Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 21 February 2019

(p. 821) References

(p. 821) References

Abaev, V. I. 1964. A Grammatical Sketch of Ossetic. Bloomington/The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Abbott, B. 2004. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. In R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. 122–49.Find this resource:

Abboud, P. F. and E. N. McCarus (eds.). 1983. Elementary Modern Standard Arabic, Parts 1,2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Abdullaev, S. 1954. Grammatika darginskogo jazyka (fonetika i morfologija). Makhachkala: IIJaL.Find this resource:

Abney, S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Abondolo, D. 1998. Hungarian. In D. Abondolo (ed.). The Uralic Languages. London: Routledge, 428–56.Find this resource:

Abraham, W. 2003. The Myth of Doubly Governing Prepositions in German. In E. Shay and U. Seibert (eds.). Motion, Direction and Location in Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 19–38.Find this resource:

Ackerman, F. 1998. Constructions and Mixed Categories: Determining the Semantic Interpretation of Person/Number Marking. In M. Butt and T. H. King (eds.). Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [[http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/3/lfg98.html]Find this resource:

—and J. Moore 2001. Proto-properties and Grammatical Encoding: A Correspondence Theory of Argument Selection. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Adelaar, W. F. H. and P. C. Muysken 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 1990. On Berber Case in the Light of Afroasiatic Languages. In H. G. Mukarovsky (ed.). Proceedings of the Fifth Hamito-Semitic Congress, 1. Beiträge zur Afrikanistik, 40. Vienna: Institut für Afrikanistik und Ägyptologie der Universität Wien. 113–19.Find this resource:

—2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—2001. Mechanisms of Change in Areal Diffusion: New Morphology and Language Contact. In Journal of Linguistics 39. 1–29.Find this resource:

—2002. Language Contact in Amazonia. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—2003. A Grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

R. M. W. Dixon, and M. Onishi (eds.). 2001. Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Aissen, J. 1999. Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 673–711.Find this resource:

(p. 822) Aissen, J. 2003. Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 435–83.Find this resource:

Akhtar, N., and M. Tomasello. 1997. ‘Young Children's Productivity with Word Order and Verb Morphology’. Developmental Psychology 33: 952–65.Find this resource:

Akhutina, T. V. 1991. Is Agrammatism an Anomaly? In Grazer Linguistische Studie 35. 65–81.Find this resource:

Aksu-KoÇ, A. and N. Ketrez. 2007. Early Nominal Morphology in Turkish: Emergence of Case and Number. In U. Stephany and M. D. Voeikova (eds.). Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 27–52.Find this resource:

Aldridge, E. 2004. Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Find this resource:

Alekseev, M. E. 2003. Sravnitel'no-istoriˇceskaja morfologija naxsko-dagestanskix jazykov. Kategorii imeni. Moscow: Academia.Find this resource:

—and B. M. Ataev 1998. Avarskij jazyk. Moscow: Academia.Find this resource:

Allan, K. 2007. The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics. London: Equinox.Find this resource:

Allen, C. L. 1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Allen, J. 1987. Natural Language Understanding. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Find this resource:

Alsina, A. 1996. The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance. Stanford. CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Amberber, M. 1996. Transitivity Alternations, Event-types and Light Verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.Find this resource:

—2000. Valency-Changing and Valency-Encoding Devices in Amharic. In R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 312–32.Find this resource:

—2001. Testing Emotional Universals in Amharic. In J. Harkins and A. Wierzbicka (eds.). Emotions in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 39–72.Find this resource:

—2002. Verb Classes and Transitivity in Amharic. Lincom Sudies in AfroAsiatic Linguistics, 6. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—2005. Differential Subject Marking in Amharic. In M. Amberber and H. de Hoop (eds.). Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: the Case for Case. Oxford: Elsevier. 295–321.Find this resource:

—2008. The Lexical Exponents of Semantic Primes in Amharic. In C. Goddard (ed.). Cross-linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 83–119.Find this resource:

Ambrazas, V. et al. 1985. Grammatika litovskogo jazyka. Vil'njus: Mokslas. [Engl. transl.: Ambrazas, V. et al. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos, 1997.]Find this resource:

Ameka, F. 1994. Ewe. In: C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka. (eds.). Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins,57–86.Find this resource:

Amha, A. 2001. A Grammar of Maale. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Andersen, T. 1988. Ergativity in Päri, a Nilotic OVS language. In Lingua 75. 289–324.Find this resource:

—2000. Anywa and Päri, II: A Morphosyntactic Comparison. In Afrika und Übersee 83. 65–87.Find this resource:

—2002. Case Inflection and Nominal Head Marking in Dinka. In Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 23. 1–30.Find this resource:

Anderson, J. M. 1971. The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 823) —1977. On Case Grammar: Prolegomena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

—1984. Objecthood. In F. Plank (ed.). Objects: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York & London: Academic Press. 29–54.Find this resource:

—1992. Linguistic Representation: Structural Analogy and Stratification. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—1997. A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—2005. Structuralism and Autonomy: From Saussure to Chomsky. In Historiographia Linguistica 32. 117–48.Find this resource:

—2006. Modern Grammars of Case: A Retrospective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—2007. The Grammar of Names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, L. B. 1982. The ‘perfect’ as a Universal and as a Language-Particular Category. In P. J. Hopper (ed.). Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 227–64.Find this resource:

—1986. Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries. In W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds.). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex. 273–312.Find this resource:

Anderson, N. and M. Wade. 1988. Ergativity and Control in Folopa. In Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 19. 1–16.Find this resource:

Anderson, S. R. 1976. On the Notion of Subject in Ergative Languages. In C. N. Li (ed.). Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 1–23.Find this resource:

—1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Andrews, A. D. 1976. The VP-Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. [Reprinted in J. Maling and A. Zaenen (eds.). 1990. Syntax and Semantics 24: Modern Icelandic Syntax. Academic Press Inc. 165–85]Find this resource:

—1985a. The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase. In T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol1: Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154.Find this resource:

—1985b. Studies in the Syntax of Relative and Comparative Clauses. New York: Garland Press.Find this resource:

—1996. Semantic Case-Stacking and Inside-Out Onification. In Australian Journal of Linguistics 16. 1–54.Find this resource:

—2001. Non-Canonical A/S Marking in Icelandic. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon, and M. Onishi (eds.). Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85–111.Find this resource:

—2007. The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase. In T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol.1(2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 132–223.Find this resource:

Anttila, A. and V. Fong. 2000. The Partitive Constraint in Optimality Theory. In Journal of Semantics 17. 281–314.Find this resource:

Aoun, J. and D. Sportiche. 1983. On the Formal Theory of Government. In The Linguistic Review 2. 211–36.Find this resource:

Apel, J. and A. Melinger. 2005. Structural Persistence in the Absence of Global Structural Parallelism. Poster presented at the11th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Ghent, Belgium.Find this resource:

(p. 824) Apel, J. and A. Melinger. In preparation. Structural Persistence from Syntactically NonIdentical Primes.Find this resource:

Arensen, J. 1982. Murle Grammar. Juba: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Ariel, M. 2000. The Development of Person Agreement Markers: From Pronouns to Higher Accessibility Markers. In M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.). Usage-based Models of Lan-guage. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 197–260.Find this resource:

Aristar, A. R. 1996. The Relationship between Dative and Locative: Kuryłowicz's Argument from a Typological Perspective. In Diachronica 13. 207–324.Find this resource:

—1997. Marking and Hierarchy Types and the Grammaticalization of Case-Markers. In Studies in Language 21. 313–68.Find this resource:

Arka, I. W. 2003. Balinese Morphosyntax: A Lexical-functional Approach. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Asher, R. E. and T. C. Kumari. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Ashton, E. 1944. Swahili Grammar. London: Longmans.Find this resource:

Asudeh, A. 2001. Linking, Optionality, and Ambiguity in Marathi: An Optimality Theory Analysis. In P. Sells (eds.). Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 257–312.Find this resource:

Austin, P. 1981. A Grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1982. Transitivity and Cognate Objects in Australian languages. In P. J. Hopper and S. A. Thompson (eds.). Studies in Transitivity, Syntax and Semantics, Volume 15. New York: Academic Press. 37–47.Find this resource:

—1995. Double Case Marking in Kanyara and Mantharta Languages, Western Australia. In F. Plank (ed.). Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 363–79.Find this resource:

Authier, G. (n.d.) Eléments de grammaire kryz. Ms.Find this resource:

—2008. Eléments de la langue kryz, dialecte d'Alik. Paris: Société de Linguistique de Paris.Find this resource:

Avrutin, S. 2006. Weak Syntax. In Y. Grodzinsky and K. Amunts (eds.). Broca's Region. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 49–62.Find this resource:

Axvlediani, G. S. (ed.). 1963. Grammatika osetinskogo jazyka. Vol. 1. Ordžonikidze. AznárezFind this resource:

MauleÓN, M. 2005. Approximación desde el Metalenguaje Semántico Natural a la semántica y la pragmática de algunas expresiones de sinceridad del español actual. In M. C. Velarde, R. G. Ruiz, and Ó. L. Lamas (eds.). Estudios sobre lo metalingüistico. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 233–56.Find this resource:

Babby, L. 1980. Existential Sentences and Negation in Russian. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Find this resource:

Babyonyshev, M. 1993. The Acquisition of Russian Case. In C. Phillips (ed.). Papers on Case and Agreement II. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–44.Find this resource:

Bacz, B. 1991. On the Meaning of the Dative in Polish. LACUS forum. 246–55.Find this resource:

Bader, M. and J. Bayer. 2006. Case and Linking in Language Comprehension-Evidence from German. Heidelberg: Springer.Find this resource:

—and M. Meng. 1999. Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses: An Across-the-Board Comparison. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28. 121–43.Find this resource:

Baerman, M. and D. Brown. 2005. Case Syncretism. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 118–21.Find this resource:

(p. 825) ——and G. G. Corbett. 2005. The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, C. L. 1979. Syntactic Theory and the Projection Problem. In Linguistic Inquiry 10. 533–81.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.). Elements of Gram-mar. Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 73–137.Find this resource:

Balke, T. 1999. Kasus im Sumerischen. In Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52.2. 118–29.Find this resource:

—2006. Das sumerische Dimensionalkasussystem. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Find this resource:

Bally, C. 1926. L'Expression des idées de sphère personelle et de solidarité dans les langues indo-européennes. In F. Fankhauser and J. Jud (eds.). Festschrift Louis Gauchat. Aarau: Sauerländer. 68–78.Find this resource:

Baltin, M. and L. Barrett. 2002. The Null Content of Null Case. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.Find this resource:

Barðdal, J. 2001. Case in Icelandic-A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. Lundastudier i Nordisk Språkvetenskap 57. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages.Find this resource:

—2004. The Semantics of the Impersonal Construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond Thematic Roles. In W. Abraham (ed.). Focus on Germanic Typology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 105–37.Find this resource:

—(forthcoming, a) Predicting the Productivity of Argument Structure Constructions. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 32(1).Find this resource:

—(forthcoming, b) ‘The Development of Case in Germanic’, in J. Barðdal and S. Chelliah (eds.). The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—(forthcoming, c). Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Barker, C. 1995. Possessive Descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Barlow, M. and C. A. Ferguson (eds.). 1988. Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.Find this resource:

Baron, I., M. Herslund, and F. Sørensen (eds.). 2001. Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bartens, H.-H. 1989. Lehrbuch der saamischen (lappischen) Sprache. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Find this resource:

Bary, C. and P. de Swart. 2005. Arguments against Arguments: Additional Accusatives in Latin and Ancient Greek. In J. Gervain (ed.). Proceedings of the Tenth Esslli Student Session. 12–24.Find this resource:

Bashir, E. 1999. The Urdu and Hindi Ergative Postposition ne: Its Changing Role in the Grammar. In R. Singh (ed.). The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics. New Delhi: Sage Publications. 11–36.Find this resource:

Bassarak, A. 1988. Morphologisierungstendenzen im Türkischen. In C. Römer (ed.). 2. Jenaer Semantik-Syntax-Symposium. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität. 222–33.Find this resource:

Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney. 1989. Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney, and E. Bates (eds.). The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–76.Find this resource:

(p. 826) Bates, E., B. Wulfeck, and B. MacWhinney. 1991. Cross-linguistic Research in Aphasia: An Overview. In Brain and Language 41. 123–48.Find this resource:

Baugh, A. C. and T. Cable. 1993. A History of the English Language. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Bayer, J. 2004. Non-nominative Subjects in Comparison. In P. Bhaskararao, and K. V. Subbaraou (eds.). Non-Nominative Subjects, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 49–76.Find this resource:

—and J. Kornfilt. 1994. Against Scrambling as an Instance of Move-Alpha. In N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.). Studies on Scrambling; Movement and Non-Movement Ap-proaches to Free Word-Order Phenomena. Berline: Mouton de Gruyter. 17–60.Find this resource:

R. DE Bleser, and C. Dronsek. 1987. Form und Funktion von Kasus bei Agramma-tismus. In J. Bayer (ed.). Grammatik und Kognition. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 1. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. 81–117.Find this resource:

—M. Bader, and M. Meng. (2001). Morphological Underspecification Meets Oblique Case: Syntactic and Processing Effects in German. Lingua 111. 465–514.Find this resource:

Beard, R. 1995. Lexeme Morpheme Base Morphology. Stony Brook, NY: SUNY Press.Find this resource:

Beekes, E. S. P. 1995. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Van Belle, W. and W. Van Langendonck. 1996. The Dative. Volume 1: Descriptive Studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Belyavski-Frank, M. 1983. The Pattern of some (mainly) Morphological Features in Southern Serbian Dialects. In Makedonski jazik. Kn. 34. Skopje. 213–30.Find this resource:

Bennett, P. R. 1974. Tone and the Nilotic Case System. In Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 37(1). 19–28.Find this resource:

Benzing, J. 1955. Lamutische Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Find this resource:

—1985. Kalmückische Grammatik zum Nachschlagen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Berg, T. 1987. The Case Against Accommodation: Evidence from German Speech Error Data. In Journal of Memory and Language 26. 277–99.Find this resource:

Van Den Berg, H. E. 1995. A Grammar of Hunzib (with Texts and Lexicon). Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—2001. Dargi Folktales. Oral Stories From the Caucasus with an Introduction to Dargi Grammar. Leiden: CNWS.Find this resource:

—2005. The East Caucasian Language Family. In Lingua 115. 147–90.Find this resource:

Bergsland, K. 1997. Aleut Grammar: Unangam Tunuganaan Achixaasix. Fairbanks: ANLC (Alaska Native Language Center).Find this resource:

Berndt, R. S., C. C. Mitchum, and A. N. Haendiges. 1996. Comprehension of Reversible Sentences in ‘Agrammatism’: A Meta-analysis. In Cognition 58. 289–308.Find this resource:

Bernhardi, A. -F. 1805. Anfangsgründe der Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin.Find this resource:

Berry, K. and C. Berry. 1999. A Description of Abun: A West Papuan Language of Irian Jaya. Pacific Linguistics B,115. Canberra, Australia: Research School of Pacific and AsianStudies, Australian National University.Find this resource:

Bertolo, S. (ed.) 2001. Language Acquisition and Learnability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bhaskararao, P. and K. V. Subbarao (eds.). 2004. Non-nominative Subjects (Vols. 1&2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bhat, D. N. S. 1994. The Adjectival Category. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—2004. Pronouns. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—and M. S. Ningomba. 1997. Manipuri Grammar. Munich/Newcastle: Lincon.Find this resource:

(p. 827) Bickel, B. 2003. Belhare. In G. Thurgood and R. J. LaPolla (eds.). The Sino-Tibetan Lan-guages. London: Routledge. 546–70.Find this resource:

—2004a. Hidden Syntax in Belhare. A. Saxena (ed.). Himalayan Languages: Past and Present. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 141–90.Find this resource:

—2004b. The Syntax of Experiencers in the Himalayas. In P. Bhaskararao and K. V. Subbarao (eds.). Non-nominative subjects, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 77–113.Find this resource:

—2006. Clause-Level vs. Predicate-Level Linking. In I. Bornkessel, M. Schlesewsky, B. Comrie, and A. D. Friederici (eds.). Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking. 155–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—2007. Typology in the 21st Century: Major Current Developments. In Linguistic Typology 11. 239–51.Find this resource:

—(forthcoming, a). On the Scope of the Referential Hierarchy in the Typology of Grammatical Relations. In G. G. Corbett and M. Noonan (eds.). Case and Grammatical Relations: Papers in Hanour of Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—(forthcoming, b). A Refined Sampling Procedure for Genealogical Control. In Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung.Find this resource:

—(forthcoming, c). Grammatical Relations Typology. In J. J. Song (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—and J. Nichols. 1996 ff. The Autotyp database. Electronic database: http://www.uni-leipzig.de/∼autotyp.Find this resource:

——2003. Typological Enclaves. Paper presented at the 5th Biannual Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Cagliari, 18 September. Available at http://www.uni-leipzig.de/∼autotyp/download.Find this resource:

——2005a. Exponence of Selected Inflectional Formatives. In M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 90–93.Find this resource:

——2005b. Inclusive/Exclusive as Person vs. Number Categories Worldwide. In E. Filimonova (ed.). Clusivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 47–70.Find this resource:

——2005c. Fusion of Selected Inflectional Formatives. In M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.). World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 86–9.Find this resource:

——2006. Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the Theory of Linguistic Areas. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. [PDF available athttp://www.uni-leipzig.de/∼bickel/research/papers.]Find this resource:

——2007. Inflectional Morphology. In T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syn-tactic Description (Revised second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 169–240.Find this resource:

——(forthcoming). Generalizing Alignment Typology. Ms. in preparation.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, M. 1988. On the Grammar of Local Prepositions. In M. Bierwisch et al. (eds.). Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon. Berlin: Akademie. 1–66.Find this resource:

Birnbaum, H. 1965. Balkanslavisch und Südslavisch. In Zeitschrift für Balkanologie. Jg. III. Wiesbaden. 12–63.Find this resource:

