Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).

date: 25 May 2017

Abstract and Keywords

The chapter reconstructs the main arguments of Richard Tuck’s Natural Rights Theories in order to examine Tuck’s claim that a philosophical problem can be “solved historically” by investigating what role a concept, such as natural rights, might have played in various systems of thought. I focus especially on Tuck’s thesis that natural rights originated in the notion of dominium in medieval jurisprudence and theology, contesting the view that natural rights were a specifically modern liberal phenomenon. I also consider Tuck’s treatment of Gerson, Grotius, Selden, Hobbes, and Locke to highlight what he regards as the ambiguous “Janus-faced” character of natural rights, represented in two separate legacies—the “conservative” theory and the “radical” theory of rights. In recovering these diverse languages of rights, Tuck underlines their historically contingent character, while also forcing us to alienate ourselves from something that is all too often taken to be immediately familiar.

Keywords: Richard Tuck, natural rights, dominium, Jean Gerson, Hugo Grotius, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.