By NASA, derivative work by Zafiroblue05 at en.wikipedia [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Exclusive moral concern for human beings is often thought to be the ideological source of many contemporary environmental problems. So the development of a non-anthropocentric theory of intrinsic moral value, according to which at least some parts of the non-human world are morally considerable for their own sake, is often thought to be a defining characteristic of a satisfying environmental ethic. This chapter unpacks three distinct forms of anthropocentrism, outlines three versions of ethical nonanthropocentrism, and sketches some of the debate between anthropocentrists and nonanthropocentrists before concluding that a virtue-theoretic approach to human natural goodness exemplifies one form of anthropocentrism that may continue to play a vital role in developing an environmental ethic suitable to the Anthropocene.
Explore more articles
- “A Day in the Life”: The Beatles and the BBC, May 1967 >
- Racial Rights >
- On the Origins of Stock Markets >
Learn more: Watch the video
Also available with Chinese subtitles on Youku