Bisang, W. 1992. Das Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Vergleichende Grammatik im Rahmen der Verbserialisierung, der Grammatikalisierung und der Attraktorpositionen. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Bittner, D., W. U. Dressler, and M. Kilani-Schoch (eds.). 2000. First Verbs: On the Way to Mini-paradigms. ZAS Papers in Linguistics18. Berlin: Zentrum für AllgemeineSprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung.Find this resource:

(p. 828) Bittner, D., W. U. Dressler, And M. Kilani-Schoch (eds.). 2003. Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.Find this resource:

Bittner, M. and K. Hale. 1996a. The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement. In Linguistic Inquiry 27. 1–68.Find this resource:

——1996b. Ergativity: Toward a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class. In Linguistic Inquiry 27. 531–604.Find this resource:

Blake, B. J. 1976. On Ergativity and the Notion of Subject. In Lingua 39. 281–300.Find this resource:

—1977. Case Marking in Australian Languages. Aias Linguistic Series 23. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Find this resource:

—1994. Case. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics 32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—2001. Case (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Blanchon, J. A. 1998. Semantic/Pragmatic Conditions on the Tonology of the Kongo Noun-Phrase: A Diachronic Hypothesis. In L. Hyman and C. Kisseberth (eds.). Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Tone. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 1–32.Find this resource:

—1999. Tone Cases in Bantu Group B.40. In J. A. Blanchon, and D. Creissels (eds.). Issues in Bantu Tonology. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe. 37–82.Find this resource:

Blank, A. 2004. Polysemy in the Lexicon and in Discourse. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, and D. D. Clarke (eds.). Polysemy. Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 267–93.Find this resource:

Blansitt, E. L. JR. 1973. Bitransitive Clauses. Working Papers on Language Universals.Find this resource:

—1988. Datives and Allatives. In M. Hammond, E. Moravcsik, and J. Wirth (eds.). Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 173–91.Find this resource:

DE Bleser, R., C. Dronsek, and J. Bayer. 1988. Morphosyntactic Processing in German Agrammatism: A Replication and Revision of von Stockert/Bader (1976). In Cortex 24. 53–76.Find this resource:

—F. Burchert, and P. Rausch. 2005. Breakdown at the Morphological Level in Agrammatism. In Stem-Spraak – Taalpathologie 13. 35–46.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. P. 2005. Word-based Declensions in Estonian. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.). Yearbook of Morphology 2005. Dordrecht: Springer. 1–25.Find this resource:

—2006. Word-based Morphology. In Journal of Linguistics 42. 531–73.Find this resource:

Bloch, J. 1934. L'indo-aryen: du véda aux temps modernes. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.Find this resource:

Blumstein, S. E., G. Byma, K. Kurowski, J. Hourihan, T. Brown, and A. Hutchinson. 1998. On-line Processing of Filler-Gap Constructions in Aphasia. In Brain and Language 61. 149–68.Find this resource:

Blutner, R. 2000. Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17. 189–216.Find this resource:

Boas, F. 1964 [1911]. On Grammatical Categories. In D. Hymes (ed.). Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row. 121–3.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, J. D. 1993a. On Ergativity and Ergative Unergatives. In C. Phillips (ed.). Papers on Case and Agreement II. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19. 45–88.Find this resource:

—1993b. Nominally Absolutive is not Absolutely Nominative. In Proceedings of the Eleventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. University of California, Stanford: Clsi. 44–60.Find this resource:

—2008. Where's phi? Agreement as a Post-syntactic Operation. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, and S. Béjar (eds.). Phi-Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 295–328.Find this resource:

(p. 829) —and P. Branigan. 2006. Eccentric Agreement and Multiple Case Checking. In A. Johns, D. Massam, and J. Ndayiragije (eds.). Ergativity: Emerging Issues. Dordrecht: Springer. 47–77.Find this resource:

Bock, J. K. 1986. Meaning, Sound, and Syntax: Lexical Priming in Sentence Production. In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12. 575–86.Find this resource:

—1987. Coordinating Words and Syntax in Speech Plans. In A. W. Ellis (ed.). Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol.3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 337–90.Find this resource:

—1989. Closed-class Immanencein Sentence Production.In Cognition 31. 163–86.Find this resource:

—1995. Sentence Production: From Mind to Mouth. In J. L. Miller and P. D. Eimas (eds.). Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Speech, Language, and Communication, Vol.11. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 181–216.Find this resource:

—and Z. M. Griffin. 2000. The Persistence of Structural Priming: Transient Activation or Implicit Learning? In Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129. 177–92.Find this resource:

—and W. J. M. Levelt. 1994. Language Production: Grammatical Encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 945–84.Find this resource:

—and H. Loebell. 1990. Framing Sentences. In Cognition 35. 1–39.Find this resource:

——and R. Morey. 1992. From Conceptual Roles to Structural Relations: Bridging the Syntactic Cleft. Psychological Review 99. 150–71.Find this resource:

Boeder, W. 1979. Ergative Syntax and Morphology in Language Change: The South Caucasian Languages. In F. Plank (ed.). Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Academic Press. 435–80.Find this resource:

—1995. Suffixaufnahme in Kartvelian. In F. Plank (ed.). Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: Oxford University Press,151–215.Find this resource:

Bohas., G, J.-P. Guillaume, and D.E. Kouloughli. 1990. The Arabic Linguistic Tradition. London/New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Böhm, R. 1982. Topics in Localist Case Grammar (with special reference to English and Ger-man). DPhil thesis, New University of Ulster.Find this resource:

—1998. Notional Grammar, Wortklassen und Dependenz. (BLicK 7) Bremen: Universität Bremen, IAAS.Find this resource:

—1999. Kategorien, Konfigurationen und ‘Kasus’ in einer notionalen Grammatik. In Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52.2. 207–31.Find this resource:

Bokarev, A. A. 1949a. Sintaksis avarskogo jazyka. Moscow/Leningrad: AN SSSR.Find this resource:

—1949b. Ocherki grammatiki chamalinskogo jazyka. Moscow: AN SSSR.Find this resource:

Borer, H. 1989. On the Morphological Parallelism between Compounds and Constructs. In Yearbook of Morphology I. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 45–65.Find this resource:

—2005. Structuring Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borg, A. and M. Azzopardi-Alexander. 1995. Maltese. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Borgman, D. M. 1990. Sanuma. In D. C. Derbyshire and G. K. Pullum (eds.). Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol.2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 15–248.Find this resource:

Bornkessel, I. and M. Schlesewsky. 2006. The Extended Argument Dependency Model: A Neurocognitive Approach to Sentence Comprehension Across Languages. In Psychological Review 113. 787–821.Find this resource:

——and A. D. Friederici. 2002. Grammar Overrides Frequency: Evidence from the On-line Processing of Flexible Word Order. In Cognition 85(2). B21–B30.Find this resource:

(p. 830) Bornkessel, I., M. Schlesewsky, and A. D. Friederici. 2003. Eliciting Thematic Reanalysis Effects: The Role of Syntax-Independent Information During Parsing. In Language and Cognitive Processes 18. 269–98.Find this resource:

—B. McElree, M. Schlesewsky, and A. D. Friederici. 2004. Multidimensional Contributions to Garden Path Strength: Dissociating Phrase Structure from Case Marking. In Journal of Memory and Language 51: 495–522.Find this resource:

Boškovicć, Ž. 1996. Selection and the Categorial Status of Infinitival Complements. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14. 269–304.Find this resource:

—1997. The Syntax of Non-finite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—2002. A-Movement and the EPP. In Syntax 5. 167–218.Find this resource:

—2005. On the Locality of Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP. In Studia Linguistica 59. 1–45.Find this resource:

—2007. On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: an Even More Minimal Theory. In Linguistic Inquiry. 38. 589–644.Find this resource:

Bossong, G. 1985a. Differenzielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

—1985b. Markierung von Aktantenfunktionen in Guarani. Zur Frage der differenziellen Objektmarkierung in nicht-akkusativischen Sprachen. In F. Plank (ed.). Relational Typol-ogy. Berlin: Mouton. 1–31.Find this resource:

—1985c. Zur Entwicklungsdynamik von Kasussystemen. In Folia Linguistica Historica 6. 285–321.Find this resource:

—1985d. Empirische Universalienforschung. Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Ars linguistica. Commentationes analyticae et criticae14. Tübingen: Gunther Narr Verlag.Find this resource:

—1991. Differential Object Marking in Romance and Beyond. In D. Wanner and D. A. Kibbee (eds.). New Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the XVIII Linguis-tics Symposium on Romance Languages, Urbana-Champaign, April 7–9, 1988. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 143–70.Find this resource:

—1998. Le marquage de l'expérient dans les langues d'Europe. In J. Feuillet (ed.). Actance et valence dans les langues de l'Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 259–94.Find this resource:

Bouchard, D. 1996. Sign Languages and Language Universals: The Status of Order and Position in Grammar. In Sign Language Studies 91. 101–60.Find this resource:

—1998. The Distribution and Interpretation of Adjectives in French: A Consequence of Bare Phrase Structure. In Probus 10. 139–83.Find this resource:

Bowe, H. 1990. Categories, Constituents, and Constituent Order in Pitjantjatjara. London/New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Bowerman, M. 1985. What Shapes Children's Grammars? In D. I. Slobin (ed.). The Crosslin-guistic Study of Language Acquisition. Volume2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1257–1314.Find this resource:

—P. Brown, S. Eisenbeiss, B. Narasimhan, and D. Slobin. 2002. Putting Things in Places: Developmental Consequences of Linguistic Typology. Invited plenary symposium, Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University, April 2002. On-line Proceedings: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/CLRF/2002/CLRF-2002-title.htmlFind this resource:

Braine, M. D. S. 1976. Children's First Word Combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41(1).Find this resource:

—1992. What Sort of Innate Structure is Needed to ‘Bootstrap’ into Syntax? In Cognition 45. 77–100.Find this resource:

(p. 831) Branigan, H. P., M. J. Pickering, and A. A. Cleland. 2000. Syntactic Coordination in dialogue. In Cognition 75. B13–B25.Find this resource:

——J. F. McLean, and A. Stewart. 2006. The Role of Local and Global Syntactic Structure in Language Production: Evidence from Syntactic Priming. Language and Cog-nitive Processes 21. 974–1010.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. 1977. Transformations and Categories in Syntax. In R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.). Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics. Part Three of the Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London, Ontario, Canada, 1975. Dordrecht: Reidel. 261–82.Find this resource:

—(ed.). 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—2000. Optimal Syntax. In J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw, and J. van de Weije (eds.). Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 334–85.Find this resource:

—2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—2006. Is Syntactic Knowledge Probabilistic? Experiments with the English Dative Alternation. Invited paper to appear in the proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence, Tübingen, 2–4 February 2006, Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base. Series: Studies in Generative Grammar, edited by S. Featherston and W. Sternefeld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—andJ. Kanerva. 1989. Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1–50.Find this resource:

—and R. M. Kaplan. 1982. Introduction: Grammars as Mental Representations of Language. In J. Bresnan (ed.). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. xvii-lii.Find this resource:

—and S. A. Mchombo. 1986. Grammatical and Anaphoric Agreement. In A. Farley, P. Farley, and K. McCullough (eds.). Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 22. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. 741–82.Find this resource:

Broadbent, S. 1964. The Southern Sierra Miwok Language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Bromley, M. H. 1981. A Grammar of Lower Grand Valley Dani. Pacific Linguistic Series C. No.63. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Brown, L. 2001. A Grammar of Nias Selatan. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.Find this resource:

Brown, R. 1988. Waris Case System and Verb Classification. In Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 19. 37–80.Find this resource:

—and C. Hanlon. 1970. Derivational Complexity and Order of Acquisition in Child Speech. In J. R. Hayes (ed.). Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: Wiley. 11–53.Find this resource:

Bubeník, V. 1998. A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhramśa). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—(n.d.). On the Evolution of the Hittite System of Postpositions from Proto-Indo-European. Unpublished MS.Find this resource:

Buchholz, O. and W. Fiedler. 1987. Albanische Grammatik. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Find this resource:

Budwig, N. 1989. ‘The Linguistic Marking of Agentivity and Control in Child Language’.Journal of Child Language 16. 263–84.Find this resource:

(p. 832) Bugenhagen, R. 2002. The Syntax of Semantic Primes in Mangaaba-Mbula. In C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Em-pirical Findings. Vol.2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–64.Find this resource:

Bulut, C. 2006. Turkish Elements in Spoken Kurmanji. In H. Boeschoten and L. Johanson (eds.). Turkic Languages in Contact. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 95–121.Find this resource:

Burchert, F., R. De Bleser, and K. Sonntag. 2001. Does Case Make the Difference? Agrammatic Comprehension of Caseinflected Sentences in German. In Cortex 37. 700–2.Find this resource:

———2003. Does Morphology Make the Difference? Agrammatic Sentence Comprehension in German. In Brain and Language 87. 323–42.Find this resource:

Burling, R. 2004. The Language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo). New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia.Find this resource:

Burzio, L. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Auxiliaries. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Buth, R. 1981. Ergative Word Order-Luwo is OVS. In Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages 1. 74–90.Find this resource:

Butt, M. 1995. The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

—1998. Constraining Argument Merger through Aspect. In E. Hinrichs, A. Kathol, and T. Nakazawa (eds.). Complex Predicates in Nonderivational Syntax. New York: Academic Press. 73–113.Find this resource:

—2005. Differential Case Marking Theory (DCT). unpublished MS. available at http://www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/papers/Butt05CaseHO.pdfFind this resource:

—2006. Theories of Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—andT. H. King. 1991. Semantic Case in Urdu. In L. Dobrin, L. Nichols, and R. M. Rodriguez (eds.). Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 31–45.Find this resource:

——2003. Case Systems: Beyond Structural Distinctions. In E. Brandner and H. Zinsmeister (eds.). New Perspectives on Case Theory. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 53–87.Find this resource:

——2004. The Status of Case. In V. Dayal and A. Mahajan (eds.). Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 153–98.Find this resource:

—and A. Varghese. 2004. A Computational Treatment of Differential Case Marking in Malayalam. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON) 2004. Hyderabad.Find this resource:

Butterworth, B. 1980. Some constraints on Models of Language Production. In B. Butterworth (ed.). Language Production, Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press. 423–59.Find this resource:

—and D. Howard. 1987. Paragrammatisms. In Cognition 26. 2–37.Find this resource:

Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—2006. Frequency of Use and the Organisation of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

R. D. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Cadiot, P. 1990. La préposition avec: grammaire et représentation. In Le Français Moderne 58. 152–73.Find this resource:

Cain, B. D. and J. W. Gair. 2000. Dhivehi (Maldivian). Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

(p. 833) Calabrese, A. 1998. Some Remarks on the Latin Case System and its Development in Romance. In J. Lema and E. Treviño (eds.). Theoretical Analyses on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 71–126.Find this resource:

Caramazza, A. and R. S. Berndt. 1985. A Multicomponent Deficit View of Agrammatic Broca's Aphasia. In M. L. Kean (ed.). Agrammatism. Orlando: Academic Press. 27–63.Find this resource:

—and E. Zurif. 1976. Dissociation of Algorithmic and Heuristic Processes in Language Comprehension: Evidence from Aphasia. In Brain and Language 3. 572–82.Find this resource:

—C. Papagno, and W. Ruml. 2000. The Selective Impairment of Phonological Processing in Speech Production. In Brain and Language 75. 428–50.Find this resource:

Cardona, G. 1976a. Panini: A Survey of Research. In W. Winter (ed.). Trends in Linguistics, State-of-the-Art Reports (6). The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—1976b. Subject in Sanskrit. In M. K. Verma (ed.). The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages. Madison: University of Wisconsin, South Asian Studies,1–38.Find this resource:

Carlson, G. 1977. A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural. In Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 413–58.Find this resource:

Carstairs, A. 1984. Outlines of a Constraint on Syncretism. In Folia Linguistica 18. 73–84.Find this resource:

—1987. Allomorphy in Inflection. London/New York/Sydney: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Cecchetto, C. 2004. A Challenge to Null Case Theory. In Linguistic Inquiry 35.1. 141–49.Find this resource:

Ceytlin, S. N. 1989. Child Speech: Innovations of Form and Word Building. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leningrad.Find this resource:

Chadwick, N. 1976. Ergative, Locative and Instrumental Case Inflections – The Western Barkly Languages. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.). Grammatical Categories in Australian Lan-guages. Linguistic Series No.22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies/NewJersey: Humanities Press. 390–6.Find this resource:

Chafe, W. 1971. Meaning and the Structure of Language. University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Chaker, S. 1983. Un parler berbère d'Algérie (Kabylie). Syntaxe. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Université de Provence.Find this resource:

—1988. L'état d'annexion du nom. In Encyclopédie berbère, V. Paris: EDISUD, 686–95.Find this resource:

Chang, F. 2002. Symbolically Speaking: A Connectionist Model of Sentence Production. In Cognitive Science 26. 609–51.Find this resource:

G. S. Dell, K. Bock, andZ. M. Griffin. 2000. Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(2). 217–29.Find this resource:

———2006. Becoming Syntactic. In Psychological Review 113, 2. 234–72.Find this resource:

Chao, Y. R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Chappell, H. 2002. The Universal Syntax of Semantic Primes in Mandarin Chinese. In C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings. Vol.1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 243–322.Find this resource:

—and W. McGregor (eds.). 1995. The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspec-tive on Body Part Terms and the Part-Whole Relation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Charachidzé, G. 1981. Grammaire de la langue avar (langue du Caucase Nord-Est). Paris: Editions Jean-Favard.Find this resource:

Charney, J. O. 1993. A Grammar of Comanche. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Chelliah, S. L. 1997. A Grammar of Meithei. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

(p. 834) Cheung, J. 2008. The Ossetic Case System Revisited. In A. Lubotsky, J. Schaeken, and J. Wiedenhof (eds.), Evidence and Counter-evidence: Essays in honour of Frederik Kortlandt. Vol. I. Balto-slavic and Indo-European Linguistics. (SSGL 32). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 87–105.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper & Row.Find this resource:

—1980. On Binding. In Linguistic Inquiry 11. 1–46.Find this resource:

