Oxford Handbooks - Scholarly Research Reviews

Subscriber Login

Forgotten your password?

Featured Article:


The CSI Effect


Oil Pastels drawing of Superior court Judge Harold M. Mulvey, court reporters and clerks, and jurors probably including foreman Robert L. Gaythier, as well as Frank J. Dilger and Jennie Jesilavich. 1971. CC BY-SA 2.0 via Flickr


The CSI effect posits that exposure to television programs that portray forensic science (e.g., CSI: Crime Scene Investigation) can change the way jurors evaluate forensic evidence. We review (1) the theory behind the CSI effect; (2) the perception of the effect among legal actors; (3) the academic treatment of the effect; and, (4) how courts have dealt with the effect. We demonstrate that while legal actors do see the CSI effect as a serious issue, there is virtually no empirical evidence suggesting it is a real phenomenon. Moreover, many of the remedies employed by courts may do no more than introduce bias into juror decision-making or even trigger the CSI effect when it would not normally occur. We end with suggestions for the proper treatment of the CSI effect in courts and directions for future scholarly work.

Read the full article >


Explore more articles

Learn more: Watch the video

Also available with Chinese subtitles on Youku

Helpful Resources

Connect with Oxford

We want to hear from you! Engage with OUP’s social media or contact the OHO team.


August 16, 2016

New OUPblog Post

"The life and work of H.G. Wells: a timeline" is now available on the OUPblog

August 3, 2016

August Update Live

206 individual articles and 11 Handbook titles from across 12 subject areas added to OHO

July 27, 2016

What Influences American Voter Turnout?

Watch a new video to find out more