortcomings in matters of neuroscience explanations and fosters some unrealistic expectations for the outcomes of neuroscience. It concludes with attention to some of the research and practical questions that need further attention in matters of ethics and communication in neuroscience. This article relies on a number of assumptions that need to be acknowledged from the onset. They explain the view that the communication of neuroscience is of crucial importance for neuroethics.

Keywords: neuroscience, ethical responsibilities, communication, media, neuroethics

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.