—1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

—1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—1991. Some Notes on the Economy of Derivation and Representation. In R. Freidin (ed.). Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 417–54.Find this resource:

—1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.). Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89–155.Find this resource:

—2001. Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Find this resource:

—2004. On Phases. Ms., MIT.Find this resource:

—and H. Lasnik. 1977. Filters and Control. In Linguistic Inquiry 8. 425–504.Find this resource:

——1995. The Theory of Principles and Parameters. In N. Chomsky (ed.). The Mini-malist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 13–127Find this resource:

Chouinard, M. M. and E. V. Clark. 2003. Adult Reformulations of Child Errors as Negative Evidence. In Journal of Child Language 30. 637–69.Find this resource:

Christianson, K. and F. Ferreira. 2005. Conceptual Accessibility and Sentence Production in a Free Word Order Language (Odawa). In Cognition 98. 105–35.Find this resource:

Christensen, A. 1921. Les dialectes d'Awromān et de Pāwä. Copenhagen: Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.Find this resource:

—1935. Contributions à la dialectologie iranienne, II, Dialects de la région de Sèmnān: Sourkhéi, Lāsguerdi, Sängesäri et Chämerzådi. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Find this resource:

Christofidou, A. and U. Stephany. 1997. The Early Development of Case Forms in the Speech of a Greek Boy: A Preliminary Investigation. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.). Pre-and Protomorphology in Language Acquisition. Papers and Studies in ContrastiveLinguistics, V. 33. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University. 127–41.Find this resource:

Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss, and A. Vainikka. 1994. The Seeds of Structure. A Syntactic Analysis of the Acquisition of Case Marking. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.). Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 85–118.Find this resource:

——andM. Penke. 1996. Lexical Learning in Early Syntactic Development. In H. Clahsen (ed.). Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition. Empirical Findings, The-oretical Considerations and Cross-linguistic Comparisons. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 129–59.Find this resource:

Cleland, S. and M. Pickering. 2003. The Use of Lexical and Syntactic Information in Language Production: Evidence from the Priming of Noun-phrase Structure. In Journal of Memory and Language 49. 214–30.Find this resource:

(p. 835) Clifton, C., Jr. and L. Frazier. 1989. Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies. In G. N. Carlson and M. K. Tanenhaus (eds.). Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 273–317.Find this resource:

Clyne, M. 2003. Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Colarusso, J. 1992. A Grammar of the Kabardian Language. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Find this resource:

Cole, P. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Lingua Descriptive Studies 5. Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

—1985. Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Collins, C. and H. Thráinsson. 1996. VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic. In Linguistic Inquiry 27. 391–444.Find this resource:

Comrie, B. 1976a. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1976b. The Syntax of Causative Constructions: Cross-language Similarities and Di-vergences. In M. Shibatani (ed.). Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York: Academic Press. 261–312.Find this resource:

—1978. Ergativity. In W. P. Lehmann (ed.). Syntactic Typology. Studies in the Phenomenol-ogy of Language. Austin, London: The University of Texas Press. 329–94.Find this resource:

—1980. The Order of Case and Possessive Suffixes in Uralic Languages: An Approach to the Comparative-historical Problem. In Lingua Posnaniensis 23. 81–6.Find this resource:

—1981a. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—1981b. (with B. G. Hewitt, J. R. Payne). The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1982. Grammatical Relations in Huichol. In P. J. Hopper and S. A. Thompson (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 15: Studies in Transitivity. New York/London: Academic Press. 95–115.Find this resource:

—1984. Case and Agreement in Hindi and Related Languages. In Linguistics 22. 857–64.Find this resource:

—1985. Causative Verb Formation and Other Verb-deriving Morphology. In T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 309–48.Find this resource:

—1986. On Delimiting Cases. In R. D. Brecht and J. S. Levine (eds.). Case in Slavic. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers, Inc., 86–106.Find this resource:

—1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—1991. Form and Function in Identifying Cases. In F. Plank (ed.). Paradigms: The Econ-omy of Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 41–55.Find this resource:

—1999. Spatial Cases in Daghestanian Languages. In Sprachtypologie und Universalien-forschung 52. 108–17.Find this resource:

—2005. Alignment of Case Marking. In M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 398–405.Find this resource:

—and M. S. Polinsky. 1998. The Great Daghestanian case hoax. In A. Siewierska and J. J. Song (eds.). Case, Typology and Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 95–114.Find this resource:

——and R. Rajabov. 1998. Tsezian languages. In A. Harris and R. Smets (eds.). The Languages of the Caucasus. London: Curzon.Find this resource:

G. Stone, and M. S. Polinsky. 1996. The Russian Language in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 836) Cook, K. W. 1988. A Cognitive Analysis of Grammatical Relations, Case, and Transitivity in Samoan. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Find this resource:

Cook, W. A. 1989. Case Grammar Theory. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Find this resource:

Corbett, G. G. 1983. Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers. Agreement Patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

———2003. Agreement: The Range of the Phenomenon and the Principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. In Transactions of the Philological Society 101. 155–202.Find this resource:

—2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Corley, M. and C. Scheepers. 2002. Syntactic Priming in English Sentence Production: Categorical and Latency Evidence from an Internet-based Study. In Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9. 126–31.Find this resource:

Cover, T. M. and J. A. Thomas. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Find this resource:

Cowper, E. 1988. What is a Subject? Non-nominative Subjects in Icelandic. In J. Blevins and J. Carter (eds.). Proceedings of NELS, GLSA, Amherst. 94–108.Find this resource:

Crain, S. 1991. Language Acquisition in the Absence of Experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14. 597–611.Find this resource:

—and J. D. Fodor 1985. How can Grammars Help Parsers? In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.). Natural Language Parsing. Psychological, Computational and Theo-retical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 94–129.Find this resource:

Crass, J. 2005. Das K'abeena-Deskriptive Grammatik einer hochlandostkuschitischen Sprache. Cushitic Language Studies, 23. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Crazzolara, J. P. 1960. A Study of the Logbara (Ma'di) Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Creissels, D. 2006a. Encoding the Distinction between Location, Source, and Destination: A Typological Study. In M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds.). Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 19–28.Find this resource:

—2006b. Cas et postpositions en hongrois. In Bulletin de la société de linguistique de Paris, 101. 225–72.Find this resource:

Croft, W. 1988. Agreement vs. Case Marking and Direct Objects. In M. Barlow and C. A. Ferguson (eds.). Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 159–79.Find this resource:

—1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Crowley, T. 1998a. An Erromangan (Sye) Grammar: Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, no. 27. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Find this resource:

—1998b. Ura. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Csató, É. Á. 2000. Syntactic code-copying in Karaim. In Ö. Dahl and M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.). The Circum-Baltic Languages: Their Typology and Contacts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 270–83.Find this resource:

Csúcs, S. 1998. Udmurt. In D. Abondolo (ed.). The Uralic Languages. London: Routledge, 276–304.Find this resource:

Culicover, P. W. andR. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 837) Culy, C. 1995. Ambiguity and Case Marking in Donno So (Dogon). In A. Akinalabi (ed.). Theoretical Approaches to African Linguistics. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press. 47–58.Find this resource:

Curnow, T. J. 1997. A Grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An Indigenous Language of South-western Colombia. PhD Thesis. Australian National University.Find this resource:

Cyhun G. A. 1981. Tipologičeskie problemy balkanoslavjanskogo areala. Minsk: Navukai tehnika.Find this resource:

Cysouw, M. 2005. Quantitative Methods in Typology. In G. Altmann, R. Köhler, and R. Piotrowski (eds.). Quantitative Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 554–78.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, E. and M. Szczerbiński. 2006. Polish Children's Productivity with Case Marking: The Role of Regularity, Type Frequency, and Phonological Diversity. Journal of Child Language 33. 559–97.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, M. 1993. The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

—(ed.). 1999. Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Find this resource:

—2001. Lexical Functional Grammar. Syntax and Semantics Volume 34. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—and I. Nikolaeva. 2006. Topicality and Non-subject Marking: Agreement, Case-marking, and Grammatical Function. Ms., Oxford University.Find this resource:

Daniel, M. A. 2001. Imja suščestvitel'noe. In A. E. Kibrik et al. (eds.). Bagvalinskij jazyk: Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari. Moscow: Nasledie. 127–50.Find this resource:

—2002. Bagvalinskie toponimy kak problema tipologii častej reči. In V. Plungian (ed.). Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki 2. Grammatikalizacija prostranstvennyx značenij. Moscow.Find this resource:

—Maisak, T. and S. Merdanova. (to appear). Causatives in Agul. In B. Comrie, V. Solovyes, and P. Suikhonen (eds.). Selected Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Typology of Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia (LENCA-2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Davidse, K. and B. Lamiroy (eds.). 2002. The Nominative and Accusative and their Coun-terparts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1967. The Logical Form of Action Sentences. In N. Rescher (ed.). The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 81–95.Find this resource:

Davison, A. 1999. Ergativity: Functional and Formal Issues. In M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley (eds.). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Volume I: General Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 177–208.Find this resource:

Dayley, J. P. 1985. Tzutujil Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

—1989. Tümpisa (Panamint) Shoshone Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

DeLancey, S. 1991. Event Construal and Case Role Assignment. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 17. 338–53.Find this resource:

—2003. Classical Tibetan. In G. Thurgood and R. J. LaPolla (eds.). The Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Routledge. 255–69.Find this resource:

Delbrück, B. 1867. Ablativ localis instrumentalis im Altindischen. Berlin: Dümmler.Find this resource:

Dell, G. S. 1986. A Spreading Activation Theory of Retrieval in Language Production. In Psychological Review 93. 283–321.Find this resource:

F. Chang, and Z. M. Griffin. 1999. Connectionist Models of Language Production: Lexical Access and Grammatical Encoding. In Cognitive Science 23. 517–42.Find this resource:

(p. 838) Delsing, L.-O. 1991. Om Genitivens Utveckling i Fornsvenskan [On the Development of the Genitive in Old Swedish]. In S.-G. Malmgren and B. Ralph (eds.). Studier i Svensk Språkhistoria 2. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. 12–30.Find this resource:

Dench, A. C. 1995. Martuthunira: a Language of the Pilbara Region of Western Australia (Pacific Linguistics C125). Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

—1998. The Dative Split in Martuthunira. In Proceedings of the Australian Linguistics Society Meeting 1998. Available at 〈http://www.cltr.uq.edu.au/als98/〉.Find this resource:

—2006. Case Marking Strategies in Subordinate Clauses in Pilbara Languages: Some Diachronic Speculations. In Australian Journal of Linguistics 26. 81–105.Find this resource:

—and N. Evans 1988. Multiple Case-marking in Australian Languages. In Australian Journal of Linguistics 8. 1–47.Find this resource:

Denwood, P. 1999. Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Deo, A. and D. Sharma. 2006. Typological Variation in the Ergative Morphology of Indo-Aryan Languages. In Linguistic Typology 10. 369–418.Find this resource:

Déprez, V. 1989. On the Typology of Syntactic Projections and the Nature of Chains: Move-a to the Specifier of Functional Projections. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Derdrick, J. M. and E. H. Casad. 1999. Sonora Yaqui Language Structures. Tucson: University of Arizona.Find this resource:

Detges U. (forthcoming). How useful is Case Morphology? The Loss of the Old French Two-case System within a Theory of Preferred Argument Structure. In J. BarDdal and S. Chelliah (eds.). The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Dickins, P. (n.d.). Ju|'hoan Grammar. Unpublished ms.Find this resource:

Dik, S. C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. 2nd. rev. ed. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Diller, A. V. N. 1997. Does Thai Permit Detransitivity? In A. S. Abramson (ed.). South-east Asian Linguistic Studies in Honour of Vichin Panupong. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. 57–78.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. J. 1983. The Turkana Language. Publications in African Languages and Linguistics 2. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

—2003. Locatives as Core Constituents. In E. Shay and U. Seibert (eds.). Motion, Direc-tion and Location in Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 91–109.Find this resource:

—and M. Last (eds.). 1998. Surmic Languages and Cultures. Nilo-Saharan 13 Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1979. Ergativity. In Language 55. 59–138.Find this resource:

—1980. The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—2000. A Typology of Causatives: Form, Syntax and Meaning. In R. M. W. Dixon and A. Aikhenvald (eds.). Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 30–83.Find this resource:

—2002. Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—and A. Y. Aikhenvald. 2000. Introduction. In R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–29.Find this resource:

Donaldson, T. 1980. Ngiyambaa, the Language of the Wangaaybuwan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 839) Donegan, P. J. and D. Stampe. 1983. Rhythm and the Holistic Organization of Language Structure. In J. F. Richardson, M. Marks, and A. Chukerman (eds.). Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Chicago: ChicagoLinguistic Society. 337–53.Find this resource:

Donohue, M. 1999. A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Grammar Library Series No. 20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—2002. Voice in Tukang Besi and the Austronesian Voice System. In F. Wouk and M. Ross (eds.). The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 518. 81–99.Find this resource:

—2004. Voice Oppositions Without Voice Morphology. In P. Law (ed.). Proceedings of AFLA 11, ZAS, Berlin 2004. ZAS Papers in Linguistics Nr. 34– October2004. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Typologie und Universalienforschung. 73–88.Find this resource:

—2005a. Configurationality in the Languages of New Guinea. In Australian Journal of Linguistics 25. 237–74.Find this resource:

—2005b. Structure is not Syntax: Passive Functions in Tukang Besi. In J. Heinz and D. Ntelitheos (eds.). Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Austrone-sian Formal Linguistics Association. University of California at Los Angeles Working Papers in Linguistics 12. 73–89. Available on-line at http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/faciliti/wpl/issues/wpl12/wpl12.htmFind this resource:

—2006. Verb-initial in Nonverbal Clauses? Paper presented to the 13th Annual Conference of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.Find this resource:

—2007. Stative-Active Systems: What's What and What's Not. In M. Donohue and S. Wichmann (eds.). Typology of Languages with Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 24–75.Find this resource:

—and L. Brown. 1999. Ergativity: Some Additions from Indonesia. In Australian Journal of Linguistics 19. 57–76.Find this resource:

—Donohue, M. and S. Wichmann (eds.). 2007. Typology of Languages with Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

—1982. Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar. In G. K. Pullum and P. Jacobson (eds.). The Nature of Syntactic Representation. Dordrecht: Reidel. 79–130.Find this resource:

—1989. On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’. In G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.). Properties, Types and Meanings, 2: Semantic Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 69–129.Find this resource:

—1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. In Language 67. 547–619.Find this resource:

Drai, D. and Y. Grodzinsky. 2006. A New Empirical Angle on the Variability Debate: Quantitative Neurosyntactic Analyses of a Large Data Set from Broca's Aphasia. In Brain and Language 76. 117–28.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. U. (ed.). 1997. Studies in Pre- and Protomorphology. Vienna: Verlag der Öster-reicheschen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. U. 2005. Morphological Typology and First Language Acquisition: Some Mutual Challenges. In G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi, and S. Scalise (eds.). MMM4 Proceedings: Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003.http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm/proc-mmm4.phpFind this resource:

—and A. Karpf. 1995. The Theoretical Relevance of Pre- and Protomorphology in Language Acquisition. Yearbook of Morphology 1994. 99–124.Find this resource:

(p. 840) van Driem, G. 1987. A Grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

— 1993. A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Drossard, W. 1991. Verbklassen. In H. Seiler and W. Premper (eds.). Partizipation: das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten. Tübingen: Narr. 150–82.Find this resource:

Dryer, M. S. 1986. Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative. In Language 62. 808–45.Find this resource:

—1989. Large Linguistic Areas and Language Sampling. In Studies in Language 13. 257–92.Find this resource:

—2002. Case Distributions, Rich Agreement and Word Order Type. In Theoretical Linguistics 28. 151–7.Find this resource:

—2005a. Prefixing Versus Suffixing in Inflectional Morphology. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 110–13.Find this resource:

— 2005b. Position of Case Affixes. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 210–13.Find this resource:

— 2005c. The Relationship between the Order of Object and Verb and the Order of Adposition and Noun Phrase. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 386–9.Find this resource:

—2007. Clause Types. In: T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 224–75.Find this resource:

Dubnova, Y. Z. 1984. The Rwanda Language. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Du Bois, J. W. 1985. Competing Motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.). Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 343–66.Find this resource:

—1987. The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. In Language 63. 805–55.Find this resource:

Dunn, J. A. 1979. A Reference Grammar for the Coast Tsimshian Language. Canadian Ethnology Service, Mercury Series Paper No. 55. Ottawa: National Museum of Man.Find this resource:

Durie, M. 1995. Towards an Understanding of Linguistic Evolution and the Notion ‘X has a function Y’. In W. Abraham, T. Givón, and S. A. Thompson (eds.). Discourse Grammar and Typology (Papers in Honour of JohnW. M. Verhaar). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 275–309.Find this resource:

Džaukjan (Djahukian), G. B. 1982. Sravnitel'naja grammatika armjanskogo jazyka [A comparative grammar of Armenian]. Erevan: AN ArmSSR.Find this resource:

Ebeling, C. L. 1966. Review of Chikobava and Cercvadze's ‘The Grammar of Literary Avar’. In Studia Caucasica 2. 58–100.Find this resource:

Ebert, K. 1997a. Camling. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—1997b. A Grammar of Athpare. Munich: LincomFind this resource:

Ėdel'man, D. I. 1966. Jazguljamskij jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

—1983. The Dardic and Nuristani Languages. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Edzard, D. O. 2003. Sumerian Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Find this resource:

Eisenbeiss, S. 1994a. Auxiliaries and the Acquisition of the Passive. In The Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 235–42.Find this resource:

—. Kasus und Wortstellungsvariation im deutschen Mittelfeld; theoretische überlegungen und Untersuchungen zum Erstspracherwerb. In B. Haftka (ed.). Was determiniert Wortsellungsvariationen? Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 277–98.Find this resource:

— 2000. The Acquisition of the Determiner Phrase in German Child Language. In M.-A. Friedemann, and L. Rizzi (eds.). The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics. London: Longman. 26–62.Find this resource:

