Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 16 February 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article presents the major philosophical issues within criminal law and their relationships to each other. It is concerned with legal punishment as the domain of criminal law. It begins with three theories of punishment namely, retributive, consequentialist, and threat-based. It further addresses the reasons for punishment and divides the answer into two parts. The first part deals with those things that are material to a person's deservingness of punishment. The second part deals with identifying those harms or wrongs that justify punishment of those who cause, attempt, or risk them. The article requires carrying out general normative theory and it must be consistent with the account of the criminal law. The article discusses liberal versus perfectionist theories and leaves several avenues open. Finally, it discusses criminal liability for omissions.

Keywords: philosophical issues, criminal law, theories of punishment, normative theory, criminal liability

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.