Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 January 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Throughout the 1970s and the 1980s, scholarly theories of ritual began incorporating the language of ‘action’, ‘performance’, and ‘practice’, partly as a corrective to perceived limitations to existing theory, which was dominated by structuralism and communicative models. Ritual, once conceived as staid and habitual—in the best case, expressive, communicative, and symbolic of already existing ideas, beliefs, and values—was approached freshly in terms of agency and efficacy. In early theory, ritual was said to function as a kind of social glue, binding individuals in groups and confirming social statuses and hierarchies. Performance and action-centred theories variously analyse the socially disruptive and transformative potentials of ritual, questions of aesthetics and embodiment, and the formal, invariant properties of ritual. ‘Action’ is a particularly difficult concept, as it is conceived and used in ritual theory in several different, sometimes antithetical ways.

Keywords: action, agency, inscription, performance, practice, relationship, ritual theory, virtuality

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.