Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 24 April 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This chapter examines the procedural roles of professional judges, lay judges, and lay jurors in criminal adjudication. It considers the relationships between each actor and other participants in the criminal process, using examples from specific jurisdictions within three identified adjudicatory frameworks. It also discusses competing trends in the roles of each actor in systems across the world, focusing on increased reliance on professional judges in some countries and introduction of new lay judge and jury systems in others. The likely impact of these shifts is explored by comparing patterns in judge versus jury decision-making. The chapter concludes by highlighting reasons for global trends observed in the allocation of decision-making in criminal adjudication to particular actors, noting the desire for greater accountability in systems shifting toward more judicial control as well as the attraction of democratizing decision-making in systems embracing trial by jury.

Keywords: professional judges, lay judges, jurors, criminal adjudication, criminal process, decision-making, trial by jury

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.