Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 13 November 2018

Abstract and Keywords

This article explores the debate over evolutionary morality. While much evidence supports the scientific validity of evolution, it could not resolve was the origin of ethical behavior, thus hindering its popular acceptance as a theory of human and social development; this is one reason for the religious objection to evolution. The moral quandary galvanized many American novelists who were especially fascinated and disturbed by the implications of human evolution. Henry James, Theodore Dreiser, Edith Wharton, Frank Norris, and Jack London wrote pessimistic stories of the consequences of human and social development. James and Wharton appropriated evolutionary ideas in order to reveal the way group dynamics force certain individuals to conform or perish, while Dreiser, Norris, and London examined directly the ethical limitations of human evolution. These narratives inevitably criticized the evolutionary worldview as too deterministic, reductive, and aggressive.

Keywords: evolution, human development, social development, naturalists, ethics

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.