(p. 841) — 2003. Merkmalsgesteuerter Grammatikerwerb. PhD dissertation, University of Düsseldorf. (Available at http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=97646330x&dok_var= d1&dok_ext=pdf&filename=97646330x.pdf)Find this resource:

S. Bartke, and H. Clahsen. 2006. Structural and Lexical Case in Child German: Evidence from Language-Impaired and Typically-Developing Children. In Language Ac-quisition 13. 3–32.Find this resource:

Elfenbein, J. 1990. An Anthology of Classical and Modern Balochi Literature. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Find this resource:

Emonds, J. 1985. A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

—1987. The Invisible Category Principle. In Linguistic Inquiry 18. 613–32.Find this resource:

Enç, M. 1991. The Semantics of Specificity. In Linguistic Inquiry 22. 1–25.Find this resource:

Enfield, N. J. 2002. Combinatoric Properties of Natural Semantic Metalanguage Expressions in Lao. In C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings. Vol.2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 145–256.Find this resource:

— 2005. Areal Linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. In Annual Review of Anthropology 34. 181–206.Find this resource:

— 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Engelberg, S. 2000. Verben, Ereignisse und das Lexikon. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

England, N. C. 1983. A Grammar of Mam, a Mayan Language. Austin: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

—1988. Mam Voice. In M. Shibatani (ed.). Passive and Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 525–46.Find this resource:

Epstein, S. D. and T. D. Seely. 2006. Derivations in Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Erelt, M., T. Erelt, and K. Ross. 2000. Eesti keele käsiraamat. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Find this resource:

Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport (eds.). 2005. The Syntax of Aspect. Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Evans, N. R. 1985. Kayardild: The Language of the Bentinck Islanders of North-west Queens-land. PhD thesis, Australian National University.Find this resource:

— 1995a. A Grammar of Kayardild. With Comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

— 1995b. Multiple Case in Kayardild: Anti-iconic Suffix Ordering and the Diachronic Filter. In F. Plank (ed.). Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 396–428.Find this resource:

— and R. Nordlinger. 2004. Extreme Morphological Shift: Verbal Case in Kayardild. Talk presented at the LFG04 meeting, Christchurch, New Zealand, July 2004. Unpublished ms., University of Melbourne.Find this resource:

Eythórsson, T. 2002. Changes in Subject Case-Marking in Icelandic. In D. Lightfoot (ed.). Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 196–212.Find this resource:

Fajzov, M. 1966. Jazyk rushancev Sovetskogo Pamira. Dushanbe: Akademija nauk Tadzhikskoj SSSR.Find this resource:

Falk, C. 1997. Fornsvenska Upplevarverb [Experiencer verbs in Old Swedish]. Lund: Lund University Press.Find this resource:

Falk, Y. N. 1997. Case Typology and Case Theory. Ms., Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Find this resource:

Faust, N. 1973. Lecciones para el aprendizaje del idioma Shipibo-Conibo [Lessons in Shipibo-Conibo]. Documento de Trabajo, 1. Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Find this resource:

(p. 842) Feldman, H. 1986. A Grammar of Awtuw. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Felix, R. 2005. A Grammar of River Walihío. PhD Thesis. Rice University.Find this resource:

Felix, S. W. 1987. Cognition and Language Growth. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

— 1992. Language Acquisition as Maturational Process. In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck, and T. Roeper (eds.). Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 25–51.Find this resource:

Feoktistov, A. P. 1966. Erzjanskij jazyk. In Jazyki Narodov SSSR, Vol. 3. Moscow: Nauka, 177–98.Find this resource:

Ferreira, F. 1994. The Creation of Prosody during Sentence Production. In Psychological Review 100. 233–53.Find this resource:

— 2000. Syntax in Language Production: An Approach using Tree-adjoining Grammars. In L. R. Wheeldon (ed.). Aspects of Language Production. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 291–330.Find this resource:

—and B. Swets. 2002. How Incremental is Language Production? Evidence from the Production of Utterances Requiring the Computation of Arithmetic Sums. In Journal of Memory and Language 46. 57–84.Find this resource:

Ferreira, V. S. 1996. Is it Better to Give than to Donate? The Consequences of Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production. In Journal of Memory and Language 35. 724–55.Find this resource:

— and G. S. Dell. 2000. Effects of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production. In Cognitive Psychology 40. 296–340.Find this resource:

Fife, J. and G. King. 1998. Celtic (Indo-European). In A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds.). Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 477–99.Find this resource:

Filliozat, P.-S. 1988. Grammaire Sanskrite Pâninéenne. Paris: Picard.Find this resource:

Fillmore, C. J. 1965. Toward a Modern Theory of Case. Project on Linguistic Analysis, Ohio State University 13. 1–24. [Reprinted in: D. A. Reibel and S. A. Schane (eds.). Modern Studies in English. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,1969. 361–75.]Find this resource:

—1966. A Proposal concerning English Prepositions. In Georgetown University Mono-graph Series on Languages and Linguistics 19. 19–33.Find this resource:

—1968. The Case for Case. In E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.). Universals of Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1–90.Find this resource:

— 1972. Subjects, Speakers, and Roles. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.). Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel. 1–24.Find this resource:

— 1977. The Case for Case Reopened. In P. Cole and J. Sadock (eds.). Syntax and Seman-tics: Grammatical Relations, Volume 8. New York: Academic Press. 59–91.Find this resource:

P. Kay, and M. C. O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone. In Language 64.3. 501–38.Find this resource:

Fleming, H. C. 1976. Omotic Overview. In M. Bender (ed.). The Non-Semitic Lan-guages of Ethiopia. East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University. 299–323.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. D. 1978. Parsing Strategies and Constraints on Transformations. In Linguistic Inquiry 9. 427–73.Find this resource:

Foley, W. A. 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

— 1991. The Yimas Language of New Guinea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

— 1998. Symmetrical Voice Systems and Precategoriality in Philippine Languages. Paper presented at the LFG98 Conference, Brisbane.Find this resource:

(p. 843) —2000. The Languages of New Guinea. In Annual Review of Anthropology 29. 357–404.Find this resource:

— and R. D. Van Valin, Jr 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Fong, V. 1997. The Order of Things: What Directional Locatives Denote. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Foris, D. P. 2000. A Grammar of Sochiapan Chinantec. Studies in Chinantec Languages 6. Arlington: SIL International and The University of Texas at Arlington.Find this resource:

Forssman, B. 2001. Lettische Grammatik. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 20. Dettelbach: Röll.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. 1984. West Greenlandic. Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Foulet, L. 1970. Petite syntaxe de l'ancien français. 3rd rev. edn. Paris: Champion.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. 2002. A Grammar of Hdi. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Franck, J., G. Lassi, U. H. Frauenfelder, and L. Rizzi. 2006. Agreement and Movement: A Syntactic Analysis of Attraction. In Cognition 101. 173–216.Find this resource:

Frank, P. S. 1990. Ika Syntax. Studies in the languages of Colombia 1. Arlington, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Frank, R. 1992. Syntactic Locality and Tree Adjoining Grammar: Grammatical, Acquisition and Processing Perspectives. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Fraurud, K. 2001. Possessives with Extensive Use: A Source of Definite Articles? In I. Baron, M. Herslund, and F. Sørensen (eds.). Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 243–67.Find this resource:

Frazier, L. 1979. On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Find this resource:

— 1987. Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Dutch. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5. 519–59.Find this resource:

— and K. Rayner. 1982. Making and Correcting Errors During Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences. In Cognitive Psychology 14. 178–210.Find this resource:

Freidin, R. and R. A. Sprouse. 1991. Lexical Case Phenomena. In R. Freidin (ed.). Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 392–416.Find this resource:

Frey, W. 2001. About the Whereabouts of Indefinites. In Theoretical Linguistics 27. 137–61.Find this resource:

Friederici, A. D. and A. Mecklinger. 1996. Syntactic Parsing as Revealed by Brain Responses: First-Pass and Second-Pass Parsing Processes. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25. 157–76.Find this resource:

Friedmann, N. 2001. Agrammatism and the Psychological Reality of the Syntactic Tree. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30. 71–90.Find this resource:

— 2006. Speech Production in Broca's Agrammatic Aphasia: Syntactic Tree Pruning. In Y. Grodzinsky and K. Amunts (eds.). Broca's Region. New York: Oxford University Press. 63–82.Find this resource:

—and L. Shapiro. 2003. Agrammatic Comprehension of Simple Active Sentences with Moved Constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS Structures. In Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 46. 288–97.Find this resource:

Fromkin, V. A. 1971. The Non-anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances. In Language 47. 27–52.Find this resource:

— 1973. Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Fry, J. 2003. Ellipsis and wa-marking in Japanese Conversation. New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

(p. 844) Fukui, N. and M. Speas. 1986. Specifiers and Projection. In N. Fukui, T. R. Rapoport, and E. Sagey (eds.). Papers in Theoretical Linguistics. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 128–72.Find this resource:

Gair, J. W.1990. Subjects, Case and INFL in Sinhala. In M. Verma and K. P. Mohanan (eds.). Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford: CSLI. 13–42.Find this resource:

Galand, L. 1964. L'énoncé verbal en berbère. In Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 21. 33–53.Find this resource:

Ganenkov, D. S. 2005. Kontaktnye lokalizacii v naxsko-dagestanskix jazykax i ix tipologičeskie paralleli. PhD thesis. State University of Moscow.Find this resource:

— 2006. Experiencer Coding in Nakh-Daghestanian. In L. Kulikov et al. (eds.). Case, Valency and Transitivity. Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 179–202.Find this resource:

T. Maisak, and S. Merdanova. 2006. Non-Canonical Agent Marking in Agul. Ms., Moscow State University.Find this resource:

Garnsey, S., M. K. Tanenhaus, and R. Chapman. 1989. Evoked Potentials and the Study of Sentence Comprehension. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18. 51–60.Find this resource:

Garrett, A. 1990. The Origin of NP Split Ergativity. In Language 66. 261–96.Find this resource:

Garrett, M. F. 1975. The Analysis of Sentence Production. In G. H. Bower (ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol.9. New York: Academic Press. 133–77.Find this resource:

— 1980. Levels of Processing in Sentence Production. In B. Butterworth (ed.). Language Production, Vol.1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press. 177–220.Find this resource:

Gary, J. O. and S. Gamal-Eldin. 1982. Cairene Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Gasser, M. 1983. Topic Continuity in Written Amharic Narrative. In T. Givón (ed.). Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 95–139.Find this resource:

Gauto Bejarano, M. G. 1990. Introducción a la gramática elemental del guaraní. Asunción: El Foro.Find this resource:

Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. K. Pullum, and I. Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Gram-mar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

van Geenhoven, V. 1996. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen.Find this resource:

van Gelderen, V. 2003. Scrambling Unscrambled. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Find this resource:

Genetti, C. 1991. From Postposition to Subordinator in Newari. In E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization, Volume 2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 227–55.Find this resource:

Gensler, O. 2002. Order of Double Objects. In Linguistic Typology 6. 35–79.Find this resource:

Georg, S. 1996. Marphatan Thakali: Untersuchungen zur Sprache des Dorfes Marpha im Oberen Kali-Gandaki-Tal/Nepal. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Geschwind, N. 1965. Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man. In Brain 88. 585–644.Find this resource:

van Gestel, F., J. N. Twilhaar, T. Rinkel, and F. Weerman. 1992. Oude zinnen; grammat-icale analyse van het Nederlands tussen 1200–1700. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff.Find this resource:

Gil, D. 2005a. Isolating-Monocategorial-Associational Language. In H. Cohen and C. Lefebvre (eds.). Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 348–80.Find this resource:

(p. 845) — 2005b. Word Order without Syntactic Categories: How Riau Indonesian Does It. In A. Carnie, S. D. Collberg, and H. Harley (eds.). Verb First: Papers on the Syntax of Verb Initial Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 243–63.Find this resource:

Gildersleeve, B. L. and G. Lodge. 1968. Latin Grammar (3rd edition). London: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Givón, T. 1975. Serial Verbs and Syntactic Change: Niger-Congo. In C. Li (ed.). Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin/London: University of Texas Press. 47–111.Find this resource:

—1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—1980. Ute Reference Grammar. Ignacio, CO: Ute Press.Find this resource:

—1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—1985. Ergative Morphology and Transitivity Gradients in Newari. In F. Plank (ed.). Relational Typology. Berlin: Mouton. 89–107.Find this resource:

—1988. The Pragmatics of Word Order: Predictability, Importance and Attention. In M. Hammond et al. (eds.). Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 243–84.Find this resource:

—1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—2001. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—2006. Multiple Routes to Clause Union: the Diachrony of Syntactic Complexity. Ms. Eugene, University of Oregon.Find this resource:

Gladkova, A. (forthcoming). Russian Emotions, Attitudes and Values: Selected Topics in Cultural Semantics. PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Goddard, C. 1982. Case Systems and Case Marking in Australian Languages: A New Interpretation. In Australian Journal of Linguistics 2. 167–96.Find this resource:

—1998. Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—2003. Dynamic -ter in Malay (Bahasa Melayu): A study in grammatical polysemy. In Studies in Language 27. 287–322.Find this resource:

—and A. Wierzbicka. 1994. Introducing Lexical Primitives. In C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.). Semantic and Lexical Universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 31–54.Find this resource:

——(eds.). 2002a. Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings. 2 volumes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

——2002b. Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar. In C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings, vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 41–86.Find this resource:

——2007. Semantic Primes and Cultural Scripts in Language Learning and Intercul-tural Communication. In F. Sharifian and G. Palmer (eds.). Applied Cultural Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 105–24.Find this resource:

Godel, R. 1975. An Introduction to the Study of Classical Armenian. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Find this resource:

Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Goodglass, H. and E. Kaplan. 1983. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders (2nd edition). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Find this resource:

Gordon, L. 1986. Maricopa Morphology and Syntax. University of California Publications in Linguistics, 108. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Gorelova, L. M. 2002. Manchu Grammar. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Find this resource:

(p. 846) Gramatika 1982–1983. Gramatika na s˘avremennija b˘algarski knižoven ezik: v tri toma. S. Stojanov (eds.). Sofia: Balgarskata˘ akademija na naukite.Find this resource:

Grashchenkov, P. V. 2006. Sintaksis i tipologija genitivnoj gruppy. PhD dissertation, Moscow State University.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. 1959. The Origin of the Maasai Passive. In Africa 29. 171–6.Find this resource:

—1963. The Languages of Africa. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—1966. Some Universals of Grammar, with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language (2nd edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT. 73–113.Find this resource:

Greenfield, S. 2001. Brain Story. Baarn: Bosch & Keuning.Find this resource:

Grégoire, C. 1975. Les locatifs en Bantou. Tervuren: Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale.Find this resource:

Gregores, E. and J. A. Suárez. 1967. A Description of Colloquial Guaraní. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Grenand, F. 1980. La langue wayãpi (Guyane française). Phonologie et grammaire. Paris: SELAF.Find this resource:

Grewendorf, G. and J. Sabel. 1999. Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction versus Multiple Specifiers. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 1–86.Find this resource:

Gries, S. 2005. Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34. 365–99.Find this resource:

Grimm, S. 2005. The Lattice of Case and Agentivity. MA Thesis, University of Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, J. B. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Grjunberg, A. L. 1963. Jazyk Severoazerbajdžanskix Tatov. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Find this resource:

—1980. Jazyk kati. [The Kati Language.] Moscow: Vostocnajaˇ Literatura.Find this resource:

—and D. I. Èdel'man. 1987. Afganskij Jazyk. In: Osnovy iranskogo jazykoznanija, Vol. 4: Novoiranskie jazyki: vostoˇcnaja gruppa. Moscow: Nauka. 6–154.Find this resource:

Grodzinsky, Y. 1990. Theoretical Perspectives on Language Deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—2000. The Neurology of Syntax: Language Use without Broca's Area. In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23. 1–71.Find this resource:

—and L. Finkel. 1998. The Neurology of Empty Categories: Aphasics' Failure to Detect Ungrammaticality. In Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10. 281–92.Find this resource:

K. Wexler, Y. C. Chien, S. Marakovitz, and J. Solomon. 1993. The Breakdown of Binding Relations. In Brain and Language 45. 396–422.Find this resource:

de Groot, A. W. 1939. Les oppositions dans les systèmes de la syntaxe et des cas. In Mélanges de linguistique offerts à Charles Bally. Geneva: Georg. 107–27.Find this resource:

Gruber, J. S. 1965. Studies in Lexical Relations. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. [Published as Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam,1976.]Find this resource:

Gruber-Miller, A. M. 1990. Loss of Nominal Case Endings in the Modern Arabic Sedentary Dialects: Evidence from Southern Palestinian Christian Middle Arabic Texts. In M. Eid (ed.). Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics I: Papers from the First Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 235–53.Find this resource:

Grünthal, R. 2003. Finnic Adpositions and Cases in Change. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Find this resource:

Gruzdeva, E. 1998. Nivkh. Lincom/Materials, 111. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Guerrero, L. and R. D. Van Valin, Jr. 2004. Yaqui and the Analysis of Primary Object Languages. In International Journal of American Linguistics 70. 290–319.Find this resource:

(p. 847) Guilfoyle, E., H. Hung, and L. Travis. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10. 375–414.Find this resource:

Guillaume, A. 2004. A Grammar of Cavineña, an Amazonian Language of Northern Bolivia. PhD thesis, Research Centre for Linguistic Typology. La Trobe University (Melbourne, Australia).Find this resource:

Gukasian, V. 1974. Udinsko-azerbajdžansko-russkij slovar'. Baku: Elm.Find this resource:

Gumperz, J. J. and R. Wilson. 1971. Convergence and Creolization: A Case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian Border in India. In D. Hymes (ed.). Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 151–67.Find this resource:

Gvozdanović, J. 1997. Tracing the Origin of a Change. In J. Gvozdanović (ed.). Language Change and Functional Explanation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 71–87.Find this resource:

Gvozdev, A. N. 1961. Voprosy izuˇcenija detskoj reˇci [Questions of the study of child language]. Moscow: Prosvešceniĕ.Find this resource:

