Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 January 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Who are hip hop scholars writing for, and how can they write in ways that benefit both artists and their readership? The structure of academia limits the ethical production of knowledge to the elite few who have attained university funding or who have external funding. For instance, independent scholars/practitioners do not have access to the level of funding that tenure-track professors have. Audience access to academic work is likewise restricted to those who can get behind a paywall. In this chapter, I discuss how traditional academic funding models prevent ethical research, why collaborative approaches are preferable and require adequate funding, and how this affects hip hop studies specifically. Finally, I outline some potential interim solutions, with a clarion call for further work in this area.

Keywords: ethnography, hip hop, interview compensation, queer hip hop, research methodology

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.