Hagège, C. 1993. The Language Builder. An Essay on the Human Structure in Linguistic Morphogenesis. Amsterdam/Phildelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Hagiwara, H. and D. Caplan. 1990. Syntactic Comprehension in Japanese Aphasics: Effects of Category and Thematic Role Order. In Brain and Language 38. 159–70.Find this resource:

Hagman, R. S. 1973. Nama Hottentot Grammar. Columbia University.Find this resource:

Hagoort, P., C. M. Brown, and T. Y. Swaab. 1996. Lexical-semantic Event-Related Potential Effects in Patients with Left Hemisphere Lesions and Aphasia, and Patients with Right Hemisphere Lesions without Aphasia. In Brain 119. 627–49.Find this resource:

Haider, H. 1993. Deutsche Syntax-Generativ. Vorstudien zu einer Projektiven Theorie der Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

—2006. Mittelfeld Phenomena. (Scrambling in Germanic) In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Vol. 3. Oxford: Blackwell. 204–74.Find this resource:

—and I. Rosengren. 1998. Scrambling. Sprache und Pragmatik 49. Lund.Find this resource:

Haig, G. 2001. Linguistic Diffusion in Present-day East Anatolia: From Top to Bottom. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.). Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 195–224.Find this resource:

—2008. Alignment Shift in Iranian languages. Berlin: Mouton.Find this resource:

Haile, G. 1970. The Suffix Pronouns in Amharic. In C.-W. Kim and H. Stahlke (eds.). Papers in African Linguistics. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc. 101–11.Find this resource:

Haiman, J. (ed.). 1985. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Hakulinen, L. 1961. The Structure and Development of the Finnish Language. Bloomington: Indiana University; The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Hale, K. 1973. Person Marking in Walbiri. In S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson. 308–44.Find this resource:

—1981. Preliminary Remarks on the Grammar of Part-Whole Relations in Warlpiri. In J. Hollyman and A. Pawley (eds.). Studies in Pacific Languages and Cultures. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand. 333–44.Find this resource:

—2002. Eccentric Agreement. In B. Fernández and P. Albizu (eds.). Kasu eta Komun-ztaduraren gainean [On Case and Agreement]. Euskal Herriko Unibetsitatea, Vitoria-Gasteiz. 15–48.Find this resource:

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 1992. The Syntactic Character of Thematic Structure. In I. M. Roca (ed.). Thematic Structure. Its Role in Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 107–44.Find this resource:

(p. 848) Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 1993. On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 53–109.Find this resource:

——2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hall, C. J. 1984. Integrating Diachronic and Processing Principles in Explaining the Suffx-ing Preference. In J. A. Hawkins (ed.). Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Blackwell. 321–49.Find this resource:

Halle, M. and A. Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20. Essays Presented to Silvain Bromberger on his 50th Birthday. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 111–76.Find this resource:

Halvorsen, P.-K. and R. M. Kaplan. 1988. Projections and Semantic Description in Lexical-Functional Grammar. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Gen-eration Computer Technology. 1116–1122. [Reprinted1995in M. Dalrymple et al. (eds.). Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.]Find this resource:

Han, J. 1999. On Grammatical Coding of Information Structure in Korean: A Role and Ref-erence Grammar Account. PhD dissertation, University at Buffalo. Available on RRG website: http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/research/rrg.html.Find this resource:

Hansson, G. Ó. 2007. Productive Syncretism in Saami Inflectional Morphology. In I. Toivo-nen and D. Nelson (eds.). Saami Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 91–135.Find this resource:

Harris, A. 1981. Georgian Syntax: A Study in Relational Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1984. Inversion as a Rule of Universal Grammar: Georgian Evidence. In D. M. Perlmutter and C. G. Rosen (eds.). Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 259–91.Find this resource:

—and L. Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hartsuiker, R. J. and C. Westenberg. 2000. Word Order Priming in Written and Spoken Sentence Production. In Cognition 75. B27–B39.Find this resource:

S. Bernolet, S. Schoonbaert, S. Speybroeck, and D. Vanderelst. 2008. Syntactic Priming Persists while the Lexical Boost Decays: Evidence from Written and Spoken Dialogue. In Journal of Memory and Language 58. 214–238.Find this resource:

H. Kolk, and W. J. Huinck. 1999. Agrammatic Production of Subject-Verb Agreement: The Effect of Conceptual Number. In Brain and Language 69. 119–60.Find this resource:

——and P. Huiskamp. 1999. Priming Word Order in Sentence Production. In Quar-terly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A. 129–47.Find this resource:

Harvey, M. 2001. A Grammar of Limilngan: A Language of the Mary River Region, Northern Territory, Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Hasada, R. 1997. Conditionals and Counterfactuals in Japanese. In Language Sciences 19. 277–88.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. 1993a. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—1993b. More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations. In B. Comrie and M. S. Polinsky (eds.). Causatives and Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87–120.Find this resource:

—1999a. External Possession in a European Areal Perspective. In D. L. Payne and I. Barshi (eds.). External Possession. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 109–35.Find this resource:

(p. 849) —1999b. Explaining Article-Possessor Complementarity: Economic Motivation in Noun Phrase Syntax. In Language 75. 227–43.Find this resource:

—2001. The European Linguistic Area: Standard Average European. In M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.). Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1492–1510.Find this resource:

—2002. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

—2003. The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-linguistic Comparison. In M. Tomasello (ed.). The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 211–43.Find this resource:

—2004. Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: A Usage Based Account. Constructions 2/2004(free on-line journal, University of Düsseldorf).Find this resource:

—2005a. Argument Marking in Ditransitive Alignment Types. In Linguistic Disovery 3. 1–21. http://linguistic-discovery.dartmouth.edu.Find this resource:

—2005b. Ditransitive Constructions: the Verb Give. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 426–9.Find this resource:

—2006. Against Markedness (and What to Replace it With). In Journal of Linguistics 41. 1–46.Find this resource:

—and S. Michaelis. (forthcoming). Leipzig fourmille de typologues – Genitive Objects in Comparison. In G. G. Corbett and M. Noonan (eds.). Case and Grammatical Relations: Papers in Honour of Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—and T. Müller-Bardey. 2004. Valency Change. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.). Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter. 1130–45.Find this resource:

M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie. 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hasselblatt, C. 1992. Grammatisches Wörterbuch des Estnischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Haude, K. 2006. A Grammar of Movima. PhD Thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Find this resource:

Hawkins, J. A. (ed.). 1984. Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—and A. Cutler. 1988. Psycholinguistic Factors in Morphological Asymmetry. In J. A. Hawkins (ed.). Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Blackwell. 280–317.Find this resource:

Hawkins, R. D. 2001. Second Language Syntax: a Generative Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Hawkins, R. E. 1998. Wai Wai. In D. C. Derbyshire and G. K. Pullum (eds.). Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 4. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 25–224.Find this resource:

Hayes, J. 1997. Sumerian. Lincom/Materials, 68. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Hayward, R. J. 1979. Bayso Revisited; Some Preliminary Linguistic Observations II. In Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (BSOAS) 42. 101–42.Find this resource:

—1984. The Arbore Language: A First Investigation. (Including a Vocabulary.) Cushitic Language Studies 2. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Find this resource:

—1988. Is There a Language with an Indefinite Nominative – Burji? In T. Beyene (ed.). Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Ethiopian Studies. University of AddisAbaba. 679–91.Find this resource:

—1990. Notes on Zayse Language. In R. J. Hayward (ed.). Omotic Language Studies. London: School of Oriental and African Studies. 210–355.Find this resource:

(p. 850) Hayward, R. J. and Y. Tsuge. 1998. Concerning Case in Omotic. In Afrika und Übersee, 81. 21–38.Find this resource:

Heath, J. 2005. A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Heeschen, C. 1980. Strategies of Decoding Actor-Object-Relations by Aphasic Patients. In Cortex 16. 5–19.Find this resource:

Heine, B. 1976. The Kuliak Languages of Eastern Uganda. Nairobi: East African Publishing House.Find this resource:

—1983. The Ik Language. Ms. Cologne: Universität zu Köln.Find this resource:

—1990. The Dative in Ik and Kanuri. In W. Croft, K. Denning, and S. Kemmer (eds.). Studies in Typology and Diachrony: Papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th birthday. Typological Studies in Language 20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 129–49.Find this resource:

—1997a. The Cognitive Foundations of Grammer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—1997b. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—1999. Ik-dictionary. Nilo-Saharan, 15. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

—2002. Ways of Explaining Possession. In I. Baron, M. Herslund, and F. Sørensen (eds.). Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 311–28.Find this resource:

—2003 Grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.). The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 575–601.Find this resource:

—and U. Claudi. 1986. On the Rise of Grammatical Categories. Some Examples from Maa. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Find this resource:

—and T. Kuteva. 2001. Attributive Possession in Creoles. In Pidgins and Creoles Archive 7.[http://www.pca.uni-siegen.de]Find this resource:

——2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Find this resource:

——2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

——2006. The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—and R. Vossen. 1975–6. Zur Stellung der Ongamo-Sprache (Kilimandscharo). In Afrika und Übersee 59. 81–105.Find this resource:

—U. Claudi, and F. Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

Helbig, G. and J. Buscha. 1996. Deutsche Grammatik. Ein Handbuch für Ausländer. 17th edition. Leipzig: Langenscheidt.Find this resource:

Hemforth, B. 1993. Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentation und Verarbeitung grammatischen Wissens. Sankt Augustin: Infix Verlag.Find this resource:

Hendriks, P. and H. de Hoop. 2001. Optimality Theoretic Semantics. In Linguistics and Philosophy 24. 1–32.Find this resource:

Henkelmann, P. 2006. Die Funktionen von Akkusativmarkern aus typologischer und di-achroner Sicht. Munich: M-Press Meidenbauer.Find this resource:

Hentschel, G. 1991. Rol' sxem formal'noj differenciacii v istoričeskom razvitii flektivnoj sistemy russkogo suščestvitel'nogo [The role of the schemes of formal differentiation in the historical development of the inflectional system of the Russian substantive]. In Russian Linguistics 15. 31–51.Find this resource:

(p. 851) Hermon, G. 2001. Non-canonically Marked A/S in Imbabura Quechua. In A. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon, and M. Onishi (eds.). Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 149–77.Find this resource:

Hetzron, R. 1970. Toward an Amharic Case-Grammar. In Studies in African Linguistics 1. 301–54.Find this resource:

—1995. Genitival Agreement in Awngi: Variation on an Afroasiatic Theme. In F. Plank (ed.). Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 325–35.Find this resource:

von Heusinger, K. and J. Kornfilt. 2005. The Case of the Direct Object in Turkish: Semantics, Syntax and Morphology. In Turkic Languages 9. 3–44.Find this resource:

Hewitt, B. G. 1979. Abkhaz. Lingua Descriptive Studies, vol. 2. North Holland: Amsterdam.Find this resource:

—1996. Georgian: A Learner's Grammar. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

—2005. North West Caucasian. In Lingua 115. 91–145.Find this resource:

Hewson, J. and V. Bubenik. 2006. From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamin.Find this resource:

Heycock, C. 1993. Syntactic Predication in Japanese. In Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2. 167–211.Find this resource:

Hildebrandt, K. A. 2004. A Grammar and Glossary of the Manange Language. In C. Genetti (ed.). Tibeto-Burman Languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa. Pacific Linguistics 557. Canberra: The Australian National University. 1–189.Find this resource:

Hinrichs, U. (ed.) 1999. Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Find this resource:

—2000. Prolegomena zu einer Theorie des Analytismus I, II. In U. Hinrichs and U. Büttner (eds.). Die Südosteuropa-Wissenschaften im neuen Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 83–128.Find this resource:

Hiraiwa, K. 2005. Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Hjelmslev, L. 1935. La catégorie des cas: Etude de grammaire générale I. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. [Acta Jutlandica: Aarsskrift for Aarhus Universitet 7.1.]Find this resource:

—1937. La catégorie des cas: Etude de grammaire générale II. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. [Acta Jutlandica: Aarsskrift for Aarhus Universitet 9.3.]Find this resource:

Hoberg, U. 1981. Die Wortstellung in der geschriebenen deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Munich: Hueber.Find this resource:

Hockett, C. F. 1954. Two Models of Grammatical Description. In Word 10. 210–31.Find this resource:

Hoddinott, W. G and F. M. Kofod. 1976. Ergative, Locative and Instrumental Case Inflections – Ngangikurungur. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.). Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Linguistic Series No.22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies/New Jersey: Humanities Press. 401–5.Find this resource:

HÖftmann, H. 1993. Grammatik des Fon. Leipzig: Langenscheidt Enzyklopädie.Find this resource:

Holisky, D. A. 1987. The Case of the Intransitive Subject in Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In Lingua 71. 103–32.Find this resource:

—1994. (with R. Gagua) Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In R. Smeets (ed.). Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus: North East Caucasian Languages. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books. 147–212.Find this resource:

Holm, S. 1979. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. In Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6. 65–70.Find this resource:

Holst, J. H. 2005. Einführung in die eskimo-aleutischen Sprachen. Hamburg: Buske.Find this resource:

Holton, D., P. Mackridge, and I. Philippaki-Warburton. 1997. Greek. A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

(p. 852) de Hoop, H. 1989. Case Assignment and Generalized Quantifiers. In Proceedings of NELS 19. 176–90.Find this resource:

—1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. PhD Dissertation, University of Groningen. (Published as de Hoop 1996.)Find this resource:

de Hoop, H. 1996. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

—1999. Optimal Case Assignment. In R. van Bezooijen and R. Kager (eds.). Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 97–109.Find this resource:

—2006. On (in)animate noun phrases. Unpublished ms. Radboud University Nijmegen.Find this resource:

—and M. J. A. Lamers. 2006. Incremental Distinguishability of Subject and Object. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, and P. de Swart (eds.). Case, Valency, and Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 269–87.Find this resource:

——2007. On Fluid Differential Case Marking: a Bidirectional OT Approach. In Lingua 117 (Special issue on Recent Developments in Optimality Theory; Vieri Samec-Lodovici, ed.). 1636–56.Find this resource:

—and A. L. Malchukov. 2008. Case Marking Strategies. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry 39(4).Find this resource:

—and B. Narasimhan. 2005. Differential Case-marking in Hindi. In M. Amberber and H. de Hoop (eds.). Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case. Oxford: Elsevier. 321–45.Find this resource:

——2008. Ergative Case-marking in Hindi. In H. de Hoop and P. de Swart (eds.). Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer. 63–78.Find this resource:

Hopf, J.-M., J. Bayer, M. Bader, and M. Meng. 1998. Event Related Brain Potentials and Case Information in Syntactic Ambiguities. In Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10. 264–80.Find this resource:

M. Bader, M. Meng, and J. Bayer. 2003. Is Human Sentence Parsing Serial or Parallel? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials. In Cognitive Brain Research 15. 165–77.Find this resource:

Hopper, P. J. and S. A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. In Language 56. 251–99.Find this resource:

——(eds.). 1982. Studies in Transitivity. Syntax and Semantics 15. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—and E. C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Horn, L. 1984. Towards a New Taxonomy of Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 11–42.Find this resource:

Hornstein, N. 2003. On Control. In R. Hendrick (ed.). Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell. 6–81.Find this resource:

Hosokawa, K. 1991. The Yawuru Language of West Kimberley: A Meaning-based Description. PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Hovdhaugen, E., I. HOËM, C. M. Iosefo, and A. M. Vonen. 1989. A Handbook of the Tokelau Language. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Find this resource:

Hualde, J. I. 2003. Case and Number Inflection of Noun Phrases. In J. I. Hualde and J. Ortiz de Urbina (eds.). A Grammar of Basque. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 171–86.Find this resource:

—and J. Ortiz de Urbina (eds.). 2003. A Grammar of Basque. Berlin: Mouton.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Huber, W., K. Poeck, D. Weniger, and K. Willmes. 1983. Der Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Find this resource:

(p. 853) Hudson, R. 1995. Does English Really Have Case? In Journal of Linguistics 31. 375–92.Find this resource:

Hume, A. 1612. Prima elementa grammaticae in usum iuventutis Scoticae. Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Ibragimov, G. Kh. 1978. Rutul'skij jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

—1990. Tsakhurskij jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Iggesen, O. A. 2005a. Asymmetrical Case Marking, in M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 206–9.Find this resource:

—2005b. Case-Asymmetry. A World-Wide Typological Study on Lexeme-Class-Dependent Deviations in Morphological Case Inventories. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—2005c. Number of Cases. In M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 202–5.Find this resource:

Ikegami, Y. 1981. Suru to naru no gengogaku [Linguistic studies on do-languages and become-languages]. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Find this resource:

Indefrey, P. and W. J. M. Levelt. 2004. The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components. In Cognition 92. 101–4.Find this resource:

Inoue, A. and J. D. Fodor. 1995. Information-Paced Parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka and N. Nagai (eds.). Japanese Sentence Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 9–63.Find this resource:

Inoue, K. 2006. Case (With Special Reference to Japanese). In M. Everaert and H. van Rijmsdijk (eds.). Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell. 295–374.Find this resource:

Insler, S. 1991–92. The Prakrit Ablative in-āhi. In Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 72–73. 15–21.Find this resource:

Iordanidi, S. I. and V. B. Krys'ko. 2000. Istoričeskaja grammatika drevnerusskogo jazyka. Tom 1. Množestvennoe čislo imennogo sklonenija. [A Historical Grammar of Old Russian. Vol. 1. Nominal declension: Plural]. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Find this resource:

Ivanov, V. V. 1983. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. [A Historical Grammar of Russian]. Moscow: Prosveščenie.Find this resource:

Ivić, P. 2001. Balkansprachbund und Sprachgeographie. In H. Schaller (ed.). Grundfragen eines Südosteuropa-Sprachatlas. Geschichte. Problematik. Method. Pilotprojekt. Marburg: Biblion Verlag. 45–52.Find this resource:

Iwasaki, S. 1987. Identifiability, Scope-Setting, and the Particle ‘wa’: A Study of Japanese Spoken Expository Discourse. In J. Hinds et al. (eds.). Perspectives on Topicalization-The Case of Japanese ‘wa’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 107–41.Find this resource:

—2002. Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—1976. Toward an Explanatory Semantic Representation. In Linguistic Inquiry 7(1). 89–150.Find this resource:

—1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—1987. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory. In Linguistic Inquiry 18. 369–411.Find this resource:

—1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—and B. Landau. 1992. Spatial Language and Spatial Cognition. In R. Jackendoff (ed.). Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 99–124.Find this resource:

Jacobsen, W. 1964. A Grammar of the Washo Language. PhD dissertation University of California at Berkeley.Find this resource:

—1992. The Transitive Structure of Events in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Find this resource:

(p. 854) Jaeger, F. T. and R. Levy. 2006. The Structural Basis of Probabilistic Syntactic Production. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Find this resource:

JÄger, G. 2004. Learning Constraint Sub-hierarchies. The Bidirectional Gradual Learning Algorithm. In R. Blutner and H. Zeevat (eds.). Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. 251–87.Find this resource:

—and H. Zeevat. 2002. A Statistical Reinterpretation of Harmonic Alignment. In Pro-ceedings of the 4th Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language and Linguistics. 173–81.Find this resource:

Jahani, C. 2003. The Case System in Iranian Balochi in a Contact Linguistic Perspective. In C. Jahani and A. Korn (eds.). The Baloch and Their Neighbours. Wiesbaden: Reichert. 113–32.Find this resource:

Jake, J. 1985. Grammatical Relations in Imbambura Quechua. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Jakobson, R. 1931. K xarakteristike èvrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza. In Selected Writings 1. The Hague: Mouton [1970]. 144–201.Find this resource:

—1936. Beiträge zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6. 240–88. [Reprinted in 1966 in E. P. Hamp, F. W. Householder, and R. Austerlitz (eds.). Readings in Linguistics II. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 51–89. Reprinted in 1971 in Selected Writings II. Den Haag: Mouton. 23–72. ]Find this resource:

—1958 [1971]. Morphological Inquiry into Slavic Declension: Structure of Russian Case Forms [text in Russian, summary in English in 1971 version]. In R. Jakobson. Selected writings, Vol. II: Words and Language. The Hague: Mouton. 154–83.Find this resource:

Janda, L. 1993. A Geography of Case Semantics: The Czech Dative and the Russian Instrumen-tal. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Janssen, D., B. Bickel, and F. Zúñiga. 2006. Randomization Tests in Language Typology. In Linguistic Typology 10. 419–40.Find this resource:

Jelaska, Z., M. Kovačević, and M. anĐel. 2002. Morphology and Semantics-The Basis of Croatian Case. In M. D. Voeikova, and W. U. Dressler (eds.). Pre-and Protomorphol-ogy: Early Phases of Morphological Development in Nouns and Verbs. München: Lincom. 177–89.Find this resource:

Jelinek, E. 1984. Empty Categories, Case and Configurationality. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2. 39–76.Find this resource:

Jensen, J. T. 1977. Yapese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Find this resource:

Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Find this resource:

Johanson, L. 2002. Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts. London: Curzon.Find this resource:

—2006. Two Approaches to Specificity. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, and P. de Swart (eds.). Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 123–35.Find this resource:

Johns, A., D. Massam, and J. Ndayiragije. 2006. Ergativity: Emerging Issues. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Johnson, K. 1991. Object Positions. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9. 577–636.Find this resource:

Jones, M. A. 1988. Cognate Objects and the Case Filter. In Journal of Linguistics 24. 89–110.Find this resource:

Jones, M. C. 2002. Mette a haout dauve la grippe des Angllaïs: Convergence on the Island of Guernsey. In M. C. Jones, and E. Esch (eds.). Language Change. The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 143–68.Find this resource:

Joshi, A. K. 1985. How Much Context-sensitivity is Required to Provide Reasonable Structural Descriptions: Tree Adjoining Grammars. In D. R. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, and A. Zwicky (eds.). Natural Language Parsing: Psycholinguistic, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 206–50.Find this resource:

(p. 855) ——L. Levy, and M. Takahashi. 1975. Tree Adjunct Grammars. In Journal of the Computer and System Sciences 10. 136–63.Find this resource:

Junker, M. -O. 2003. A Native American View of the ‘Mind’ as Seen in the Lexicon of Cognition in East Cree. In Cognitive Linguistics 14. 167–94.Find this resource:

—2008. Semantic Primes and their Grammar in a Polysynthetic Language: East Cree. In C. Goddard (ed.). Studies in Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 163–204.Find this resource:

—and Louise Blacksmith. 2006. Are There Emotional Universals? Evidence from the Native American language East Cree. In Culture & Psychology (12)3. 275–304.Find this resource:

Jurafsky, D. 2003. Probabilistic Modeling in Psycholinguistics: Linguistic Comprehension and Production. In R. Bod, J. Hay, and S. Jannedy (eds.). Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 39–95.Find this resource:

Kaan, E., F. Wijnen, and T. Y. Swaab. 2004. Gapping: Electrophysiological Evidence for Immediate Processing of ‘Missing’ Verbs in Sentence Comprehension. In Brain and Language 89. 584–92.Find this resource:

Kachru, Y. 1987. Ergativity, Subjecthood and Topicality in Hindi-Urdu. In Lingua 71. 223–38.Find this resource:

Kahr, J. C. 1975. Adpositions and Locationals: Typology and Diachronic Development. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 19. 21–54.Find this resource:

—1976. The Renewal of Case Morphology: Sources and Constraints. In Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford University)20. 107–51.Find this resource:

KÄmpfe, H. -R. and A. P. Volodin. 1995. Abriß der tschuktschischen Grammatik auf der Basis der Schriftsprache. Tunguso Sibirica,1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Karlsson, F. 1982. Suomen Peruskielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Find this resource:

—1983. Finnish: An Essential Grammar. Juva: WSOY.Find this resource:

—1999. Finnish. An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kastenholz, R. 1989. Grundkurs Bambara (Manding). Cologne: Köppe.Find this resource:

Keenan, E. L. 1974. The Functional Principle: Generalizing the Notion of ‘Subject of’. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 298–309.Find this resource:

—1989. Semantic Case Theory. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.). Semantics and Contextual Expression. Dordrecht: Foris. 33–56.Find this resource:

—and B. Comrie. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy and Universal Grammar. In Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–99.Find this resource:

Van Kemenade, A. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Find this resource:

Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Kempe, V. and B. MacWhinney. 1998. The Acquisition of Case Marking by Adult Learners of Russian and German. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, N 4. 543–87.Find this resource:

Kempen, G. 1977. Conceptualizing and Formulating in Sentence Production. In S. Rosenberg (ed.). Sentence Production: Developments in Research and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 259–75.Find this resource:

—and K. Harbusch. 2002. An Artificial Opposition between Grammaticality and Frequency: Comment on Bornkessel, Schlesewsky and Friederici (2002). In Cognition 90. 205–10.Find this resource:

—and E. Hoenkamp. 1987. An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation. In Cognitive Science 11. 201–58.Find this resource:

—and P. Huijbers. 1983. The Lexicalization Process in Sentence Production and Naming: Indirect Election of Words. In Cognition 14. 185–209.Find this resource:

(p. 856) Kenesei, I., R. M. Vago, and A. Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kerimova, A. A. and V. S. Rastorgueva. 1975. Kategorija padeža [The category of case]. In V. S. Rastorgueva (ed.). Opyt istoriko-tipologičeskogo issledovanija iranskix jazykov [A Diachronic-Typological Study of the Iranian Languages. ] Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka. 117–99.Find this resource:

Van De Kerke, S. 1996. Affix Order and Interpretation in Bolivian Quechua. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Kibrik, A. A. (forthcoming). What's in the Head of Head-Marking Languages or Is there Case in Head-Marking Languages? In B. Comrie and V. Solovyev (eds.). The Typology of Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Kibrik, A. E. 1970. K tipologii prostranstvennyx značenij (na materiale dagestanskix jazykov). In Jazyk i čelovek. Moscow: MGU.Find this resource:

—1979. Canonical Ergativity and Daghestan Languages. In F. Plank (ed.). Ergativity. London: Academic Press. 61–77.Find this resource:

—1985. Toward a Typology of Ergativity. In J. Nichols and A. Woodbury (eds.). Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 268–324.Find this resource:

—1991. Organizing Principles for Nominal Paradigms in Daghestanian Languages. In F. Plank (ed.). Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 225–74.Find this resource:

—1992. Principy organizacii imennoj paradigmy v dagestanskix jazykax (sopostavitel'no-tipologičeskie nabl'udenija). In A. E. Kibrik. Ošrki po občim i prikladnym voprosam jazykoznanija. Moscow: MGU. Chapter 8.Find this resource:

—and D. S. Sanedor. 1994a. Archi. In R. Smeets (eds.). The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 4. Delmar, New York: Caravan Books. 297–365.Find this resource:

——1994b. Khinalug. In R. Smeets (ed.). The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 4. Delmar, New York: Caravan Books. 368–407.Find this resource:

—1995. Direct-oblique agreement of attributes in Tsez and elsewhere in Daghestanian. In F. Plank (ed.). Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 216–39.Find this resource:

S. G. Tatevosov, and A. Eulenberg. (eds.). 1996. Godoberi. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—1997. Beyond Subject and Object: Towards a Comprehensive Relational Typology. In Linguistic Typology 1(3). 279–346.Find this resource:

—1998. Archi (Caucasian-Daghestanian). In A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds.). Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 455–76.Find this resource:

—and Ja. G. Testele. (eds.). 1999. Elementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii. Moscow: Nasledie.Find this resource:

K. I. Kazenin, E. A. Ljutikova, and S. G. Tatevosov. (ed.). 2001. Bagvalinskij jazyk. Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari. [The Bagval language. Grammar. Texts. Lexica. ]. Moscow: Nasledie.Find this resource:

—2003a. Nominal Inflection Galore: Daghestanian, with side glances at Europe and the World. In F. Plank (ed.). Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Mouton de Gruyter. 37–112.Find this resource:

—2003b. Konstanty i peremennye jazyka. Moscow: Aleteia.Find this resource:

—and S. Kodzasov. 1990. Sopostavitel'noe izučenie dagestanskix jazykov. Imja. Fonetika. Moscow: MGU.Find this resource:

——2004. Bezhta. In M. Job (ed.). Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 3. The North East Caucasian Languages. Ann Arbor.Find this resource:

(p. 857) ——S. V. Kodzasov, and I. P. Olovjannikova, 1972. Fragmenty grammatiki khinalugskogo jazyka. Moscow: MGU.Find this resource:

———1977. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka [Towards a structural description of Archi]. (In Russian). Vols. 1–4. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Find this resource:

——and I. A Muravjova. 2000. Jazyk i fol'klor aljutorcev. Moscow: Nasledie. [English translation, 2004.Find this resource:

K. I. Kazenin, E. A. Ljutikova, and S. G. Tatevosov (eds.). 2001. Bagvalinskij jazyk: gramatika, teksty, slovari. Moscow: Nasledie.Find this resource:

S. V. Kodzasov and I. A. Muravyova. 2004. Language and Folklore of the Alutor People. Suita, Japan: ELPR Publications.Find this resource:

Kiefer, F. 1987. The Cases of Hungarian Nouns. In Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, Vol. 37. 93–101.Find this resource:

Kiessling, R. 1994. Eine Grammatik des Burunge. Afrikanistische Forschungen 13. Hamburg: Research and Progress.Find this resource:

—2007. The Marked Nominative in Datooga. In Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 28. 149–91.Find this resource:

Kilani-Schoch, M., and Dressler, W. U. 2002. The Emergence of Inflectional Paradigms in Two French Corpora: An Illustration of General Problems of Pre-and Protomorphology. In: M. D. Voeikova and W. U. Dressler (eds.). Pre-and Protomorphology: Early Phases of Morphological Development in Nouns and Verbs. Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 29. Munich: Lincom. 45–61.Find this resource:

A. de Marco, A. Christofidou, M. Vassilakou, R. Vollmann, and W. U. Dressler. 1997. On the Demarcation of Phases in Early Morphology Acquisition in Four Languages. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.). Pre-and Protomorphology in Language Acquisition. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics V. 33. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University. 15–33.Find this resource:

Kilby, D. 1981. On Case Markers. In Lingua 54. 101–33.Find this resource:

Kim, S. and J. Maling. 1993. Syntactic Case and Frequency Adverbials in Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, V. 368–78.Find this resource:

——1998. Case Assignment in the siph-ta-construction. In R. King (ed.). Description and Explanation in Korean Linguistics. Cornell East Asian Series. Ithaca, NY: The Cornell University Press. 133–68.Find this resource:

Kim, Y. 1999. The Effects of Case Marking Information on Korean Sentence Processing. In Language and Cognitive Processes 14. 687–714.Find this resource:

Kimball, G. D. 1985. A Descriptive Grammar of Koasati. Dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans.Find this resource:

—1991. Koasati Grammar: Studies in the Anthropology of North American Indians. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Kimball, J. 1973. Seven Principles of Surface Structure Parsing in Natural Language. In Cognition 2. 15–47.Find this resource:

Kinsui, S. 1995. Katari no ‘wa’ ni kansuru oboegaki [Memoranda on ∼wa in Old Japanese speech]. In T. Masuoka et al. (eds.). Nihongo no shudai to toritate [Topic and topicalization in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kuroshio. 71–80.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in Phonology. In S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 93–106.Find this resource:

—1987. Morphology and Grammatical Relations. Unpublished ms., Stanford University.Find this resource:

(p. 858) Kiparsky, P. 1988. Agreement and Linking Theory. Unpublished MS., Stanford University.Find this resource:

—1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.). Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 460–94.Find this resource:

—1998. Partitive Case and Aspect. In M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds.). The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 259–307.Find this resource:

—2001. Structural Case in Finnish. In Lingua 111. 315–76.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, V. 1967. Russische historische Grammatik, Bd. 2: Die Entwicklung des Formensystems. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

Kiss, K. 2000. Effect of Verb Complexity on Agrammatic Aphasics' Sentence Production. In R. Bastiaanse and Y. Grodzinsky (eds.). Grammatical Disorders in Aphasia. London: Whurr Publishers. 123–51.Find this resource:

Kittilô, S. 2002. Transitivity: Towards a Comprehensive Typology. Publications in General Linguistics 5. Turku: Åbo Akademis Tryckeri.Find this resource:

—2005a. Differential Goal Marking: On the Encoding of Animate and Inanimate Goals. Unpublished paper, University of Turku.Find this resource:

—2005b. A Typology of Involuntary Agent Constructions. In Word 56. 3.Find this resource:

—2006a. Object-, Animacy-and Role-based Strategies. A Typology of Object Marking. In Studies in Language 30. 1–32.Find this resource:

—2006b. The Woman Showed the Baby to her Sister. On Resolving Animacy-driven Ambiguity in Ditransitives. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, and P. de Swart (eds.). Studies in Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 291–309.Find this resource:

Klaiman, M. H. 1980. Bengali Dative Subjects. In Lingua 51. 275–95.Find this resource:

—1987. Mechanisms of Ergativity in South Asia. In Lingua 71. 61–102.Find this resource:

Klampfer, S. and K. Korecky-Kröll. 2002. Nouns and Verbs at the Transition from Pre-to Protomorphology: A Longitudinal Case Study on Austrian German. In M. D. Voeikova, and W. U. Dressler (eds.). Pre-and Protomorphology: Early Phases of Morphological Development in Nouns and Verbs. Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 29. Munich: Lincom. 61–75.Find this resource:

Kleist, K. 1905. Über Leitungsaphasie. In Monatschrift für Neurologie und Psychiatrie 17. 503–32.Find this resource:

Klenin, E. 1980. Conditions on Object Marking: Stages in the History of the East Slavic Genitive-accusative. In E. Traugott, R. Labrum, and S. Shepherd (eds.). Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 253–7.Find this resource:

Klimov, G. A. 1962. Sklonenie v kartvel'skix jazykax v sravnitel'no-istoričeskom aspekte [De-clension in Kartvelian languages in a comparative-historical perspective]. Moscow: Izda-tel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Find this resource:

Van Klinken, C. L. 1999. A Grammar of the Fehan Dialect of Tetun. An Austronesian Language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Knoeferle, P. and M. W. Crocker. 2006. The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence from Eye Tracking. In Cognitive Science 30. 481–529.Find this resource:

Kobayashi, J. 1984. Nihongo no joshi ‘wa’, ‘ga’ to birumago no joshi ‘ha’, ‘ka’ no taishōkenkyū[A contrastive study on the particles ∼wa and ∼ga in Japanese and ∼ha and ∼ka in Burmese]. In: Nihongo kyāiku [Education of the Japanese language] 54. 89–98.Find this resource:

Koehn, E. and S. Koehn. 1986. Apalai. In D. Derbyshire and G. K. Pullum (eds.). Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 33–127.Find this resource:

Kolk, H. 1995. A Time-based Approach to Agrammatic Production. In Brain and Language 50. 282–303.Find this resource:

(p. 859) ——and A. D. Friederici. 1985. Strategy and Impairment in Sentence Understanding by Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasics. In Cortex 21. 47–67.Find this resource:

—and M. Van Grunsven. 1985. Agrammatism as a Variable Phenomenon. In Cognitive Neuropsychology 2. 347–84.Find this resource:

D. J. Chwilla, M. Van Herten, and P. J. W. Oor. 2003. Structure and Limited Capacity in Verbal Working Memory: A Study with Event-Related Potentials. In Brain and Language 85. 1–36.Find this resource:

Koneski B., B. Vidoeski, and O. Jašar-Nasteva. 1968. Distribution des balkanismes en macédonien. In Actes du Premier Congrès international des études balkaniques et sud-est européennes. Vol. 6. Linguistique. Sofia: Académie bulgar des sciences. 517–48.Find this resource:

Konieczny, L. 1996. Human Sentence Processing: A Semantics-Oriented Parsing Approach (IIG-Bericht Nr. 3/96). PhD dissertation, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg i. Br.Find this resource:

König, C. 2002. Kasus im Ik. Nilo-Saharanische Reihe 16. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

—2006. Marked Nominative in Africa. In Studies in Language 30. 655–732.Find this resource:

—2008a. Case in Africa. Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—2008b. The Marked-Nominative Languages of Eastern Africa. In B. Heine and D. Nurse. A Linguistic Geography of Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 251–71.Find this resource:

Konopka, A. and K. Bock. 2005. Helping Syntax out: How much do Words do? Paper presented at the 18th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Language Processing, Tucson, Arizona.Find this resource:

Konstanz Universals Archive. http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/proj/sprachbau.htmFind this resource:

Koopman, H. 2006. Agreement Configurations: In Defense of ‘Spec head’. In C. Boeckx (ed.). Agreement Systems. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 159–99.Find this resource:

—and D. Sportiche. 1991. The Position of Subjects. In Lingua 85. 211–58.Find this resource:

Koopman, W. 1990. Word Order in Old English. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Find this resource:

—1993. The Order of Dative and Accusative Objects in Old English and Scrambling. In Studia Anglica Posnaniensia xxv-xxvii. 109–21.Find this resource:

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

—2000. Romani Genitives in Cross-linguistic Perspective. In V. Elšík and Y. Matras (eds.). Grammatical Relations in Romani: The Noun Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 123–49.Find this resource:

—2003a. Possessive Noun Phrases in the Languages of Europe. In F. Plank (ed.). Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 621–722.Find this resource:

—2003b. Action Nominal Constructions in the Languages of Europe. In F. Plank (ed.). Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 723–59.Find this resource:

—2004. Maria's Ring of gold: Adnominal Possession and Non-anchoring Relations in European Languages. In J. Kim, Y. A. Lander, and B. H. Partee (eds.). Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications. 155–81.Find this resource:

Korn, A. (forthcoming). How Patient is a Definite Patient? Marking of Arguments in Balochi Ergative and Mixed Constructions. In S. Karimi et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the First International Conference in Aspects of Iranian Linguistics. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Find this resource:

Kornfilt, J. 2006. DOM and Two Types of DSM in Turkish. Ms., Syracuse University. Kortlandt, F. H. H. 1983. On Final Syllables in Slavic. In Journal of Indo-European Studies 11. 167–85.Find this resource:

—1984. Proto-Armenian Case Endings. In International Symposium on Armenian Linguistics: Reports [Meždunarodnyj simpozium po armjanskomu jazykoznaniju: (p. 860) Doklady], 97–106. Erevan: AN Arm. SSR. [Reprinted in F. H. H. Kortlandt. 2003. 45–51. ]Find this resource:

Kortlandt, F. H. H. 2003. Armeniaca: Comparative Notes. Ann Arbor: Caravan.Find this resource:

—2005. On the Accentuation of the Illative. In Baltu Filoloǵija 14. 67–9.Find this resource:

Koshal, S. 1979. Ladakhi Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Find this resource:

Kotz, S. A., S. Frisch, D. Y. Von Cramon, and A. D. Friederici. 2003. Syntactic Language Processing: ERP Lesion Data on the Role of the Basal Ganglia. In Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 9. 1053–60.Find this resource:

Kozinsky, I., V. P. Nedjalkov, and M. S. Polinskaja. 1988. Antipassive in Chukchee: Oblique Object, Object Incorporation, Zero Object. In M. Shibatani (ed.). Passive and Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 651–706.Find this resource:

Kozintseva, N. 1995. Modern Eastern Armenian. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Kracht, M. 2002. On the Semantics of Locatives. In Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 157–232.Find this resource:

—2003. Against the Feature Bundle Theory of Case. In E. Brandner and H. Zinsmeister (eds.). New Perspectives on Case Theory. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 165–90.Find this resource:

—2005. The Semantics of Locatives in the Uralic Languages. In J. Fernandez-Vest (ed.). Les langues ouraliennes aujourd'hui: approche linguistique et cognitive. Paris: HonoréChampion. 145–58.Find this resource:

Krejnovič, E. A. 1958. Jukagirskij jazyk [The Yukaghir language]. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

—1982. Issledovanija i materialy po jukagirskomu jazyku. [The Yukaghir language: studies and materials. ] Moscow/Leningrad: Nauka.Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 1989. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aktionsarten. Munich: Fink.Find this resource:

—1992. Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution. In I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.). Lexical Matters. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 29–53.Find this resource:

—2004. Semantic and Pragmatic Conditions for the Dative Alternation. In Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 4. 1–32.Find this resource:

Krishnamurti, B. 2003. The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kroch, A. and A. K. Joshi. 1985. The Linguistic Relevance of Tree Adjoining Grammar. Technical Report MS-CS-85–16, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Kroeger, P. R. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Kruspe, N. 1999. A Grammar of Semelai. PhD. University of Melbourne.Find this resource:

Kuipers, A. H. 1967. The Squamish Language. Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Find this resource:

Kulikov, L. 2006. Case Systems in a Diachronic Perspective: A Typological Sketch. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, and P. de Swart (eds.). Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 23–47.Find this resource:

—2007. Case Variation in Indo-European and Beyond: A Diachronic Typological Overview. In J. BarDdal and S. Chelliah (eds.). The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Kumaxov, M. 1971. Slovoizmenenie adygskix jazykov [Inflectional system of the Adyghe languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

—1989. Sravnitel'no-istoričeskaja grammatika adygskix (čerkesskix) jazykov [A comparative-historical grammar of the Adyghe (Circassian) languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

(p. 861) —K. Vamling, and Z. Kumakhova. 1996. Ergative Case in Circassian Languages. In Lund University/Department of Linguistics Working Papers 45. 93–111.Find this resource:

Kuno, S. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Küntay, A. and D. I. Slobin. 1996. Listening to a Turkish Mother: Some Puzzles for Acquisition. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, and J. Guo (eds.). Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 265–86.Find this resource:

——1999. The Acquisition of Turkish as a Native Language. A Research Review. In Turkic Languages 3. 151–88.Find this resource:

——2002. Putting Interaction back into Child Language: Examples from Turkish. In Psychology of Language and Communication 6. 5–14.Find this resource:

Kuroda, SH. 2005. Focusing on the Matter of Topic: A Study of ‘wa’ and ‘ga’ in Japanese. In Journal of East Asian Linguisitics 14–1. 1–58.Find this resource:

Kuryłowicz, J. 1949. Le problème du classement des cas. In Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 9. 20–43. [Reprinted in Esquisses linguistiques. Wrocław & Kraków. 131–50.]Find this resource:

Kutsch Lojenga, C. 1994. Ngiti: A Central Sudanic Language of Zaire. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Kutscher, S. 2001. Nomen und nominales Syntagma in Lasischen: eine deskriptive Analyse des Dialekts von Ardeşen. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Laalo, K. 2002. Acquisition of Case in Finnish: A Preliminary Overview. In M. D. Voeikova and W. U. Dressler (eds.). Pre- and Protomorphology: Early Phases of Morphological Development in Nouns and Verbs. Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 29. Munich: Lincom. 83–105.Find this resource:

Lafitte, P. 1962 [1978]. Grammaire Basque (Navarro-Labourdin Littéraire). Revised edition. Donostia: Elkar.Find this resource:

Laka, I. 1993. The Structure of Inflection: A Case Study in X° Syntax. In J. I. Hualde and J. Ortiz de Urbina (eds.). Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 21–70.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. 1977. Linguistic Gestalts. Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 236–87.Find this resource:

—1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

—and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lamers, M. J. A. 2001. Sentence Processing: Using Syntactic, Semantic, and Thematic Information. Grodil 33. University of Groningen, Groningen.Find this resource:

—and H. de Hoop. 2005. Animacy Information in Human Sentence Processing: An Incremental Optimization of Interpretation Approach. In H. Christiansen, P. R. Skadhauge, and J. Villadsen (eds.). Constraint Solving and Language Processing (CLSP 2004). Heidelberg: Springer. 158–71.Find this resource:

Lamiroy, B. and N. Delbecque. 1998. The Possessive Dative in Romance and Germanic Languages. In W. Van Langendonck, and W. Van Belle (eds.). The Dative, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 29–74.Find this resource:

Lancelot, C. and Arnauld, A. 1660. Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris.Find this resource:

Landau, I. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

(p. 862) Landau, I. 2002. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Ms., Ben Gruion University. Available at http://www.bgu.ac.il/~idan/Find this resource:

Lander, Y. A. 2004. Dealing with Relevant Possessors. In J. Kim, Y. A. Lander, and B. H. Partee (eds.). Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications. 309–36.Find this resource:

Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

—1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

—1993. Reference-point Constructions. In Cognitive Linguistics 4. 1–38.Find this resource:

—1995. Possession and Possessive Constructions. In J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury (eds.). Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 51–79.Find this resource:

Langdon, M. 1970. A Grammar of Diegueño. The Mesa Grande dialect. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

van Langendonck, W. 1998. The Dative in Latin and the Indirect Object in Dutch. In W. van Langendonck and W. van Belle (eds.). The Dative. Volume 2: Theoretical and Contrastive Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 211–59.Find this resource:

LaPolla, R. J. 1993. Arguments Against ‘Subject’ and ‘Direct Object’ as Viable Concepts in Chinese. In Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63.4. 759–813.Find this resource:

Larson, R. K. 1988. On the Double Object Construction. In Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335–91.Find this resource:

Lasnik, H. and M. Saito. 1984. On the Nature of Proper Government. In Linguistic Inquiry 15. 235–89.Find this resource:

——1992. Move-α. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Last, M. and D. Lucassen. 1998. A Grammatical Sketch of Chai, a Southeastern Surmic Language. In G. J. Dimmendaal and M. Last (eds.). Surmic Languages and Cultures. Nilo-Saharan 13. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe. 375–436.Find this resource:

Laubscher, G. G. 1921. The Syntactical Causes of Case Reduction in Old French. Elliot Monographs 7. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Laughlin, C. 1975. Lexicostatistics and the Mystery of So Ethnolinguistic Relations. In Anthropological Linguistics 17. 325–41.Find this resource:

Laughren, M. 1992. Secondary Predication as a Diagnostic of Underlying Structure in Pama-Nyungan Languages. In I. Roca (ed.). Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar. Bedim Foris/Walter de Gruyter. 199–246.Find this resource:

Lazard, G. 1992. A Grammar of Contemporary Persian. Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishers.Find this resource:

—1998. Actancy. Berlin: Mouton.Find this resource:

—2003. Transitivity Revisited as an Example of a More Strict Approach to Typological research. In Folia Linguistica XXXVI 3–4. 141–90.Find this resource:

Lee, H. 2001a. Markedness and Word Order Freezing. In P. Sells (ed.). Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 63–128.Find this resource:

—2001b. Optimization in Argument Expression and Interpretation: A Unified Approach. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Find this resource:

—2003. Parallel Optimization in Case Systems. In M. Butt and T. H. King (eds.). Nominals: Inside and Out. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 15–58.Find this resource:

—2008. Quantitative Variation in Korean Case Ellipsis: Implications for Case Theory. In H. de Hoop and P. de Swart (eds.). Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer. 41–61.Find this resource:

(p. 863) Lee, S.-H. 1990. Konfrontative Analyse zwischen dem ungarischen und koreanischen Kasussystem. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Lefebvre, C. and A. Brousseau. 2002. A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Legate, J. A. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. In Linguistic Inquiry 39. 55–101.Find this resource:

Legendre, G., W. Raymond, and P. Smolensky. 1993. An Optimality-Theoretic Typology of Case and Grammatical Voice Systems. In Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley. 464–78.Find this resource:

Lehiste, I. 1997. Search for Phonetic Correlates in Estonian Prosody. In I. Lehiste and J. Ross (eds.). Estonian Prosody: Papers from a Symposium. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language. 11–35.Find this resource:

Lehmann, C. 1982. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. A Programmatic Sketch, Volume 1. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts, 48. Cologne: University of Cologne, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Find this resource:

—1985. Latin Case Relations in Typological Perspective. In C. Touratier (ed.). Syntaxe et latin. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence. 81–104.Find this resource:

—1988. On the Function of Agreement. In M. Barlow and A. Ferguson (eds.). Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 55–65.Find this resource:

—1991. Predicate Classes and PARTICIPATION. In H. Seiler and W. Premper (eds.). Partizipation: das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten. Tübingen: Narr. 183–239.Find this resource:

—1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 01. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—and Y.-M. Shin. 2005. The Functional Domain of Concomitance. A Typological Study of Instrumental and Comitative Relations. In Studia Typologica 7. 9–104.Find this resource:

Lehrman, A. 2006. Meaning as Grammar. In Language Sciences 28. 497–507.Find this resource:

Leibniz, G. W. 1903. Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Louis Coutrat (ed). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Reprinted 1961. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.]Find this resource:

Lenerz, J. 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: G. Narr Verlag.Find this resource:

—1984. Syntaktischer Wandel und Grammatiktheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Leslau, W. 1995. Reference Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Leumann, M., J. B. Hofmann, and A. Szantyr. 1977. Lateinische Grammatik. Bd. 1: Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Munich: Beck.Find this resource:

Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Find this resource:

—A. Roelofs, and A. S. Meyer. 1999. A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production. In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 1–38.Find this resource:

Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

——2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Levin, J. and D. Massam. 1984. Surface Ergativity: Case/Theta-relations Reexamined. In S. Berman (ed.). Proceedings of NELS 15. 286–301.Find this resource:

Levine, R. 1977. The Skidegate Dialect of Haida. PhD dissertation. Columbia University.Find this resource:

Levinson, S. C, S. Meira, and the Language and Cognition Group. 2003. ‘Natural Concepts’ in the Spatial Topological Domain-Adpositional Meanings in Cross-linguistic Perspective: An Exercise in Semantic Typology. In Language 79. 45–516.Find this resource:

(p. 864) Levy, P. 1990. Totonaco de Papantla, Veracruz. Mexico: Colegio de México.Find this resource:

Lewis, G. L. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Leyew, Z. 2003. The Kemantney Language. A Sociolinguistic and Grammatical Study of Language Replacement. Cushitic Language Studies 20. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Li, C. and S. A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language. In Li, C. (ed.). Subject and Topic. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press. 457–98.Find this resource:

——1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

——and J. O. Sawyer. 1977. Subject and Word Order in Wappo. In International Journal of American Linguistics 43. 85–100.Find this resource:

Li, P. J. K. and S. Tsuchida. 2001. Pazih Dictionary. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (Prepara tory Office), Academia Sinica.Find this resource:

Li, Y. H. A. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Lichtenberk, F. 1983. Relational Classifiers. In Lingua 60. 147–76.Find this resource:

Lindenfeld, J. 1973. Yaqui Syntax. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Lindsley, J. R. 1975. Producing Simple Utterances: How Far Ahead do we Plan? In Cognitive Psychology 7. 1–19.Find this resource:

—1976. Producing Simple Utterances: Details of the Planning Process. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5. 331–51.Find this resource:

Lindström, E. 2002. Topics in the Grammar of Kuot, a Non Austronesian Language of New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. PhD thesis, Stockholm University.Find this resource:

Linebarger, M. C., M. F. Schwartz, and E. M. Saffran. 1983. Sensitivity to Grammatical Structure in So Called Agrammatic Aphasics. In Cognition 13. 361–92.Find this resource:

Lomtadze, E. A. 1963. Ginukhskij dialekt didojskogo jazyka. Tbilisi.Find this resource:

Loogman, A. 1965. Swahili Grammar and Syntax. Louvain: Nauwelaerts.Find this resource:

Lord, C. 1982. The Development of Object Markers in Serial Verb Languages. In S. A. Thompson and P. J. Hopper (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 15. New York: Academic Press. 277–99.Find this resource:

Louwerse, J. 1988. The Morphosyntax of Una in Relation to Discourse Structure. Pacific Linguistics, Series B, No. 100. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Lukatela, K., S. Crain, and D. Shankweiler. 1988. Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphology in Agrammatism: Investigation of a Highly Inflected Language. In Brain and Language 33. 1–15.Find this resource:

Luraghi, S. 1986. On the Distribution of Instrumental and Agent Markers for Human and Non human Agents of Passive Verbs in Some Indo European Languages. In Indogermanische Forschungen 91. 48–66.Find this resource:

—1987. Patterns of Case Syncretism in Indo European Languages. In A. G. Ramat, O. Carruba, and G. Bernini (eds.). Papers from the VIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 355–71.Find this resource:

—2000. Synkretismus. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and H. Mugdan (eds.). Handbuch der Morphologie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 638–47.Find this resource:

—2001. Some Remarks on Instrument, Comitative, and Agent in Indo European. In Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54. 385–401.Find this resource:

—2003. On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. A Study of the Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 865) —2004a. The Container Schema in Homeric Greek. In A. Soares de Silva, A. Torres, and M. Gonçalves (eds.). Linguagem, cultura e cognição: Estudos de Linguística Cognitiva. Braga: Almedina. 25–41.Find this resource:

—2004b. The Evolution of the Greek Nominal Paradigm from Mycenean to Modern Greek. In Classica et Mediaevalia Vol. 55. 361–81.Find this resource:

—2005. The History of the Greek Preposition metá: From Polysemy to the Creation of Homonyms. In Glotta. 81. 130–59.Find this resource:

Luria, A. 1976. Basic Problems of Neurolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Luutonen, J. 1997. The Variation of Morpheme Order in Mari Declension. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Find this resource:

Lyons, C. 1986. The Syntax of English Genitive Constructions. In Journal of Linguistics 22. 123–43.Find this resource:

Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lytkin, V. I., K. E. Majtinskaja, and K. Redei (eds.). 1976. Osnovy finno-ugorskogo jazykoznanija. Marijskij, permskie i ugorskie jazyki. [The Fundamentals of Finno-Ugric Linguistics. The Mari, Permian and Ugric Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

MacDonald, L. 1990. A Grammar of Tauya. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

MacKenzie, D. N. 1961. Kurdish Dialect Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—1966. The Dialect of Awroman (Hawrāmān-ī Luhōn). Grammatical Sketch, Texts, and Vocabulary. Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab., Hist. Filos. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk. Vol. 4, 3. Copenhagen.Find this resource:

Mackinnon, R. 1971. Teach Yourself Gaelic. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Find this resource:

MacWhinney, B. and J. Osmán-Sági. 1991. Inflectional Marking in Hungarian Aphasics. In Brain and Language 41. 165–83.Find this resource:

Maddieson, I. (forthcoming). Areal and Typological Patterns in the Phonology of the Languages of Oceania. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2006).Find this resource:

Maffei, A. F. J. 1986. A Konkani Grammar. New Delhi: Asian Education Studies.Find this resource:

Magomedbekova, Z. M. 1967. Akhvakhskij jazyk. Tbilisi.Find this resource:

—1971. Karatinskij jazyk. Tbilisi.Find this resource:

Magomedova, P. T. 1979. Osnovnye voprosy sklonenija v andijskix jazykax v sravnitel'nom aspekte. In U. A. Mejlanova (ed.). Imennoe sklonenie v dagestanskix jazykax. Maxačkala: IIJaL. 41–69.Find this resource:

Magometov, A. A. 1963. Kubachinskij jazyk (issledovanie i teksty). Tbilisi.Find this resource:

—1965. Tabasaranskij jazyk. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Find this resource:

—1970. Agul'skij jazyk. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Find this resource:

—1982. Megebskij dialect darginskogo jazyka (issledovanie i teksty). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Find this resource:

Mahajan, A. 1989. Agreement and Agreement Phrases. In Functional Heads and Clause Structure. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 217–52.Find this resource:

Maizel, S. S. 1957. Izafet v tureckom jazyke. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR.Find this resource:

Makhmudova, S. M. 2001. Morfologija rutul'skogo jazyka [The Morphology of the Rutul Language]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.Find this resource:

Malchukov, A. L. 1995. Even. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—2000. Dependency Reversal in Noun-Attribute Constructions: Towards a Typology. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

—2004. Nominalization/verbalization: Constraining the Typology of Transcategorial Operations. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

(p. 866) Malchukov, A. L. 2005. Case Pattern Splits, Verb Types and Construction Competition. In M. Amberber, and H. de Hoop (eds.). Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: the Case for Case. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sciences. 73–119.Find this resource:

—2006a. Transitivity Parameters and Transitivity Alternations: Constraining Co-variation. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, and P. de Swart (eds.). Case, Valency and Tran-sitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 329–58.Find this resource:

—2006b. Yakut Interference in North-Tungusic Languages. In H. Boeschoten and L. Johanson (eds.). Turkic Languages in Contact. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 122–38.Find this resource:

—2007. ‘Quirky’ case: Rare Phenomena in Case-marking and their Theoretical Implications. Ms. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig.Find this resource:

—2008a. Split Intransitives, Experiencer Objects and ‘Transimpersonal’ Constructions: (Re-)establishing the Connection. In M. Donohue and S. Wichmann (eds.). The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 76–100.Find this resource:

—2008b. Animacy and Asymmetries in Differential Case Marking. In Lingua 118 (Special Issue on Animacy. M. J. A. Lamers and P. de Swart eds.). 203–21.Find this resource:

Malécot, A. 1963. Luiseño, a Structural Analysis II: Morphosyntax. In International Journal of American Linguistics 29. 196–210.Find this resource:

Maling, J. 1989. Adverbials and Structural Case in Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. 297–308.Find this resource:

—1990. Objects, Adverbs and Grammatical Case in Finnish. In H. Á. Sigurðsson (ed.). Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Reykjavík: Linguistic Institute, University of Iceland. 267–78.Find this resource:

—1993. Of Nominative and Accusative: The Hierarchical Assignment of Grammatical Case in Finnish. In A. Holmberg, and U. Nikanne (eds.). Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax. Studies in Generative Grammar 39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 51–76.Find this resource:

—2001. Dative: The Heterogeneity of the Mapping among Morphological Case, Grammatical Functions, and Thematic Roles. In Lingua 111. 419–64.Find this resource:

—2002. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi [It is raining dative in Iceland]: Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic. In Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 24. 31–105. [Also published in a slightly different English version in Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 70. 1–60. 2002.]Find this resource:

—and S. Kim. 1992. Case assignment in the Inalienable Possession Construction in Korean. In Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1. 37–68.Find this resource:

—J. Jun, and S. Kim. 2001. Case-marking on Duration Adverbials Revisited. In H. Ahn and S. Kim (eds.). Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Conference on Korean Linguistics. Seoul: Kjungjin Publishing Co. 323–35.Find this resource:

Mallinson, G., and B. J. Blake. 1981. Language Typology: Cross-linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Manandise, E. 1988. Evidence from Basque for a New Theory of Grammar. New York/London: Garland Publishing, Inc.Find this resource:

Manaster-Ramer, A. 1994. The Origin of the Term ‘ergative’. In Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 47. 211–14.Find this resource:

Maniacky, J. 2002. Tonologie du Ngangela. Variété de Menongue. PhD dissertation. Angola: L'Inalco University.Find this resource:

Manning, C. D. 1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

(p. 867) Marantz, A. 1981. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

—1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—1991. Case and Licensing. In G. Westphal, B. Ao, and H.-R. Chae (eds.). Proceedings of ESCOL '91. Cornell Linguistics Club. 234–53.Find this resource:

—1997. No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis and L. Siegel (eds.). Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Pennsylvania. 201–25.Find this resource:

Maratsos, M. P. and M. A. Chalkley. 1980. The Internal Language of Children's Syntax: The Ontogenesis and Representation of Syntactic Categories. In K. E. Nelson (ed.). Children's Language. Vol. 2. New York: Gardner. 127–214.Find this resource:

Marcus, G. F. 1993. Negative Evidence in Language Acquisition? In Cognition 46. 53–85.Find this resource:

Marmo, C. 1994. Semiotica e linguaggio nella scolastica: Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt: 1270–1330: la semiotica dei Modisti. Rome: Istituto Storico Italiano per Il Medio Evo.Find this resource:

Martin, R. A. 1996. A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control. PhD Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Find this resource:

—2001. Null Case and the Distribution of PRO. In Linguistic Inquiry 32. 141–66.Find this resource:

Marušič, F. and R. Žaucer. 2006. On the Intensional FEEL-LIKE Construction in Slovenian: A Case for a Phonologically Null Verb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory Vol. 24:4, 1093–159.Find this resource:

Marx, E. 1999. Gender Processing in Speech Production: Evidence from German Speech Errors. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28. 601–21.Find this resource:

Masica, C. P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Maslova, E. 1997. Yukagir Focus System in a Typological Perspective. In Journal of Pragmatics 27. 457–75.Find this resource:

—(ed.). 2001. Yukaghir Texts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Find this resource:

—2003. A Grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—2005. Information Structure in Tundra Yukaghir and Typology of Focus Structures. In J. Fernandez-Vest (ed.). Les langues ouraliennes aujourd'hui: Approche linguistique et cognitive. Paris: Honoré Champion. 599–610.Find this resource:

—2006. Information Focus in Relational Clause Structure. In T. Tsunoda and T. Kageyama (eds.). Voice and Grammatical Relations: In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 175–94.Find this resource:

Mateo-Toledo, B., V. Rodríguez, and J. Mendoza. (in press). La predicación secundaria en awakateko (maya). In R. Zavala and J. Aissen (eds.). Estudios sobre Predicación Secun-daria en Lenguas Mesoamericanas. Mexico, D.F.: CIESAS.Find this resource:

Mathiassen, T. 1996. A Short Grammar of Lithuanian. Columbus: Slavica.Find this resource:

Matisoff, J. A. 1986. Hearts and Minds in Southeast Asian Languages and English: An Essay in the Comparative Lexical Semantics of Psycho-collocations. In Cahiers de linguistique asie-orientale 15. 5–57.Find this resource:

Matras, Y. 1997. The Typology of Case Relations and Case Layer Distribution in Romani. In Y. Matras, P. Bakker, and H. Kyuchukov (eds.). The Typology and Dialectology of Romani. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 61–93.Find this resource:

Matthews, P. H. 1972. Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 868) Matthews, P. H. 1991. Morphology: an Introduction to the Theory of Word-structure, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Maynard. S. K. 1980. Discourse Functions of the Japanese Theme Marker ‘wa’. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Find this resource:

Mazuka, R. and N. Nagai (eds.). 1995. Japanese Sentence Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

McCawley, N. 1976. From OE/ME ‘Impersonal’ to ‘Personal’ Constructions: What is a ‘Subject-Less’ S?. In Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 192–204.Find this resource:

McFarland, C. 1978. Definite Object and Subject Selection in Philippine Languages. Studies in Philippine Linguistics 2. 139–82.Find this resource:

McGregor, W. 1998. Optional Case-Marking in Gooniyandi Revisited: Implications to a Theory of Marking. In Leuvense Bijdragen 87. 491–534.Find this resource:

—2008. Indexicals as Sources of Case-markers in Australian languages. In F. Josephson, and I. Söhrman (eds.), Interdependence of Diachronic and Synchronic Analyses (Studies in Language Companion Series 103). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 229–321.Find this resource:

McGuckin, C. 2002. Gapapaiwa. In J. Lynch, M. Ross, and T. Crowley (eds.). The Oceanic Languages. Richmond (Surrey): Curzon Press. 297–320.Find this resource:

McLendon, S. 1975. A Grammar of Eastern Pomo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

—1978. Ergativity, Case and Transitivity in Eastern Pomo. In International Journal of American Lingusitics 44. 1–9.Find this resource:

Meier, H. 1967. Deutsche Sprachstatistik. Vols. 1 and 2. Hildesheim: Olms.Find this resource:

Meiklejohn, J. M. D. 1892. A New Grammar of the English Tongue, 9th edn. London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co.Find this resource:

Meillet, A. 1936. Esquisse d'une grammaire comparée de l'arménien classique, 2nd edn. Vienna: Imprimerie des Frères Mekhitaristes.Find this resource:

—1949. Caractères generaux des langues germaniques. Paris: Hachette.Find this resource:

—1950. Les dialects indo-européens. Paris: Champion.Find this resource:

Meira, S. 1999. A Grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Find this resource:

MEL'cukč, I. A. 1986. Toward a Definition of Case. In R. D. Brecht and J. S. Levine (eds.). Case in Slavic. Columbus, OH: Slavica. 35–85.Find this resource:

—1988. Is there an Ergative Construction in Lezgian? In I. A. Mel'cukč. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press. 207–49.Find this resource:

—1998. Kurs obščcej morfologii, vol.2. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury.Find this resource:

Melinger, A. and A. Cleland. 2005. Noun Phrase Structure Priming within a Sentence: The Role of Grammatical Function and Linear Order. Paper presented at the 18th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Language Processing, Tucson, Arizona.Find this resource:

——(in preparation). Noun Phrase Structural Priming at the Beginnings and Ends of Sentences.Find this resource:

—and C. Dobel. 2005. Lexically-Driven Syntactic Priming. In Cognition 98. B11–B20.Find this resource:

Meng, M. and M. Bader. 2000. Ungrammaticality Detection and Garden-Path Strength: Evidence for Serial Parsing. In Language and Cognitive Processes 15. 615–66.Find this resource:

Menn, L. and B. MacWhinney. 1984. The Repeated Morph Constraint: Toward an Explanation. In Language 60. 519–41.Find this resource:

—and L. K. Obler. 1990. Agrammatic Aphasia: a Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 869) —M. O'Connor, L. K. Obler, and A. Holland. 1995. Non-Fluent Aphasia in a Multilingual World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Mennecier, P. 1995. Le tunumiisut, dialecte inuit du Groenland oriental: description et analyse. Paris: Klincksieck.Find this resource:

Menovshchikov, G. A. and N. B. Vakhtin. 1990. Eskimosskij jazyk [The Eskimo Language]. Leningrad: Prosveščenie.Find this resource:

Merdanova, S. R. 2004. Morfologija i grammatičeskaja semantika agul'skogo jazyka. Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija RAN.Find this resource:

Merlan, F. 1982. Mangarayi. Lingua Descriptive Series 4. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Find this resource:

—1985. Split Intransitivity: Functional Oppositions in Intransitive Inflections. In J. Nichols and A. C. Woodbury (eds.). Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause: Some Approaches to Theory from the Field. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 324–62.Find this resource:

—1989. Mangarayi. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Michaelis, S. and M. Rosalie. 2000. Polysémie et cartes sémantiques: le relateur (av)ek en créole seychellois. Études Créoles XXIII/2. 79–100.Find this resource:

Miller, A. 2001. A Grammar of Jamul Tiipay. Mouton Grammar Library 23. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Miller, B. V. 1953. Talyšskij jazyk. Moscow: Akademija Nauk.Find this resource:

Miller, M. 1999. Desano Grammar. Studies in the Languages of Colombia. The University of Texas at Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Mills, A. E. 1985. The Acquisition of German. In D. I. Slobin (ed.). The Cross-linguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol.1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 141–254.Find this resource:

Miloradović, S. 2003. Upotreba padežnih oblika u govoru Paraćog Pomoravlja. Balkanistički i etnomigracioni aspekt. Belgrade: Etnografski institut.Find this resource:

—and M. Greenberg. 2001. The Transition from South Slavic to Balkan Slavic: Key Morphological Features in Serbian Transitional Dialects. In V. A. Friedman, and D. L. Dyer (eds.). Of All the Slavs my Favorites. In Honor of Howard I. Aronson. Indiana Slavic Studies, Vol. 12. Bloomington, IN: Slavica. 311–22.Find this resource:

Mišeska-Tomić, O. (ed.). 2004. Balkan Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Mitchell, D. C. 1994. Sentence Parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.). Handbook of Psycholin guistics. San Diego: Academic Press. 375–409.Find this resource:

Mithun, M. 1984. The Evolution of Noun Incorporation. In Language 60. 847–94.Find this resource:

—1985. Disagreement: The Case of Pronominal Affixes and Nouns. In D. Tannen and J. E. Alatis (eds.). Georgetown Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1985: Languages and Linguistics: The Interdependence of Theory, Data and Application. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 50–66.Find this resource:

—1991. Active/Agentive Case Marking and its Motivations. In Language 67. 510–46.Find this resource:

—1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—2008. The Emergence of Agent/Patient Systems. In M. Donohue and S. Wichmann (eds.). The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 297–333.Find this resource:

Mladenov, M. and K. Steinke. 1978. Die Ergebnisse der neueren bulgarischen Dialektforschung im Lichte der Balkanologie. In Zeitschrift für Balkanologie. Vol. XIV. Wiesbaden. 68–82.Find this resource:

Mohanan, T. 1994. Argument Structure in Hindi. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

(p. 870) Moignet, G. 1976. Grammaire de l'ancien français. Morphologie-Syntaxe. 2nd edn. rev. and corr. Paris: Klincksieck.Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1973. The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.). Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel. 221–42.Find this resource:

Moravcsik, E. A. 1974. Object-Verb Agreement. In Working Papers in Language Universals 15. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 25–40.Find this resource:

—1978. On the Case Marking of Objects. In J. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Human Language. Vol.4. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 249–89.Find this resource:

—1995. Summing up Suffixaufnahme. In F. Plank (ed.). Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: OUP. 451–84.Find this resource:

—2003. Inflectional Morphology in the Hungarian Noun Phrase, in F. Plank (ed.). Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 397–466.Find this resource:

Morgenstierne, G. 1949. The Language of the Prasun Kafirs. In Norsk Tidsskrift for sprogv-idenskap 15. 188–334.Find this resource:

Morikawa, H. 1989. Acquisition of Case Marking and Predicate-Argument Structures in Japanese: A Longitudinal Study of Language Acquisition Mechanisms. PhD dissertation. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.Find this resource:

Morimoto, Y. 2008. From Topic to Subject Markers: Implications for a Typology of Subject Marking. In H. de Hoop and P. de Swart (eds.). Differential Subject Marking. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 199–223.Find this resource:

—and P. de Swart. 2006. Language Variation and Historical Change: The Spread of DOM in Spanish. In J. Doetjes and P. González (eds.). Selected Papers from Going Romance 2004. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 225–45.Find this resource:

Morin, Y.-C. and E. Tiffou. 1988. Passives in Burushaski. In M. Shibatani (ed.). 1988. Passive and Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 493–524.Find this resource:

Morse-Gagne, E. E. 2003. Viking Pronouns in England: Charting the course of THEY, THEIR, and THEM. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Mosel, U. 1987. Subject in Samoan. In D. C. Laycock, and W. Winter (eds.). A World of Language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 455–79.Find this resource:

—and E. Hovdhaugen. 1992. Samoan Reference Grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Find this resource:

Moshinsky, J. 1974. A Grammar of South Eastern Pomo. Berkeley: University of California Publications in Linguistics.Find this resource:

Mous, M. 1993. A Grammar of Iraqw. Hamburg: Buske.Find this resource:

Mullen, D. S. 1986. Issues in the Morphology and Phonology of Amharic: The Lexical Generation of Pronominal Clitics. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.Find this resource:

MÜller, G., L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.). 2004. Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Muravyova, I. A. 1998. Chukchee (Paleo-Siberian). In A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds.). Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 521–38.Find this resource:

Murkelinskij, G. B. 1971. Grammatika lakskogo jazyka. Maxačkala.Find this resource:

Mutalov, R. O. 2002. Glagol darginskogo jazyka. Maxačkala.Find this resource:

Næss, Å. 2004a. Transitivity: From Semantics to Structure. PhD dissertation. University of Nijmegen.Find this resource:

(p. 871) —2004b. What Markedness Marks: The Markedness Problem with Direct Objects. In Lingua 114. 1186–1212.Find this resource:

—2006. Case Semantics and the Agent-Patient Opposition. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, and P. de Swart (eds.). Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 309–28.Find this resource:

Nagano, Y. 1984. A Historical Study of the Gyarong Verb System. Tokyo: Seishido.Find this resource:

Nagaraja, K. 1985. Khasi: A Descriptive Analysis. Pune: Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute.Find this resource:

—1999. Korku Language: Grammar, Texts, and Vocabulary. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Find this resource:

Nakamura, W. 1999. Functional Optimality Theory: Evidence from Split Case Systems. In M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley (eds.). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Vol.2. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 253–77.